Assessment of Internet Available Patient Information on Chronic Pancreatitis Using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients Tool: A Systematic Search and Evaluation.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1159/000535073
Sebastian M Staubli, Shahi Ghani, Harriet Louise Walker, Giuseppe K Fusai, Dimitri A Raptis
{"title":"Assessment of Internet Available Patient Information on Chronic Pancreatitis Using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients Tool: A Systematic Search and Evaluation.","authors":"Sebastian M Staubli, Shahi Ghani, Harriet Louise Walker, Giuseppe K Fusai, Dimitri A Raptis","doi":"10.1159/000535073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a relevant chronic medical problem whereby delayed presentation and poor patient understanding can cause adverse effects. Quality of patient information available on the internet about CP is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the information about CP available online using the search term \"chronic pancreatitis\" in using the search engine Google has been conducted. The quality of the top 100 websites returned from this search term was analysed using the validated Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool (maximum score 36). Additional items were included in the website analysis specific to CP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 45 websites were eligible for analysis. The median EQIP score of the websites was 16 (interquartile range 12-19.5). The majority of websites originated from the USA and the United Kingdom with 31 and 11 websites, respectively. Provision of additional information was inconsistent, with most websites covering information regarding aetiology and advocating alcohol and tobacco cessation, but only few reporting on more complex issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Internet available information about CP is of limited quality. There is an immediate need for high quality, patient targeted, and informative literature accessible on the internet about this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"70-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a relevant chronic medical problem whereby delayed presentation and poor patient understanding can cause adverse effects. Quality of patient information available on the internet about CP is not known.

Methods: A systematic review of the information about CP available online using the search term "chronic pancreatitis" in using the search engine Google has been conducted. The quality of the top 100 websites returned from this search term was analysed using the validated Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool (maximum score 36). Additional items were included in the website analysis specific to CP.

Results: In total, 45 websites were eligible for analysis. The median EQIP score of the websites was 16 (interquartile range 12-19.5). The majority of websites originated from the USA and the United Kingdom with 31 and 11 websites, respectively. Provision of additional information was inconsistent, with most websites covering information regarding aetiology and advocating alcohol and tobacco cessation, but only few reporting on more complex issues.

Conclusion: Internet available information about CP is of limited quality. There is an immediate need for high quality, patient targeted, and informative literature accessible on the internet about this topic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用确保患者信息质量的工具评估慢性胰腺炎的互联网可用患者信息:系统的搜索和评估。
简介:慢性胰腺炎(CP)是一种相关的慢性医学问题,延迟的表现和患者的理解不足可能导致不良反应。互联网上关于CP的患者信息的质量尚不清楚。方法:对使用谷歌搜索词“慢性胰腺炎”的在线CP信息进行系统回顾。使用经过验证的确保患者质量信息(EQIP)工具(最高得分36分)分析从该搜索项返回的前100个网站的质量。在网站分析中加入了针对cp的附加项目。结果:总共有45个网站符合分析条件。网站的EQIP得分中位数为16分(IQR 12-19.5)。大部分网站来自美国和英国,分别有31个和11个网站。提供的额外信息不一致,大多数网站都涵盖了有关病因和倡导戒烟的信息,但只有少数网站报道了更复杂的问题。结论:网上可获得的CP信息质量有限。目前迫切需要在互联网上提供关于这一主题的高质量、以患者为目标和信息丰富的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
期刊最新文献
Markers of Prognosis for Acute Esophageal Necrosis: A Systematic Review. Prevalence and endoscopic features of colorectal non-polypoid lesions: a single-center retrospective study from a large cohort of FIT-positive screening patients in Northern Italy. Comparison of genetic mutations of gastric cancer diagnosed before or after H. pylori eradication and between differentiated and undifferentiated types using next-generation sequencing. Symptom Reporting in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Higher Burden of Symptoms detection using an interactive App. Association between the Achievement of Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery (TOLS) and Overall Survival in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Patients Following Major Hepatectomy: A Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1