Interventions to Improve Advanced Practitioner Work-Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction.

Heather Jackson, Olivia West, Annie Austin, Karline Peal
{"title":"Interventions to Improve Advanced Practitioner Work-Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction.","authors":"Heather Jackson,&nbsp;Olivia West,&nbsp;Annie Austin,&nbsp;Karline Peal","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Across the United States, an incremental need for cancer care continues to emerge. Specialty nurse practitioners and physician assistant teams have helped in meeting this demand. However, there is a need for evidence-based recommendations to inform appropriate provider-patient staffing ratios that encompass complex cancer treatments and ensure optimal care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review identified a gap in existing research with regard to recommended inpatient provider-patient ratios for hematology and oncology services. The conceptual framework of ICU nursing workload was utilized to ensure a comprehensive understanding of an inpatient specialty cancer provider's duties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the unit, job, patient, and situation workload levels, there were multiple interventions implemented to streamline systems and improve workplace conditions for providers, as measured by the work-related quality of life (WRQoL) scale. Patient satisfaction scores improved an average of 4% across multiple criteria and exceeded benchmark rankings by 10.7% surrounding communication with nurses and physicians (a 6.3% increase). Discharge efficiency improved, with 6.1% more discharges occurring by 11:00 am, and length of stay was noted to be 8.8 days fewer than teaching services treating the same cancer diagnosis. Finally, additional shift pay was greatly reduced and turnover decreased by 17%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Application of the conceptual framework of ICU nursing workload provided a scientific assessment of specialty inpatient cancer services within one institution. Interventions resulted in improved working conditions, patient satisfaction, discharge efficiency, and reduced turnover, ultimately ensuring the provision of high-quality cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","volume":"14 1","pages":"49-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0b/0a/jadpro-14-49.PMC9894207.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Across the United States, an incremental need for cancer care continues to emerge. Specialty nurse practitioners and physician assistant teams have helped in meeting this demand. However, there is a need for evidence-based recommendations to inform appropriate provider-patient staffing ratios that encompass complex cancer treatments and ensure optimal care.

Methods: A literature review identified a gap in existing research with regard to recommended inpatient provider-patient ratios for hematology and oncology services. The conceptual framework of ICU nursing workload was utilized to ensure a comprehensive understanding of an inpatient specialty cancer provider's duties.

Results: Within the unit, job, patient, and situation workload levels, there were multiple interventions implemented to streamline systems and improve workplace conditions for providers, as measured by the work-related quality of life (WRQoL) scale. Patient satisfaction scores improved an average of 4% across multiple criteria and exceeded benchmark rankings by 10.7% surrounding communication with nurses and physicians (a 6.3% increase). Discharge efficiency improved, with 6.1% more discharges occurring by 11:00 am, and length of stay was noted to be 8.8 days fewer than teaching services treating the same cancer diagnosis. Finally, additional shift pay was greatly reduced and turnover decreased by 17%.

Conclusion: Application of the conceptual framework of ICU nursing workload provided a scientific assessment of specialty inpatient cancer services within one institution. Interventions resulted in improved working conditions, patient satisfaction, discharge efficiency, and reduced turnover, ultimately ensuring the provision of high-quality cancer care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高高级执业医师工作相关生活质量和患者满意度的干预措施。
背景:在美国,对癌症治疗的需求不断增加。专业护士从业人员和医师助理团队帮助满足了这一需求。然而,有必要以证据为基础的建议,告知适当的提供者-患者人员配置比例,包括复杂的癌症治疗和确保最佳护理。方法:一篇文献综述确定了现有研究中关于血液学和肿瘤学服务的推荐住院医生-患者比例的差距。利用ICU护理工作量的概念框架来确保对住院专科癌症提供者的职责有全面的了解。结果:通过工作相关生活质量(WRQoL)量表测量,在单位、工作、患者和情况工作量水平内,实施了多种干预措施,以简化系统并改善提供者的工作场所条件。在多个标准中,患者满意度得分平均提高了4%,与护士和医生的沟通比基准排名高出10.7%(增加了6.3%)。出院效率提高了,到上午11点,出院率增加了6.1%,住院时间比治疗相同癌症诊断的教学服务少8.8天。最后,额外的轮班工资大大减少,营业额下降了17%。结论:应用ICU护理工作量概念框架,可对某医院肿瘤专科住院服务进行科学评估。干预措施改善了工作条件,提高了患者满意度,提高了出院效率,减少了人员流失率,最终确保了提供高质量的癌症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Multiple Myeloma: A Call to Action A Real-World Evidence Primer for Advanced Practice Providers: Integrating P-Reality X Into Shared Decision-Making for People With HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer Impact of an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Clinical Trial Enrollment in The US Oncology Network’s MYLUNG Consortium Beyond Standard Endocrine Therapy: A New Adjuvant Treatment in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer Evaluating the User-Perceived Benefit of a Virtual Lung Cancer Patient Education and Support Community: LVNG With Lung Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1