Evaluation of healthcare facilities and personnel distribution in Lagos State: implications on universal health coverage.

Maxwell Obubu, Nkata Chuku, Alozie Ananaba, Firdausi Umar Sadiq, Emmanuel Sambo, Oluwatosin Kolade, Tolulope Oyekanmi, Kehinde Olaosebikan, Oluwafemi Serrano
{"title":"Evaluation of healthcare facilities and personnel distribution in Lagos State: implications on universal health coverage.","authors":"Maxwell Obubu,&nbsp;Nkata Chuku,&nbsp;Alozie Ananaba,&nbsp;Firdausi Umar Sadiq,&nbsp;Emmanuel Sambo,&nbsp;Oluwatosin Kolade,&nbsp;Tolulope Oyekanmi,&nbsp;Kehinde Olaosebikan,&nbsp;Oluwafemi Serrano","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2023.2170651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nigeria is considering making Universal Health Coverage (UHC) a common policy goal to ensure that citizens have access to high-quality healthcare services without crippling debt. Globally, there is an acute shortage of human resources for Health (HRH), and the most significant burden is borne by low-income countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. This shortage has considerably constrained the achievement of health-related development goals and impeded accelerated progress toward universal health coverage. We examine the existing human resource capacity and the distribution of health facilities in Lagos state in this study, discussing the implications of our findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study is descriptive using secondary data analysis. We leverage census-based primary data collected by NOIPoll on health facility assessments in Lagos state. The collected data was analyzed using counts, ratios, rates, and percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observe a ratio of 5,014 people to 1 general medical doctor, 2,942 people to 1 specialist, 2,165 people to 1 nurse, and 5,117 people to 1 midwife, which are far higher than the WHO recommendation. We also observe that the ratio of nurses to general medical practitioners is 2.2:1 in urban areas and 2.7:1 in rural. In contrast, the ratio of nurses to specialist medical doctors is 1.3:1 in the urban area and 1.5:1 in the rural areas of Lagos state. The overall nurse per general medical practitioner ratio is 2.3:1 and 1.4:1 for specialist medical doctors. 77.2% of the health facilities surveyed were in the urban areas, with private-for-profit facilities accounting for 82.9%, government facilities accounting for 15.4%, and NGOs/faith clinics accounting for 1.7%. Primary healthcare facilities account for 75.3% of the facilities surveyed, secondary and tertiary facilities account for 24.6% and 0.08%, respectively. Alimosho LGA has the most health facilities (77.38% PHCs, and 22.62% SHCs) and staff strength specifically for general medical practitioners, specialists, nurses, and midwives (16.9%, 19.9%, 16.7%, 17.1%, respectively). Eti-Osa LGA has the best density ratio for generalist doctors, specialist doctors, and nurses per 10,000 (4.42, 12.96, and 11.34 respectively), while Ikeja has the best midwife population density ratio 5.46 per 10,000 population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The distribution of health personnel and facilities in Lagos State is not equitable, with evident variation between rural and urban areas. This inequitable distribution could affect the physical distance of health facilities to residents, leading to decreased utilization, ultimately poor health outcomes, and impaired access. Much like child mortality, maternal mortality also exhibits a correlation with healthcare worker density. As the physician density increases linearly, the maternal mortality rate decreases exponentially. However, due to the low number of healthcare workers in Lagos state, doctors, nurses, and midwives are frequently unavailable during childbirth, resulting in increasing infant, neonatal, and maternal death. As such, the government should adopt the UHC strategy in its distribution of facilities and personnel in the state for adequate coverage and optimal performance of the facilities. Also, additional investments are needed in some parts of the state to improve access to tertiary health facilities and leverage private sector capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2023.2170651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Nigeria is considering making Universal Health Coverage (UHC) a common policy goal to ensure that citizens have access to high-quality healthcare services without crippling debt. Globally, there is an acute shortage of human resources for Health (HRH), and the most significant burden is borne by low-income countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. This shortage has considerably constrained the achievement of health-related development goals and impeded accelerated progress toward universal health coverage. We examine the existing human resource capacity and the distribution of health facilities in Lagos state in this study, discussing the implications of our findings.

Methods: The study is descriptive using secondary data analysis. We leverage census-based primary data collected by NOIPoll on health facility assessments in Lagos state. The collected data was analyzed using counts, ratios, rates, and percentages.

Results: We observe a ratio of 5,014 people to 1 general medical doctor, 2,942 people to 1 specialist, 2,165 people to 1 nurse, and 5,117 people to 1 midwife, which are far higher than the WHO recommendation. We also observe that the ratio of nurses to general medical practitioners is 2.2:1 in urban areas and 2.7:1 in rural. In contrast, the ratio of nurses to specialist medical doctors is 1.3:1 in the urban area and 1.5:1 in the rural areas of Lagos state. The overall nurse per general medical practitioner ratio is 2.3:1 and 1.4:1 for specialist medical doctors. 77.2% of the health facilities surveyed were in the urban areas, with private-for-profit facilities accounting for 82.9%, government facilities accounting for 15.4%, and NGOs/faith clinics accounting for 1.7%. Primary healthcare facilities account for 75.3% of the facilities surveyed, secondary and tertiary facilities account for 24.6% and 0.08%, respectively. Alimosho LGA has the most health facilities (77.38% PHCs, and 22.62% SHCs) and staff strength specifically for general medical practitioners, specialists, nurses, and midwives (16.9%, 19.9%, 16.7%, 17.1%, respectively). Eti-Osa LGA has the best density ratio for generalist doctors, specialist doctors, and nurses per 10,000 (4.42, 12.96, and 11.34 respectively), while Ikeja has the best midwife population density ratio 5.46 per 10,000 population.

Conclusion: The distribution of health personnel and facilities in Lagos State is not equitable, with evident variation between rural and urban areas. This inequitable distribution could affect the physical distance of health facilities to residents, leading to decreased utilization, ultimately poor health outcomes, and impaired access. Much like child mortality, maternal mortality also exhibits a correlation with healthcare worker density. As the physician density increases linearly, the maternal mortality rate decreases exponentially. However, due to the low number of healthcare workers in Lagos state, doctors, nurses, and midwives are frequently unavailable during childbirth, resulting in increasing infant, neonatal, and maternal death. As such, the government should adopt the UHC strategy in its distribution of facilities and personnel in the state for adequate coverage and optimal performance of the facilities. Also, additional investments are needed in some parts of the state to improve access to tertiary health facilities and leverage private sector capacity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价拉各斯州的卫生保健设施和人员分布:对全民健康覆盖的影响。
背景:尼日利亚正在考虑将全民健康覆盖(UHC)作为一项共同政策目标,以确保公民能够获得高质量的医疗保健服务,而不会造成严重债务。在全球范围内,卫生人力资源严重短缺,最严重的负担由低收入国家承担,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲。这种短缺在很大程度上限制了与卫生有关的发展目标的实现,阻碍了在实现全民健康覆盖方面的加速进展。在本研究中,我们考察了拉各斯州现有的人力资源能力和卫生设施的分布,讨论了我们研究结果的含义。方法:采用二次资料分析方法进行描述性研究。我们利用NOIPoll收集的关于拉各斯州卫生设施评估的基于人口普查的原始数据。收集的数据使用计数、比率、比率和百分比进行分析。结果:全科医生和专科医生的比例分别为5014比1,专科医生和专科医生的比例分别为2942比1,护士和助产士的比例分别为2165比1,助产士和助产士的比例分别为5117比1,远远高于世界卫生组织推荐的比例。我们还观察到,护士与全科医生的比例在城市地区为2.2:1,在农村地区为2.7:1。相比之下,拉各斯州城市地区护士与专科医生的比例为1.3:1,农村地区为1.5:1。护士与全科医生的比率为2.3:1,专科医生为1.4:1。77.2%的受访卫生机构位于城市地区,其中私营营利性机构占82.9%,政府机构占15.4%,非政府组织/信仰诊所占1.7%。初级卫生保健设施占调查设施的75.3%,二级和三级卫生保健设施分别占24.6%和0.08%。Alimosho地方政府拥有最多的卫生设施(77.38%的初级保健中心和22.62%的初级保健中心)和专门为全科医生、专家、护士和助产士服务的工作人员(分别为16.9%、19.9%、16.7%和17.1%)。etii - osa LGA的全科医生、专科医生和护士的人口密度比最佳(分别为每万人4.42、12.96和11.34),而Ikeja的助产士人口密度比最佳(每万人5.46)。结论:拉各斯州卫生人员和设施分布不公平,城乡差异明显。这种不公平的分配可能会影响卫生设施与居民之间的实际距离,导致利用率下降,最终导致健康结果不佳,并妨碍获得服务。与儿童死亡率非常相似,孕产妇死亡率也与卫生保健工作者密度相关。随着医生密度线性增加,产妇死亡率呈指数级下降。然而,由于拉各斯州的卫生保健工作者人数少,在分娩期间经常没有医生、护士和助产士,导致婴儿、新生儿和孕产妇死亡人数增加。因此,政府应在该州的设施和人员分布中采用全民健康覆盖战略,以充分覆盖和优化设施的性能。此外,该州一些地区需要增加投资,以改善获得三级保健设施的机会,并利用私营部门的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
An insight into the updated pharmacotherapy of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in lean individuals: a review. Chest tube size selection for pleural effusion: from the perspective of thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists. Prescription for crisis: the compounding effect of community drug shortages on Lebanon's healthcare system. Outcomes and complications of heart failure with iron deficiency anemia: a nationwide analysis. Benign acute myositis in an adult: case-based review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1