Diagnostic Accuracy of a Bespoke Multiorgan Ultrasound Approach in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Ultrasound International Open Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1971-7454
Casper Falster, Gro Egholm, Rune Wiig, Mikael Kjær Poulsen, Jacob Eifer Møller, Stefan Posth, Mikkel Brabrand, Christian Borbjerg Laursen
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of a Bespoke Multiorgan Ultrasound Approach in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.","authors":"Casper Falster,&nbsp;Gro Egholm,&nbsp;Rune Wiig,&nbsp;Mikael Kjær Poulsen,&nbsp;Jacob Eifer Møller,&nbsp;Stefan Posth,&nbsp;Mikkel Brabrand,&nbsp;Christian Borbjerg Laursen","doi":"10.1055/a-1971-7454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The aims of this study were to prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of a bespoke multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound approach for suspected pulmonary embolism and evaluate if this model allows reduced referral to further radiation diagnostics while maintaining safety standards. <b>Materials and Methods</b> Patients with suspected pulmonary embolism referred for CT pulmonary angiography or ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy were included as a convenience sample. All patients were subject to blinded ultrasound investigation with cardiac, lung, and deep venous ultrasound. The sensitivity and specificity of applied ultrasound signs and the hypothetical reduction in the need for further diagnostic workup were calculated. <b>Results</b> 75 patients were prospectively enrolled. The Wells score was below 2 in 48 patients, between 2 and 6 in 24 patients, and above 6 in 3 patients. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 28%. The most notable ultrasound signs were presence of a deep venous thrombus, at least two hypoechoic pleural-based lesions, the D-sign, the 60/60-sign, and a visible right ventricular thrombus which all had a specificity of 100%. Additionally, a multiorgan ultrasound investigation with no findings compatible with pulmonary embolism yielded a sensitivity of 95.2% (95%CI: 76.2-99.9). CT or scintigraphy could be safely avoided in 70% of cases (95%CI: 63.0-83.1%). <b>Conclusion</b> The findings of our study suggest that implementation of a multiorgan ultrasound assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism may safely reduce the need for CT or scintigraphy by confirming or dismissing the suspicion.</p>","PeriodicalId":44852,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound International Open","volume":"8 2","pages":"E59-E67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/5e/10-1055-a-1971-7454.PMC9886498.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1971-7454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The aims of this study were to prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of a bespoke multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound approach for suspected pulmonary embolism and evaluate if this model allows reduced referral to further radiation diagnostics while maintaining safety standards. Materials and Methods Patients with suspected pulmonary embolism referred for CT pulmonary angiography or ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy were included as a convenience sample. All patients were subject to blinded ultrasound investigation with cardiac, lung, and deep venous ultrasound. The sensitivity and specificity of applied ultrasound signs and the hypothetical reduction in the need for further diagnostic workup were calculated. Results 75 patients were prospectively enrolled. The Wells score was below 2 in 48 patients, between 2 and 6 in 24 patients, and above 6 in 3 patients. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 28%. The most notable ultrasound signs were presence of a deep venous thrombus, at least two hypoechoic pleural-based lesions, the D-sign, the 60/60-sign, and a visible right ventricular thrombus which all had a specificity of 100%. Additionally, a multiorgan ultrasound investigation with no findings compatible with pulmonary embolism yielded a sensitivity of 95.2% (95%CI: 76.2-99.9). CT or scintigraphy could be safely avoided in 70% of cases (95%CI: 63.0-83.1%). Conclusion The findings of our study suggest that implementation of a multiorgan ultrasound assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism may safely reduce the need for CT or scintigraphy by confirming or dismissing the suspicion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定制多器官超声入路诊断疑似肺栓塞的准确性。
本研究的目的是前瞻性地评估一种定制的多器官点护理超声方法对疑似肺栓塞的诊断准确性,并评估该模型是否可以在保持安全标准的同时减少进一步放射诊断的转诊。材料与方法将行CT肺血管造影或通气/灌注显像的疑似肺栓塞患者作为方便样本。所有患者均接受心、肺、深静脉超声盲法检查。计算应用超声征象的敏感性和特异性以及减少进一步诊断检查的假设需要。结果前瞻性纳入75例患者。48例患者的Wells评分低于2分,24例患者在2 - 6分之间,3例患者在6分以上。肺栓塞的患病率为28%。最显著的超声征象是深静脉血栓、至少两个胸膜低回声病变、d征、60/60征和可见的右心室血栓,这些征象的特异性均为100%。此外,多器官超声检查未发现与肺栓塞相符的结果,敏感性为95.2% (95%CI: 76.2-99.9)。70%的病例可以安全避免CT或显像检查(95%CI: 63.0 ~ 83.1%)。结论我们的研究结果表明,对疑似肺栓塞的患者实施多器官超声评估可以通过确认或排除怀疑来安全减少对CT或显像的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound International Open
Ultrasound International Open RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Congenital coarctation of the aorta: Role of peripheral vascular ultrasound in young hypertensive patients. Lung ultrasound score for the assessment of lung aeration in ARDS patients: comparison of two approaches. Pancreatic ultrasound: An update of measurements, reference values, and variations of the pancreas. Insights Into Modern Undergraduate Ultrasound Education: Prospective Comparison of Digital and Analog Teaching Resources in a Flipped Classroom Concept - The DIvAN Study. Ultrasound elastography: a brief clinical history of an evolving technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1