A Pilot Study to Examine the Effect of Passive Straight Leg Raise Performed During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Cerebral Perfusion Measured by Noninvasive Cerebral Oximetry.

Scott Lorensini, Shivesh Prakash, David McNeill, Neil Spencer, Shailesh Bihari
{"title":"A Pilot Study to Examine the Effect of Passive Straight Leg Raise Performed During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Cerebral Perfusion Measured by Noninvasive Cerebral Oximetry.","authors":"Scott Lorensini,&nbsp;Shivesh Prakash,&nbsp;David McNeill,&nbsp;Neil Spencer,&nbsp;Shailesh Bihari","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Passive leg raise (PLR) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is simple and noninvasive maneuver, which can potentially improve patient-related outcomes. Initial CPR guidelines have previously advocated \"elevation of the lower extremities to augment artificial circulation during CPR.\" There is lack of supporting evidence for this recommendation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a double cross-over physiologic efficacy randomized study.</p><p><strong>Setting and patients: </strong>Study in 10 subjects with in-hospital cardiac arrest for whom CPR was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Subjects were randomized to receive two cycles of CPR with PLR followed by two cycles of CPR without PLR (Group I) or vice-versa (Group II). Subjects had their foreheads (right and left) fitted with near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) electrodes (O3 System-Masimo, Masimo corporation Forty Parker, Irvine CA) while undergoing CPR during the study. NIRS readings, a measure of mixed venous, arterial, and capillary blood oxygen saturation, act as a surrogate measure of cerebral blood perfusion during CPR.</p><p><strong>Measurement and main results: </strong>PLR was randomly used \"first\" in five of them, whereas it was used \"second\" in the remaining five subjects. In subjects in whom PLR was performed during first two cycles (Group I), NIRS values were initially significantly greater. The performance of PLR during CPR in Group II attenuated the decline in NIRS readings during CPR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PLR during CPR is feasible and leads to augmentation of cerebral blood flow. Furthermore, the expected decline in cerebral blood flow over time during CPR may be attenuated by this maneuver. The clinical significance of these findings will require further investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 4","pages":"e0880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ab/35/cc9-5-e0880.PMC10047611.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Passive leg raise (PLR) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is simple and noninvasive maneuver, which can potentially improve patient-related outcomes. Initial CPR guidelines have previously advocated "elevation of the lower extremities to augment artificial circulation during CPR." There is lack of supporting evidence for this recommendation.

Design: This was a double cross-over physiologic efficacy randomized study.

Setting and patients: Study in 10 subjects with in-hospital cardiac arrest for whom CPR was undertaken.

Intervention: Subjects were randomized to receive two cycles of CPR with PLR followed by two cycles of CPR without PLR (Group I) or vice-versa (Group II). Subjects had their foreheads (right and left) fitted with near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) electrodes (O3 System-Masimo, Masimo corporation Forty Parker, Irvine CA) while undergoing CPR during the study. NIRS readings, a measure of mixed venous, arterial, and capillary blood oxygen saturation, act as a surrogate measure of cerebral blood perfusion during CPR.

Measurement and main results: PLR was randomly used "first" in five of them, whereas it was used "second" in the remaining five subjects. In subjects in whom PLR was performed during first two cycles (Group I), NIRS values were initially significantly greater. The performance of PLR during CPR in Group II attenuated the decline in NIRS readings during CPR.

Conclusions: PLR during CPR is feasible and leads to augmentation of cerebral blood flow. Furthermore, the expected decline in cerebral blood flow over time during CPR may be attenuated by this maneuver. The clinical significance of these findings will require further investigations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究心肺复苏时被动直腿抬高对无创脑氧饱和度测定脑灌注影响的初步研究。
心肺复苏(CPR)期间被动抬腿(PLR)是一种简单且无创的操作,可以潜在地改善患者相关的结果。最初的心肺复苏术指南先前提倡“在心肺复苏术中抬高下肢以增强人工循环”。这一建议缺乏支持性证据。设计:这是一项双交叉生理疗效随机研究。环境和患者:对10例接受心肺复苏术的院内心脏骤停患者进行研究。干预:受试者被随机分为两组,一组接受有PLR的心肺复苏术,另一组接受无PLR的心肺复苏术(第一组),另一组接受无PLR的心肺复苏术(第二组)。在研究期间,受试者的前额(左、右)安装了近红外光谱(NIRS)电极(O3 System-Masimo, Masimo corporation Forty Parker, Irvine CA)。近红外光谱读数,混合静脉,动脉和毛细血管血氧饱和度的测量,作为替代测量脑血流灌注在心肺复苏术。测量及主要结果:其中5名受试者随机使用“第一”,其余5名受试者随机使用“第二”。在前两个周期进行PLR的受试者中(第一组),NIRS值最初显著更高。第二组在心肺复苏术期间PLR的表现减弱了心肺复苏术期间NIRS读数的下降。结论:心肺复苏术中PLR是可行的,可增加脑血流量。此外,在心肺复苏术中预期的脑血流量随时间的下降可能会因这种操作而减弱。这些发现的临床意义有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1