Evaluation of a Nurse Practitioner Accreditation Program Pilot Study.

IF 2.1 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/15271544231152455
Eric Staples, Samuel H, Maria Miller Fellow
{"title":"Evaluation of a Nurse Practitioner Accreditation Program Pilot Study.","authors":"Eric Staples,&nbsp;Samuel H,&nbsp;Maria Miller Fellow","doi":"10.1177/15271544231152455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Canada, nurse practitioners (NPs) have been recognized as advanced practice nurses (APNs) for two decades. During this time, the number of NP education programs has increased and transitioned from post-baccalaureate to graduate and post-graduate level. In 2018, the Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing's (CASN) board of directors passed a motion to provide a voluntary NP accreditation program. Three NP programs (one collaborative) volunteered to participate in an accreditation pilot study between 2019 and 2020. As part of quality improvement, a pilot study evaluation involving all NP stakeholders was completed by a post-doctoral nursing fellow who led structured virtual focus groups. These groups focused on the NP accreditation standards and key elements, developed by CASN, as well as the accreditation process. The purpose of the evaluation study was to ensure the accreditation process was relevant, responsive to the needs of the discipline and promoted high-quality NP education. The data was analyzed and synthesized using content analysis. Several areas of improvement were identified to avoid duplication and to provide consistency in communication and collection of accreditation data. The recommendations led to revisions of the accreditation standards, to strengthen them and resulted in the standards and accreditation manual being published earlier than expected. The three NP programs involved in the pilot study received accreditation. The new standards will be utilized in Canada to improve the consistency and quality of NP education programs in Canada and abroad in the coming years.</p>","PeriodicalId":53177,"journal":{"name":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","volume":"24 2","pages":"110-117"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544231152455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Canada, nurse practitioners (NPs) have been recognized as advanced practice nurses (APNs) for two decades. During this time, the number of NP education programs has increased and transitioned from post-baccalaureate to graduate and post-graduate level. In 2018, the Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing's (CASN) board of directors passed a motion to provide a voluntary NP accreditation program. Three NP programs (one collaborative) volunteered to participate in an accreditation pilot study between 2019 and 2020. As part of quality improvement, a pilot study evaluation involving all NP stakeholders was completed by a post-doctoral nursing fellow who led structured virtual focus groups. These groups focused on the NP accreditation standards and key elements, developed by CASN, as well as the accreditation process. The purpose of the evaluation study was to ensure the accreditation process was relevant, responsive to the needs of the discipline and promoted high-quality NP education. The data was analyzed and synthesized using content analysis. Several areas of improvement were identified to avoid duplication and to provide consistency in communication and collection of accreditation data. The recommendations led to revisions of the accreditation standards, to strengthen them and resulted in the standards and accreditation manual being published earlier than expected. The three NP programs involved in the pilot study received accreditation. The new standards will be utilized in Canada to improve the consistency and quality of NP education programs in Canada and abroad in the coming years.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估护士执业资格认证计划试点研究。
在加拿大,执业护士(NPs)已被公认为高级执业护士(apn)二十年。在此期间,NP教育项目的数量有所增加,并从学士后阶段过渡到研究生和研究生阶段。2018年,加拿大护理学校协会(CASN)董事会通过了一项动议,提供自愿NP认证计划。三个NP项目(一个合作项目)自愿参加2019年至2020年的认证试点研究。作为质量改进的一部分,一项涉及所有NP利益相关者的试点研究评估由一名博士后护理研究员完成,他领导了结构化的虚拟焦点小组。这些小组的重点是由CASN制定的NP认证标准和关键要素,以及认证过程。评估研究的目的是确保认证过程是相关的,响应学科的需求,促进高质量的NP教育。采用内容分析法对数据进行分析和综合。确定了几个需要改进的领域,以避免重复,并在沟通和收集认证数据方面提供一致性。这些建议导致了对认可标准的修订,以加强这些标准,并导致标准和认可手册比预期更早出版。参与试点研究的三个NP项目获得了认证。新的标准将在加拿大使用,以提高加拿大和国外NP教育项目的一致性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice
Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that explores the multiple relationships between nursing and health policy. It serves as a major source of data-based study, policy analysis and discussion on timely, relevant policy issues for nurses in a broad variety of roles and settings, and for others outside of nursing who are interested in nursing-related policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Motivations, Challenges, and Integration of Internationally Educated Healthcare Workers in the UK: A Scoping Review. Analysis of Ohio Nurses' Voting Behaviors 2020-2023. The "Right Kinds of Nurses": Centering LPNs in the Nursing Labor Force. Racism and Redlining in the History of Psychiatric Policy and Practice in Atlanta: Implications for Nursing. Xylazine in the Unregulated Drug Market: An Integrative Review of Its Prevalence, Health Impacts, and Detection and Intervention Challenges in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1