Effectiveness of Nebulized Tranexamic Acid in Patients with Moderate-to-Massive Hemoptysis at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1089/jamp.2022.0038
Afrah Alkazemi, Mary Kovacevic, Kevin Dube, Julie C Lauffenburger, Adam Smith, Stephen Malinowski, Gerald L Weinhouse
{"title":"Effectiveness of Nebulized Tranexamic Acid in Patients with Moderate-to-Massive Hemoptysis at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Afrah Alkazemi, Mary Kovacevic, Kevin Dube, Julie C Lauffenburger, Adam Smith, Stephen Malinowski, Gerald L Weinhouse","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2022.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The management of severe hemoptysis mainly consists of invasive interventional procedures, including angiographic bronchial artery embolization, various endobronchial interventions, and sometimes surgery. However, there are limited effective noninvasive medical therapies available. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nebulized tranexamic acid (TXA) administration compared with conventional management in patients with hemoptysis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This Institutional Review Board-approved, single-center, retrospective matched cohort study was performed from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2021. Electronic health record data were used to identify all adult inpatients with hemoptysis (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code R04.2). All patients who received ≥1 dose of nebulized TXA were matched with up to five controls based on available severity criteria (hemoptysis severity, need for mechanical ventilation, and sequential organ failure assessment score at the time of hemoptysis diagnosis) with coarsened exact matching. The primary outcome was the need for invasive interventions for the management of hemoptysis. Secondary outcomes included time to hemoptysis resolution, duration of mechanical ventilation, hemoptysis recurrence, and hospital length of stay. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 14 patients were treated with nebulized TXA; they were matched with 58 controls. Patients were 59.7% male, had a median age of 65.5 years, with airway disease (36.1%) being the major etiology of hemoptysis. There was no difference in the number of patients who required an invasive intervention between the TXA (35.7%) versus control group (56.9%), <i>p</i> = 0.344. Additionally, no difference was found in the time to hemoptysis resolution (<i>p</i> = 0.050), duration on mechanical ventilation (<i>p</i> = 0.128), hemoptysis recurrence (<i>p</i> = 1.000), or hospital length of stay (<i>p</i> = 0.139). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients with hemoptysis, nebulized TXA may be considered as a noninvasive option for the management of hemoptysis. However, a larger analysis is warranted to determine the impact of nebulized TXA on invasive interventions for management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":"309-315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2022.0038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The management of severe hemoptysis mainly consists of invasive interventional procedures, including angiographic bronchial artery embolization, various endobronchial interventions, and sometimes surgery. However, there are limited effective noninvasive medical therapies available. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nebulized tranexamic acid (TXA) administration compared with conventional management in patients with hemoptysis. Methods: This Institutional Review Board-approved, single-center, retrospective matched cohort study was performed from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2021. Electronic health record data were used to identify all adult inpatients with hemoptysis (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code R04.2). All patients who received ≥1 dose of nebulized TXA were matched with up to five controls based on available severity criteria (hemoptysis severity, need for mechanical ventilation, and sequential organ failure assessment score at the time of hemoptysis diagnosis) with coarsened exact matching. The primary outcome was the need for invasive interventions for the management of hemoptysis. Secondary outcomes included time to hemoptysis resolution, duration of mechanical ventilation, hemoptysis recurrence, and hospital length of stay. Results: A total of 14 patients were treated with nebulized TXA; they were matched with 58 controls. Patients were 59.7% male, had a median age of 65.5 years, with airway disease (36.1%) being the major etiology of hemoptysis. There was no difference in the number of patients who required an invasive intervention between the TXA (35.7%) versus control group (56.9%), p = 0.344. Additionally, no difference was found in the time to hemoptysis resolution (p = 0.050), duration on mechanical ventilation (p = 0.128), hemoptysis recurrence (p = 1.000), or hospital length of stay (p = 0.139). Conclusions: In patients with hemoptysis, nebulized TXA may be considered as a noninvasive option for the management of hemoptysis. However, a larger analysis is warranted to determine the impact of nebulized TXA on invasive interventions for management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氨甲环酸雾化治疗中重度咯血的疗效观察。
导言:严重咯血的治疗主要包括有创性介入治疗,包括支气管动脉血管造影栓塞、各种支气管内介入治疗,有时也包括手术治疗。然而,有效的非侵入性医学治疗方法有限。本分析的目的是评价雾化氨甲环酸(TXA)治疗咯血患者的有效性和安全性,并与传统治疗方法进行比较。方法:这项经机构审查委员会批准的单中心回顾性匹配队列研究于2018年1月1日至2021年3月31日进行。电子健康记录数据用于识别所有成年咯血住院患者(《国际疾病分类》第十版,代码R04.2)。根据可用的严重程度标准(咯血严重程度、机械通气需求和咯血诊断时序贯器官衰竭评估评分),所有接受≥1剂量雾化TXA的患者与多达5名对照进行粗化精确匹配。主要结果是需要有创性干预治疗咯血。次要结局包括咯血消退时间、机械通气持续时间、咯血复发和住院时间。结果:14例患者接受TXA雾化治疗;他们与58名对照组相匹配。患者中男性占59.7%,中位年龄65.5岁,呼吸道疾病(36.1%)是咯血的主要病因。在TXA组(35.7%)与对照组(56.9%)之间,需要侵入性干预的患者数量没有差异,p = 0.344。此外,咯血消退时间(p = 0.050)、机械通气持续时间(p = 0.128)、咯血复发(p = 1.000)或住院时间(p = 0.139)均无差异。结论:在咯血患者中,雾化TXA可以被认为是一种无创的治疗咯血的方法。然而,需要更大的分析来确定雾化TXA对有创干预治疗的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
期刊最新文献
In Vitro Comparison of Inspiration-Synchronized and Continuous Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer During Adult Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Prospects of Inhalable Formulations of Conventionally Administered Repurposed Drugs for Adjunctive Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Supporting Evidence from Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies. Scale-Up and Postapproval Changes in Orally Inhaled Drug Products: Scientific and Regulatory Considerations. Assessing Human Lung Pharmacokinetics Using Exhaled Breath Particles. Demographic and Asthma-Related Characteristics of Asthmatics Using Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers and Dry Powder Inhalers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1