Symmetric mechanism design: Comment

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Mathematical Economics Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102910
Bo Chen , Dmitriy Knyazev
{"title":"Symmetric mechanism design: Comment","authors":"Bo Chen ,&nbsp;Dmitriy Knyazev","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In an earlier paper published in this journal, Azrieli and Jain (2018) claim that a social choice function (SCF) is symmetrically implementable in a dominant strategy equilibrium only if the SCF is symmetric. This result crucially relies on their notion of dominant strategy, which is used in the game theory literature and is stronger than the one traditionally used in the mechanism design literature. We discuss the limitation of using their notion in mechanism design and provide a set of characterizations of symmetric mechanism design using the (weaker) standard notion that differ from their findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102910"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406823001039/pdfft?md5=99e7a0a373466ec5ec00db0a266b1ecc&pid=1-s2.0-S0304406823001039-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406823001039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an earlier paper published in this journal, Azrieli and Jain (2018) claim that a social choice function (SCF) is symmetrically implementable in a dominant strategy equilibrium only if the SCF is symmetric. This result crucially relies on their notion of dominant strategy, which is used in the game theory literature and is stronger than the one traditionally used in the mechanism design literature. We discuss the limitation of using their notion in mechanism design and provide a set of characterizations of symmetric mechanism design using the (weaker) standard notion that differ from their findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对称机制设计:注释
Azrieli和Jain(2018)在本期刊上发表的一篇较早的论文中声称,只有当社会选择函数(SCF)是对称的时,社会选择函数(SCF)才能在优势策略均衡中对称实现。这一结果很大程度上依赖于他们的优势策略概念,这一概念在博弈论文献中使用,比机制设计文献中传统使用的优势策略更强大。我们讨论了在机构设计中使用他们的概念的局限性,并提供了一组使用与他们的发现不同的(较弱的)标准概念的对称机构设计的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Economics
Journal of Mathematical Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary objective of the Journal is to provide a forum for work in economic theory which expresses economic ideas using formal mathematical reasoning. For work to add to this primary objective, it is not sufficient that the mathematical reasoning be new and correct. The work must have real economic content. The economic ideas must be interesting and important. These ideas may pertain to any field of economics or any school of economic thought.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Group obvious strategy-proofness: Definition and characterization The maxmin value of repeated games with incomplete information on one side and tail-measurable payoffs On strategy-proofness and single peakedness: A full characterization Interdependent Bargains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1