Ambulatory Intensive, Multidisciplinary Telehealth for High-Risk Discharges: Program Development, Implementation, and Early Impact.

Q3 Medicine Wisconsin Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-01
Brian C Hilgeman, Geoffrey Lamb
{"title":"Ambulatory Intensive, Multidisciplinary Telehealth for High-Risk Discharges: Program Development, Implementation, and Early Impact.","authors":"Brian C Hilgeman,&nbsp;Geoffrey Lamb","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Creating and implementing programs aimed at reducing readmissions for high-risk patients is critical to demonstrate quality and avoid financial penalties. Intensive, multidisciplinary interventions providing care to high-risk patients utilizing telehealth have not been explored in the literature. This study seeks to explain the quality improvement process, structure, intervention, lessons learned, and early outcomes of such a program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified prior to discharge with a multicomponent risk score. The enrolled population was managed intensively for 30 days after discharge through a suite of services, including weekly video visits with an advanced practice provider, pharmacist, and home nurse; regular lab monitoring; telemonitoring of vital signs; and intensive home health visits. The process was iterative, including a successful pilot phase followed by an expanded health system-wide intervention analyzing multiple outcomes including satisfaction with video visits, self-rated improvement in health, and readmissions compared to matched populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expanded program resulted in improvements in self-reported health (68.9% reported health was some or greatly improved) and high satisfaction with video visits (89% rated satisfaction with video visits 8-10). Thirty-day readmissions were reduced compared to individuals with similar readmission risk scores discharged from the same hospital (18.3% vs 31.1%) and individuals who declined to participate in the program (18.3% vs 26.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel model using telehealth to provide intensive, multidisciplinary care to high-risk patients has been successfully developed and deployed. Key areas for growth and exploration include developing an intervention that captures a greater percentage of discharged high-risk patients, including non-homebound patients, improving the electronic interface with home health care, and reducing costs while serving more patients. Data show that the intervention results in high patient satisfaction, improvements in self-reported health, and preliminary data showing reductions in readmission rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":38747,"journal":{"name":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Creating and implementing programs aimed at reducing readmissions for high-risk patients is critical to demonstrate quality and avoid financial penalties. Intensive, multidisciplinary interventions providing care to high-risk patients utilizing telehealth have not been explored in the literature. This study seeks to explain the quality improvement process, structure, intervention, lessons learned, and early outcomes of such a program.

Methods: Patients were identified prior to discharge with a multicomponent risk score. The enrolled population was managed intensively for 30 days after discharge through a suite of services, including weekly video visits with an advanced practice provider, pharmacist, and home nurse; regular lab monitoring; telemonitoring of vital signs; and intensive home health visits. The process was iterative, including a successful pilot phase followed by an expanded health system-wide intervention analyzing multiple outcomes including satisfaction with video visits, self-rated improvement in health, and readmissions compared to matched populations.

Results: The expanded program resulted in improvements in self-reported health (68.9% reported health was some or greatly improved) and high satisfaction with video visits (89% rated satisfaction with video visits 8-10). Thirty-day readmissions were reduced compared to individuals with similar readmission risk scores discharged from the same hospital (18.3% vs 31.1%) and individuals who declined to participate in the program (18.3% vs 26.4%).

Conclusions: This novel model using telehealth to provide intensive, multidisciplinary care to high-risk patients has been successfully developed and deployed. Key areas for growth and exploration include developing an intervention that captures a greater percentage of discharged high-risk patients, including non-homebound patients, improving the electronic interface with home health care, and reducing costs while serving more patients. Data show that the intervention results in high patient satisfaction, improvements in self-reported health, and preliminary data showing reductions in readmission rates.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高风险出院的门诊密集、多学科远程医疗:项目开发、实施和早期影响。
引言:创建和实施旨在减少高危患者再入院的项目对于展示质量和避免经济处罚至关重要。密集,多学科的干预措施提供护理高风险患者利用远程医疗尚未探讨在文献。本研究旨在解释质量改进过程、结构、干预、经验教训和早期结果。方法:在出院前用多成分风险评分对患者进行鉴定。入选人群出院后30天通过一系列服务进行集中管理,包括每周与高级执业医师、药剂师和家庭护士进行视频访问;实验室定期监测;生命体征远程监测;以及密集的家庭健康检查。该过程是反复进行的,包括一个成功的试点阶段,随后是一个扩大的卫生系统范围的干预,分析多种结果,包括对视频就诊的满意度、健康状况的自评改善以及与匹配人群相比的再入院率。结果:扩大后的项目改善了自我报告的健康状况(68.9%的人报告健康状况有一些改善或很大改善),对视频就诊的满意度也很高(89%的人认为视频就诊的满意度为8-10)。与从同一家医院出院的再入院风险评分相似的个体(18.3%对31.1%)和拒绝参加该计划的个体(18.3%对26.4%)相比,30天再入院率降低。结论:这种利用远程医疗为高风险患者提供密集、多学科护理的新型模式已经成功开发和部署。发展和探索的关键领域包括开发一种干预措施,以捕获更大比例的出院高风险患者,包括不在家的患者,改善家庭保健的电子界面,并在为更多患者服务的同时降低成本。数据显示,干预导致患者满意度高,自我报告健康状况改善,初步数据显示再入院率降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wisconsin Medical Journal
Wisconsin Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Wisconsin Medical Society is the largest association of medical doctors in the state with more than 12,000 members dedicated to the best interests of their patients. With that in mind, wisconsinmedicalsociety.org offers patients a unique source for reliable, physician-reviewed medical information. The Wisconsin Medical Society has been a trusted source for health policy leadership since 1841.
期刊最新文献
Age-Appropriate Cancer Screenings Through a Dermatology Len. Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Biology: Tools for Building New Treatments. Amiodarone Pharmacovigilance Through an Intelligent Electronic Health Record Application. Assessment of Uterine Fibroid Knowledge and Educational Interests Among Health Care Professionals. An Unusual Presentation of Blastomycosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1