Opioid Consumption After Upper Extremity Surgery: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS HAND Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-23 DOI:10.1177/15589447231160211
Minh N Q Huynh, Morgan Yuan, Lucas Gallo, Oluwatobi R Olaiya, Jouseph Barkho, Matthew McRae
{"title":"Opioid Consumption After Upper Extremity Surgery: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Minh N Q Huynh, Morgan Yuan, Lucas Gallo, Oluwatobi R Olaiya, Jouseph Barkho, Matthew McRae","doi":"10.1177/15589447231160211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is currently an overprescription of opioids, which may result in abuse and diversion of narcotics. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate opioid prescription practices and consumption by patients after upper extremity surgery. This review was registered a priori on Open Science Framework (osf.io/6u5ny) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search strategy was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases (from their inception to October 17, 2021). Prospective studies investigating opioid consumption of patients aged 18 years or older undergoing upper extremity surgeries were included. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias 2.0 tools were used for quality assessment. In total, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria, including 7 randomized controlled trials and 14 prospective cohort studies. This represented 4195 patients who underwent upper extremity surgery. Most patients took less than half of the prescribed opioids. The percentage of opioids consumed ranged from 11% to 77%. There was moderate to severe risk of bias among the included studies. This review demonstrated that there is routinely excessive opioid prescription relative to consumption after upper limb surgery. Additional randomized trials are warranted, particularly with standardized reporting of opioid consumption and assessment of patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447231160211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is currently an overprescription of opioids, which may result in abuse and diversion of narcotics. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate opioid prescription practices and consumption by patients after upper extremity surgery. This review was registered a priori on Open Science Framework (osf.io/6u5ny) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search strategy was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases (from their inception to October 17, 2021). Prospective studies investigating opioid consumption of patients aged 18 years or older undergoing upper extremity surgeries were included. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias 2.0 tools were used for quality assessment. In total, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria, including 7 randomized controlled trials and 14 prospective cohort studies. This represented 4195 patients who underwent upper extremity surgery. Most patients took less than half of the prescribed opioids. The percentage of opioids consumed ranged from 11% to 77%. There was moderate to severe risk of bias among the included studies. This review demonstrated that there is routinely excessive opioid prescription relative to consumption after upper limb surgery. Additional randomized trials are warranted, particularly with standardized reporting of opioid consumption and assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上肢手术后阿片类药物的使用:系统回顾
目前阿片类药物处方过量,可能会导致麻醉剂的滥用和转移。本系统性综述旨在调查上肢手术后患者的阿片类药物处方使用情况。本综述事先已在开放科学框架(osf.io/6u5ny)上注册,并遵循了系统综述和元分析首选报告项目指南。我们使用 MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 数据库(从开始到 2021 年 10 月 17 日)执行了检索策略。研究纳入了对接受上肢手术的 18 岁或以上患者阿片类药物消耗情况进行调查的前瞻性研究。采用 "干预措施非随机研究中的偏倚风险 "和 "偏倚风险 2.0 "工具进行质量评估。共有 21 篇文章符合纳入标准,其中包括 7 项随机对照试验和 14 项前瞻性队列研究。这代表了 4195 名接受上肢手术的患者。大多数患者服用的阿片类药物不到处方的一半。阿片类药物的用量比例从11%到77%不等。纳入的研究存在中度到严重的偏倚风险。本综述表明,上肢手术后阿片类药物的处方量与用量相比通常过高。有必要进行更多的随机试验,尤其是对阿片类药物消耗量进行标准化报告并对患者报告的结果进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
期刊最新文献
Early and Late Intrinsic Hand Muscle Reinnervation After End-to-Side AIN to Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfer. Generic Volar Locking Plate Use in Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes and Cost Reduction. Infections and Patient Satisfaction in WALANT Hand Surgery in a Hospital Procedure Room. Management Options and Clinical Outcomes After Flexor Tendon Ruptures Following Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures. Decreased Complication Rate Using Partially Threaded Compared With Fully Threaded Compression Screws in 4 Corner Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1