Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Copenhagen Multi-Centre Psychosocial Infertility-Fertility Problem Stress Scales

IF 1.9 4区医学 Q2 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1111/ijn.13219

Yiming Gao MM, Qing Wang MM, Guopeng Li MD, Xiangyu Zhao MM, Rui Qin MD, Linghua Kong PhD, Ping Li PhD

{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Copenhagen Multi-Centre Psychosocial Infertility-Fertility Problem Stress Scales","authors":"Yiming Gao MM, Qing Wang MM, Guopeng Li MD, Xiangyu Zhao MM, Rui Qin MD, Linghua Kong PhD, Ping Li PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijn.13219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study is to introduce the Copenhagen Multi-Centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI)-Fertility Problem Stress Scales (COMPI-FPSS) into China and test its applicability in Chinese infertile population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Infertility-related stress not only influences patients' psychological well-being but is also strongly associated with reduced pregnancy rates and poorer assisted conception outcomes, thus warranting focussed attention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>The design used in this study is a cross-sectional survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 418 participants were recruited by convenience sampling from March to July 2022. The data were randomly divided into two parts: one for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis and the other for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability test. The critical ratio and homogeneity test were used to verify the differentiation and homogeneity of the COMPI-FPSS; the construct validity was determined by explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses; Cronbach's α coefficient and Spearman–Brown coefficient were used to assess the reliability; and criterion validity was expressed using correlation coefficients for the Perceived Stress Scale and the Negative Affect Scale as the validity criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The revised Chinese version of COMPI-FPSS has 11 items and 2 dimensions (i.e., personal stress domain and social stress domain). Exploratory factor analysis showed that the cumulative variance contribution rate of the two factors was 68.6%, and confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model fitted well. The score of the COMPI-FPSS was significantly and positively associated with perceived stress and negative affect. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.905, and the Spearman–Brown coefficient was 0.836, explaining excellent reliability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The revised Chinese version of COMPI-FPSS shows good reliability and validity, and it can be used to evaluate the infertility-related stress of infertile patients in China.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.13219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

The aim of this study is to introduce the Copenhagen Multi-Centre Psychosocial Infertility (COMPI)-Fertility Problem Stress Scales (COMPI-FPSS) into China and test its applicability in Chinese infertile population.

Background

Infertility-related stress not only influences patients' psychological well-being but is also strongly associated with reduced pregnancy rates and poorer assisted conception outcomes, thus warranting focussed attention.

Design

The design used in this study is a cross-sectional survey.

Methods

A total of 418 participants were recruited by convenience sampling from March to July 2022. The data were randomly divided into two parts: one for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis and the other for confirmatory factor analysis and reliability test. The critical ratio and homogeneity test were used to verify the differentiation and homogeneity of the COMPI-FPSS; the construct validity was determined by explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses; Cronbach's α coefficient and Spearman–Brown coefficient were used to assess the reliability; and criterion validity was expressed using correlation coefficients for the Perceived Stress Scale and the Negative Affect Scale as the validity criteria.

Results

The revised Chinese version of COMPI-FPSS has 11 items and 2 dimensions (i.e., personal stress domain and social stress domain). Exploratory factor analysis showed that the cumulative variance contribution rate of the two factors was 68.6%, and confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model fitted well. The score of the COMPI-FPSS was significantly and positively associated with perceived stress and negative affect. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.905, and the Spearman–Brown coefficient was 0.836, explaining excellent reliability.

Conclusion

The revised Chinese version of COMPI-FPSS shows good reliability and validity, and it can be used to evaluate the infertility-related stress of infertile patients in China.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

中文版哥本哈根多中心心理社会不孕症-生育问题压力量表的信度和效度。

目的:将哥本哈根多中心社会心理不孕症(COMPI)-生育问题压力量表(COMPI- fpss)引入中国，并检验其在中国不育人群中的适用性。背景:不孕症相关压力不仅影响患者的心理健康，而且与妊娠率降低和辅助受孕结果较差密切相关，因此值得关注。设计:本研究采用的设计是横断面调查。方法:采用方便抽样法，于2022年3月至7月共招募418名研究对象。数据随机分为两部分，一部分进行项目分析和探索性因子分析，另一部分进行验证性因子分析和信度检验。采用临界比率和均匀性检验验证COMPI-FPSS的分化和均匀性;构念效度采用解释性因子分析和验证性因子分析;信度评估采用Cronbach′s α系数和Spearman-Brown系数;以感知压力量表和负面情绪量表的相关系数作为效度标准来表达效度。结果:修订后的中文版COMPI-FPSS量表包含11个条目和2个维度(即个人压力域和社会压力域)。探索性因子分析表明，两因素的累积方差贡献率为68.6%，验证性因子分析表明模型拟合良好。COMPI-FPSS得分与感知压力和消极情绪呈显著正相关。总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.905,Spearman-Brown系数为0.836，信度极佳。结论:修订后的中文版COMPI-FPSS具有良好的信度和效度，可用于评估中国不孕患者的不孕相关压力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Nursing Practice NURSING-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.