{"title":"Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women: A Literature Review","authors":"Katherine Zeven MD Class of 2025","doi":"10.1016/j.curtheres.2023.100697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) primarily affects women younger than age 50 years, is often misdiagnosed or undiagnosed, and research on this topic is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>A literature review was conducted to identify unique factors that can facilitate pregnancy-related SCAD (P-SCAD) diagnosis as well as differentiate it from nonpregnancy-related SCAD (NP-SCAD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar databases that focused on NP-SCAD and P-SCAD cases reported in North America between 2006 and 2021 using the terms <em>spontaneous coronary artery dissection, misdiagnosis</em>, and <em>women</em>, along with <em>postpartum</em> and <em>pregnancy</em>. The Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision quality assessment tool was applied to all reviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 108 journal articles reporting on individual cases, case series examining independent SCAD registries, as well as literature reviews were identified. These included 1547 SCAD cases in women, 510 of which were identified as P-SCAD. SCAD occurs predominantly in women, and thus presents a diagnostic challenge because women are not typically considered at risk for developing cardiovascular diseases and may present with symptoms that mimic other medical conditions. This issue is further exacerbated when SCAD develops during pregnancy or the postpartum period (ie, P-SCAD to differentiate it from SCAD occurring in other periods of woman's life such as NP-SCAD) because P-SCAD patients often present with less typical cardiac symptoms yet tend to experience more severe illness that can jeopardize their health and that of their baby. P-SCAD was associated with higher ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction rates, higher troponin levels, and a greater risk of cardiogenic shock compared with NP-SCAD cohorts. It was also evident that the failure rates associated with invasive procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery were higher in P-SCAD patients, whereas the mortality rates are comparable to NP-SCAD cohorts if diagnosed and treated appropriately.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Because younger women are rarely screened, they are at greater risk from SCAD, especially if this condition develops during pregnancy or ≤30 days following delivery. It is essential that medical professionals providing care for pregnant women understand P-SCAD risk factors and provide medical counseling for pregnant women or those planning a pregnancy to be better equipped to recognize its more subtle signs and symptoms, thus facilitating timely specialist referral, diagnosis, and treatment. (<em>Curr Ther Res Clin Exp</em>. 2023; 84:XXX–XXX)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10920,"journal":{"name":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 100697"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041465/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X23000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) primarily affects women younger than age 50 years, is often misdiagnosed or undiagnosed, and research on this topic is limited.
Objective
A literature review was conducted to identify unique factors that can facilitate pregnancy-related SCAD (P-SCAD) diagnosis as well as differentiate it from nonpregnancy-related SCAD (NP-SCAD).
Methods
A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar databases that focused on NP-SCAD and P-SCAD cases reported in North America between 2006 and 2021 using the terms spontaneous coronary artery dissection, misdiagnosis, and women, along with postpartum and pregnancy. The Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision quality assessment tool was applied to all reviews.
Results
A total of 108 journal articles reporting on individual cases, case series examining independent SCAD registries, as well as literature reviews were identified. These included 1547 SCAD cases in women, 510 of which were identified as P-SCAD. SCAD occurs predominantly in women, and thus presents a diagnostic challenge because women are not typically considered at risk for developing cardiovascular diseases and may present with symptoms that mimic other medical conditions. This issue is further exacerbated when SCAD develops during pregnancy or the postpartum period (ie, P-SCAD to differentiate it from SCAD occurring in other periods of woman's life such as NP-SCAD) because P-SCAD patients often present with less typical cardiac symptoms yet tend to experience more severe illness that can jeopardize their health and that of their baby. P-SCAD was associated with higher ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction rates, higher troponin levels, and a greater risk of cardiogenic shock compared with NP-SCAD cohorts. It was also evident that the failure rates associated with invasive procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery were higher in P-SCAD patients, whereas the mortality rates are comparable to NP-SCAD cohorts if diagnosed and treated appropriately.
Conclusions
Because younger women are rarely screened, they are at greater risk from SCAD, especially if this condition develops during pregnancy or ≤30 days following delivery. It is essential that medical professionals providing care for pregnant women understand P-SCAD risk factors and provide medical counseling for pregnant women or those planning a pregnancy to be better equipped to recognize its more subtle signs and symptoms, thus facilitating timely specialist referral, diagnosis, and treatment. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2023; 84:XXX–XXX)
背景自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)主要影响50岁以下的女性,经常被误诊或未被诊断,对这一主题的研究有限。目的通过文献综述,找出有助于妊娠相关SCAD(P-SCAD)诊断的独特因素,并将其与非妊娠相关性SCAD(NP-SCAD)区分开来,以及谷歌学者数据库,重点关注2006年至2021年间北美报告的NP-SCAD和P-SCAD病例,使用术语为自发性冠状动脉夹层、误诊、女性以及产后和妊娠。Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision质量评估工具适用于所有审查。结果共有108篇期刊文章报道了个别病例、检查独立SCAD登记处的病例系列以及文献综述。其中包括1547例女性SCAD病例,其中510例被确定为P-SCAD。SCAD主要发生在女性身上,因此对诊断提出了挑战,因为女性通常不被认为有患心血管疾病的风险,并且可能表现出类似其他疾病的症状。当SCAD在妊娠或产后发展时(即P-SCAD,将其与女性生命中其他时期(如NP-SCAD)发生的SCAD区分开来),这一问题会进一步加剧,因为P-SCAD患者通常表现出不太典型的心脏症状,但往往会经历更严重的疾病,这可能会危及他们和婴儿的健康。与NP-SCAD队列相比,P-SCAD与更高的ST段抬高心肌梗死率、更高的肌钙蛋白水平和更大的心源性休克风险相关。同样明显的是,P-SCAD患者与侵入性手术(如经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植手术)相关的失败率更高,而如果诊断和治疗得当,死亡率与NP-SCAD队列相当。结论由于年轻女性很少接受筛查,她们患SCAD的风险更大,尤其是在怀孕期间或产后≤30天出现这种情况。为孕妇提供护理的医疗专业人员必须了解P-SCAD风险因素,并为孕妇或计划怀孕的人提供医疗咨询,以便更好地识别其更微妙的体征和症状,从而促进及时的专家转诊、诊断和治疗。(Curr Ther Res Clin Exp.2023;84:XXX–XXX)
期刊介绍:
We also encourage the submission of manuscripts presenting preclinical and very preliminary research that may stimulate further investigation of potentially relevant findings, as well as in-depth review articles on specific therapies or disease states, and applied health delivery or pharmacoeconomics.
CTR encourages and supports the submission of manuscripts describing:
• Interventions designed to understand or improve human health, disease treatment or disease prevention;
• Studies that focus on problems that are uncommon in resource-rich countries;
• Research that is "under-published" because of limited access to monetary resources such as English language support and Open Access fees (CTR offers deeply discounted English language editing);
• Republication of articles previously published in non-English journals (eg, evidence-based guidelines) which could be useful if translated into English;
• Preclinical and clinical product development studies that are not pursued for further investigation based upon early phase results.