Evaluation of vertical accuracy of TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model in Egypt

IF 3.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.10.003
Abdelaty M.A. Zayed , Ahmed Saber , Mostafa A. Hamama , Mostafa Rabah , Ahmed Zaki
{"title":"Evaluation of vertical accuracy of TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model in Egypt","authors":"Abdelaty M.A. Zayed ,&nbsp;Ahmed Saber ,&nbsp;Mostafa A. Hamama ,&nbsp;Mostafa Rabah ,&nbsp;Ahmed Zaki","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study conducted aimed to examine the accuracy of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) in Egypt, specifically the TanDEM-X mission's 30 m and 12 m resolution DEMs and the SRTM DEM with a 30 m resolution. The accuracy of DEMs is essential for various civil engineering and surveying applications, especially in geoscience applications. To ensure the comparison's accuracy, the study used ellipsoidal heights instead of orthometric heights, preventing errors caused by global geopotential models in the conversion process. The evaluation of the three DEMs was carried out using 352 GNSS points. The findings indicate that both TanDEM-X DEMs with 30 m and 12 m resolutions outperform the SRTM 30 m in terms of vertical accuracy, making them ideal for geomatic applications that require higher-resolution DEMs. The TanDEM-X 30 m generates a standard deviation (STD) and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of approximately 3.03 m and 3.45 m, respectively. On the other hand, the TanDEM-X 12 m generates an STD and RMSE of approximately 2.86 m and 3.18 m, respectively. Comparatively, the SRTM 30 m produces an STD and RMSE of approximately 4.67 m and 5.35 m, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48539,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences","volume":"26 4","pages":"Pages 919-936"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982323000844/pdfft?md5=3d17d648d27002d01877eae67f6630c5&pid=1-s2.0-S1110982323000844-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982323000844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study conducted aimed to examine the accuracy of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) in Egypt, specifically the TanDEM-X mission's 30 m and 12 m resolution DEMs and the SRTM DEM with a 30 m resolution. The accuracy of DEMs is essential for various civil engineering and surveying applications, especially in geoscience applications. To ensure the comparison's accuracy, the study used ellipsoidal heights instead of orthometric heights, preventing errors caused by global geopotential models in the conversion process. The evaluation of the three DEMs was carried out using 352 GNSS points. The findings indicate that both TanDEM-X DEMs with 30 m and 12 m resolutions outperform the SRTM 30 m in terms of vertical accuracy, making them ideal for geomatic applications that require higher-resolution DEMs. The TanDEM-X 30 m generates a standard deviation (STD) and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of approximately 3.03 m and 3.45 m, respectively. On the other hand, the TanDEM-X 12 m generates an STD and RMSE of approximately 2.86 m and 3.18 m, respectively. Comparatively, the SRTM 30 m produces an STD and RMSE of approximately 4.67 m and 5.35 m, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TanDEM-X数字高程模型在埃及的垂直精度评价
该研究旨在检查埃及数字高程模型(DEM)的准确性,特别是TanDEM-X任务的30 m和12 m分辨率DEM以及分辨率为30 m的SRTM DEM。dem的准确性对于各种土木工程和测量应用至关重要,特别是在地球科学应用中。为了保证比较的准确性,本研究使用椭球体高度代替正交高度,避免了全球位势模式在转换过程中带来的误差。利用352个GNSS点对3个dem进行了评估。研究结果表明,具有30 m和12 m分辨率的TanDEM-X dem在垂直精度方面优于SRTM 30 m,使其成为需要更高分辨率dem的地理应用的理想选择。TanDEM-X 30 m的标准差和均方根误差分别约为3.03 m和3.45 m。另一方面,TanDEM-X 12 m产生的STD和RMSE分别约为2.86 m和3.18 m。相比之下,SRTM 30 m产生的STD和RMSE分别约为4.67 m和5.35 m。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences (EJRS) encompasses a comprehensive range of topics within Remote Sensing, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), planetary geology, and space technology development, including theories, applications, and modeling. EJRS aims to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed research focusing on the advancement of remote sensing and GIS technologies and their practical applications for effective planning, sustainable development, and environmental resource conservation. The journal particularly welcomes innovative papers with broad scientific appeal.
期刊最新文献
Surface deformation of the 26 January 2021 earthquake in the Sinjar – Hasakah Area, N Iraq and NE Syria, from Sentinel‑1A InSAR images New insights into the Menyuan Ms6.9 Earthquake, China: 3D slip inversion and fault modeling based on InSAR remote sensing approach Identifying water-lubricated faults in the vicinity of a dam Cot-DCN-YOLO: Self-attention-enhancing YOLOv8s for detecting garbage bins in urban street view images Fusing satellite imagery and ground geochemical data to map alteration zones for gold exploration in western Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1