Mindfulness-based interventions for preadolescent children: A comprehensive meta-analysis

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101261
Tharen N. Kander , David Lawrence , Allison Fox , Stephen Houghton , Rodrigo Becerra
{"title":"Mindfulness-based interventions for preadolescent children: A comprehensive meta-analysis","authors":"Tharen N. Kander ,&nbsp;David Lawrence ,&nbsp;Allison Fox ,&nbsp;Stephen Houghton ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Becerra","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Among the many social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions available, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have become increasingly popular, particularly for preadolescent children who were once thought to not possess the metacognitive abilities or cognitive resources to benefit from such training. Although previous research syntheses indicate that MBIs show promise in promoting positive outcomes across a range of domains, the effectiveness of MBIs for preadolescent children may be masked by the effects of older children who have comprised the majority of samples in past meta-analyses. Hence, to better understand the impact of mindfulness-based training on preadolescent children (ages 6–12 years), the present study reviewed treatment effect estimates across a range of outcomes, including mindfulness, attention, metacognition and cognitive flexibility, emotional and behavioral regulation, academic achievement and school functioning, positive emotion and self-appraisal, negative emotion and subjective distress, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, social competence and prosocial behavior, and physical health. Thirty-two studies (<em>n</em><sub>participants</sub> = 3640) were identified and included in a random-effects meta-analyses. The results from multiple meta-analytical analyses conducted in the present study suggest that preadolescents have experienced significant benefits across attention, emotional and behavioral regulation, positive emotion and self-appraisal, and social competence and prosocial behavior (<em>g</em> = 0.19 to 0.39). However, the overall effect was deemed small (<em>g</em> = 0.34). Due to the lack of comparison studies with SEL interventions, it remains unclear whether MBIs are as effective as traditional approaches in promoting healthy development and academic achievement for preadolescent children. Additionally, results from the present meta-analysis suggest various recommendations for future studies to ensure a continued growth in understanding how MBIs can be used with children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 101261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440523000894/pdfft?md5=d5bc37d3ed1cd3bc0b60830e7a96d4d3&pid=1-s2.0-S0022440523000894-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440523000894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the many social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions available, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have become increasingly popular, particularly for preadolescent children who were once thought to not possess the metacognitive abilities or cognitive resources to benefit from such training. Although previous research syntheses indicate that MBIs show promise in promoting positive outcomes across a range of domains, the effectiveness of MBIs for preadolescent children may be masked by the effects of older children who have comprised the majority of samples in past meta-analyses. Hence, to better understand the impact of mindfulness-based training on preadolescent children (ages 6–12 years), the present study reviewed treatment effect estimates across a range of outcomes, including mindfulness, attention, metacognition and cognitive flexibility, emotional and behavioral regulation, academic achievement and school functioning, positive emotion and self-appraisal, negative emotion and subjective distress, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, social competence and prosocial behavior, and physical health. Thirty-two studies (nparticipants = 3640) were identified and included in a random-effects meta-analyses. The results from multiple meta-analytical analyses conducted in the present study suggest that preadolescents have experienced significant benefits across attention, emotional and behavioral regulation, positive emotion and self-appraisal, and social competence and prosocial behavior (g = 0.19 to 0.39). However, the overall effect was deemed small (g = 0.34). Due to the lack of comparison studies with SEL interventions, it remains unclear whether MBIs are as effective as traditional approaches in promoting healthy development and academic achievement for preadolescent children. Additionally, results from the present meta-analysis suggest various recommendations for future studies to ensure a continued growth in understanding how MBIs can be used with children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青春期前儿童的正念干预:一项综合荟萃分析
在许多可用的社会和情感学习(SEL)干预措施中,基于正念的干预措施(MBIs)越来越受欢迎,特别是对于青春期前的儿童,他们曾经被认为不具备元认知能力或认知资源,无法从这种训练中受益。尽管先前的综合研究表明mbi在促进一系列领域的积极结果方面表现出希望,但mbi对青春期前儿童的有效性可能被年龄较大的儿童的影响所掩盖,这些儿童在过去的荟萃分析中构成了大多数样本。因此,为了更好地了解正念训练对青春期前儿童(6-12岁)的影响,本研究回顾了一系列结果的治疗效果估计,包括正念、注意力、元认知和认知灵活性、情绪和行为调节、学业成就和学校功能、积极情绪和自我评价、消极情绪和主观困扰、外化问题、内化问题、社会能力和亲社会行为,以及身体健康。32项研究(nparticipants = 3640)被纳入随机效应荟萃分析。多项荟萃分析结果表明,学龄前儿童在注意力、情绪和行为调节、积极情绪和自我评价、社会能力和亲社会行为方面均有显著的改善(g = 0.19 ~ 0.39)。然而,总体效果被认为很小(g = 0.34)。由于缺乏与SEL干预的比较研究,目前尚不清楚MBIs在促进青春期前儿童的健康发展和学业成就方面是否与传统方法一样有效。此外,本荟萃分析的结果为未来的研究提供了各种建议,以确保对如何在儿童中使用mbi的理解持续增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the treatment utility of the Cognitive Assessment System: A meta-analysis of reading and mathematics outcomes The CARES classroom observation tool: Psychometrics of an observational measure of culturally responsive practices Profiles of principal stress and coping: Concurrent and prospective correlates Emotional intersection: Delineating test anxiety, emotional disorders, and student well-being Universal Teacher-Child Interaction Training in early childhood special education: Identifying mechanisms of action that explain why it works
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1