The Emerging Role of Reinforcement in the Clinician's Path from Continuing Education to Practice.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000541
Katie Stringer Lucero, Betsy Williams, Donald E Moore
{"title":"The Emerging Role of Reinforcement in the Clinician's Path from Continuing Education to Practice.","authors":"Katie Stringer Lucero, Betsy Williams, Donald E Moore","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Continuing education (CE) activities may affect clinicians' knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, and/or performance. Studies have suggested that self-efficacy may moderate or mediate the relationship between knowledge/competence and performance. Some results have shown that increases in knowledge/competence contributed to increases in self-efficacy. However, clinicians do not always learn something \"new\" when they participate in CE activities; rather, their knowledge or skills may be reinforced. This study examined whether self-efficacy was greater when clinicians reinforced what they already knew compared with when they learned something new.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hierarchical linear modeling was conducted to examine the moderating role of status of knowledge/competence post-CE (reinforced/improved) in the relationship between post-CE knowledge/competence score and self-efficacy across 153 online continuing medical education- and/or CE-certified activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hierarchical linear modeling showed that learners with higher post-CE scores have higher post-self-efficacy ratings. Reinforced learners had higher post-CE-self-efficacy ratings than improved learners, controlling for post-CE score.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study contributes to an expanded understanding of the path from CE to practice. There was benefit to self-efficacy for learners who reinforced but did not improve their knowledge/competence. This study also suggests that pre-post questions can be considered part of the learning process.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Continuing education (CE) activities may affect clinicians' knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, and/or performance. Studies have suggested that self-efficacy may moderate or mediate the relationship between knowledge/competence and performance. Some results have shown that increases in knowledge/competence contributed to increases in self-efficacy. However, clinicians do not always learn something "new" when they participate in CE activities; rather, their knowledge or skills may be reinforced. This study examined whether self-efficacy was greater when clinicians reinforced what they already knew compared with when they learned something new.

Methods: Hierarchical linear modeling was conducted to examine the moderating role of status of knowledge/competence post-CE (reinforced/improved) in the relationship between post-CE knowledge/competence score and self-efficacy across 153 online continuing medical education- and/or CE-certified activities.

Results: The hierarchical linear modeling showed that learners with higher post-CE scores have higher post-self-efficacy ratings. Reinforced learners had higher post-CE-self-efficacy ratings than improved learners, controlling for post-CE score.

Discussion: This study contributes to an expanded understanding of the path from CE to practice. There was benefit to self-efficacy for learners who reinforced but did not improve their knowledge/competence. This study also suggests that pre-post questions can be considered part of the learning process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强化在临床医生从继续教育到实践的道路上的新作用。
继续教育(CE)活动可能会影响临床医生的知识、技能、自我效能感和/或表现。研究表明,自我效能感可以调节或调解知识/能力与绩效之间的关系。一些结果表明,知识/能力的提高有助于自我效能的提高。然而,临床医生在参与CE活动时并不总是能学到一些“新”的东西;相反,他们的知识或技能可能会得到加强。这项研究考察了当临床医生强化他们已经知道的东西时,自我效能感是否比学习新东西时更强。方法:采用层次线性模型,通过153项在线继续医学教育和/或ce认证活动,考察ce后知识/能力状态(强化/改善)在ce后知识/能力得分与自我效能之间的调节作用。结果:层次线性模型显示,ce后得分越高的学习者的后自我效能评分越高。在控制ce后得分的情况下,强化型学习者的ce后自我效能评分高于改善型学习者。讨论:本研究有助于扩大对从CE到实践之路的理解。自我效能感对强化但没有提高知识/能力的学习者有好处。这项研究还表明,前后问题可以被认为是学习过程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgment. Applying the Purpose, Autonomy, Confidence, Engrossment Model of Motivational Design to Support Motivation for Continuing Professional Development. The Professional Agency in Supervision of General Practitioners Before Their Supervisor Training Module: A Narrative Positioning Analysis. Assessing Physician Motivation to Engage in Continuing Professional Development on Artificial Intelligence. Challenges of Contemporary Practice: Internists Maintaining Competency in Multiple Specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1