Patient education information material assessment criteria: A scoping review

IF 2.2 4区医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Health Information and Libraries Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1111/hir.12467

Khadijeh Ahmadzadeh MSc, Masoud Bahrami PhD, Firoozeh Zare-Farashbandi PhD, Payman Adibi Md-PhD, Mohammad Ali Boroumand MSc, Alireza Rahimi PhD

{"title":"Patient education information material assessment criteria: A scoping review","authors":"Khadijeh Ahmadzadeh MSc, Masoud Bahrami PhD, Firoozeh Zare-Farashbandi PhD, Payman Adibi Md-PhD, Mohammad Ali Boroumand MSc, Alireza Rahimi PhD","doi":"10.1111/hir.12467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patient education information material (PEIM) is an essential component of patient education programs in increasing patients' ability to cope with their diseases. Therefore, it is essential to consider the criteria that will be used to prepare and evaluate these resources.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This paper aims to identify these criteria and recognize the tools or methods used to evaluate them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>National and international databases and indexing banks, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, the Cochrane Library, Magiran, SID and ISC, were searched for this review. Original or review articles, theses, short surveys, and conference papers published between January 1990 and June 2022 were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 4688 documents were retrieved, of which 298 documents met the inclusion criteria. The criteria were grouped into 24 overarching criteria. The most frequently used criteria were readability, quality, suitability, comprehensibility and understandability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This review has provided empirical evidence to identify criteria, tools, techniques or methods for developing or evaluating a PEIM. The authors suggest that developing a comprehensive tool based on these findings is critical for evaluating the overall efficiency of PEIM using effective criteria.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47580,"journal":{"name":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"3-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Information and Libraries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hir.12467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Patient education information material (PEIM) is an essential component of patient education programs in increasing patients' ability to cope with their diseases. Therefore, it is essential to consider the criteria that will be used to prepare and evaluate these resources.

Objective

This paper aims to identify these criteria and recognize the tools or methods used to evaluate them.

Methods

National and international databases and indexing banks, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, the Cochrane Library, Magiran, SID and ISC, were searched for this review. Original or review articles, theses, short surveys, and conference papers published between January 1990 and June 2022 were included.

Results

Overall, 4688 documents were retrieved, of which 298 documents met the inclusion criteria. The criteria were grouped into 24 overarching criteria. The most frequently used criteria were readability, quality, suitability, comprehensibility and understandability.

Conclusion

This review has provided empirical evidence to identify criteria, tools, techniques or methods for developing or evaluating a PEIM. The authors suggest that developing a comprehensive tool based on these findings is critical for evaluating the overall efficiency of PEIM using effective criteria.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

患者教育信息材料评估标准:范围审查

背景:患者教育信息材料(PEIM)是提高患者应对疾病能力的患者教育计划的重要组成部分。因此，必须考虑将用于准备和评价这些资源的标准。目的本文旨在识别这些标准，并识别用于评估它们的工具或方法。方法检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、ProQuest、Cochrane Library、Magiran、SID和ISC等国内外数据库和索引库。包括1990年1月至2022年6月期间发表的原创或评论文章、论文、简短调查和会议论文。结果共检索文献4688篇，其中符合纳入标准的文献298篇。这些标准被分为24个总体标准。最常用的标准是可读性、质量、适用性、可理解性和可理解性。本综述为确定PEIM开发或评估的标准、工具、技术或方法提供了经验证据。作者建议，基于这些发现开发一个综合工具对于使用有效标准评估PEIM的整体效率至关重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Health Information and Libraries Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

10.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Health Information and Libraries Journal (HILJ) provides practitioners, researchers, and students in library and health professions an international and interdisciplinary forum. Its objectives are to encourage discussion and to disseminate developments at the frontiers of information management and libraries. A major focus is communicating practices that are evidence based both in managing information and in supporting health care. The Journal encompasses: - Identifying health information needs and uses - Managing programmes and services in the changing health environment - Information technology and applications in health - Educating and training health information professionals - Outreach to health user groups