Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Therapies for Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis at Induction and Maintenance: An Indirect Treatment Comparison Using Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Crohn's & Colitis 360 Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1093/crocol/otad009
Remo Panaccione, Eric B Collins, Gil Y Melmed, Severine Vermeire, Silvio Danese, Peter D R Higgins, Christina S Kwon, Wen Zhou, Dapo Ilo, Dolly Sharma, Yuri Sanchez Gonzalez, Si-Tien Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Therapies for Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis at Induction and Maintenance: An Indirect Treatment Comparison Using Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Remo Panaccione,&nbsp;Eric B Collins,&nbsp;Gil Y Melmed,&nbsp;Severine Vermeire,&nbsp;Silvio Danese,&nbsp;Peter D R Higgins,&nbsp;Christina S Kwon,&nbsp;Wen Zhou,&nbsp;Dapo Ilo,&nbsp;Dolly Sharma,&nbsp;Yuri Sanchez Gonzalez,&nbsp;Si-Tien Wang","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otad009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given rapid innovation in advanced therapies for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), we investigated their comparative efficacy and safety during induction and maintenance through network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Bayesian methods, endpoints of clinical remission and clinical response per Full Mayo score, and endoscopic improvement were assessed in bio-naive and -exposed populations. Safety was assessed in overall populations by all adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, discontinuation due to AEs, and serious infections. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials were identified via systematic literature review, including the following advanced therapies: infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, golimumab, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, filgotinib, ozanimod, and upadacitinib. Random effects models were used to address between-study heterogeneity. Intent-to-treat (ITT) efficacy rates were calculated by adjusting maintenance outcomes by likelihood of induction response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 48 trials identified, 23 were included. Across all outcomes and regardless of prior biologic exposure, ITT efficacy rates were highest for upadacitinib, owing to its highest ranking for all efficacy outcomes in induction and for all but clinical remission during maintenance among bio-naive induction responders. For all advanced therapies versus placebo, there were no significant differences in serious AEs or serious infections across therapies. For all AEs, golimumab had higher odds versus placebo during maintenance; for discontinuation due to AEs, upadacitinib had lower odds versus placebo during induction, while ustekinumab and vedolizumab had lower odds versus placebo during maintenance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Upadacitinib may be the most efficacious therapy for moderately to severely active UC based on ITT analyses, with similar safety across advanced therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10045885/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otad009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Given rapid innovation in advanced therapies for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), we investigated their comparative efficacy and safety during induction and maintenance through network meta-analysis.

Methods: Using Bayesian methods, endpoints of clinical remission and clinical response per Full Mayo score, and endoscopic improvement were assessed in bio-naive and -exposed populations. Safety was assessed in overall populations by all adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, discontinuation due to AEs, and serious infections. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials were identified via systematic literature review, including the following advanced therapies: infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, golimumab, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, filgotinib, ozanimod, and upadacitinib. Random effects models were used to address between-study heterogeneity. Intent-to-treat (ITT) efficacy rates were calculated by adjusting maintenance outcomes by likelihood of induction response.

Results: Out of 48 trials identified, 23 were included. Across all outcomes and regardless of prior biologic exposure, ITT efficacy rates were highest for upadacitinib, owing to its highest ranking for all efficacy outcomes in induction and for all but clinical remission during maintenance among bio-naive induction responders. For all advanced therapies versus placebo, there were no significant differences in serious AEs or serious infections across therapies. For all AEs, golimumab had higher odds versus placebo during maintenance; for discontinuation due to AEs, upadacitinib had lower odds versus placebo during induction, while ustekinumab and vedolizumab had lower odds versus placebo during maintenance.

Conclusions: Upadacitinib may be the most efficacious therapy for moderately to severely active UC based on ITT analyses, with similar safety across advanced therapies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先进疗法在诱导和维持中重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性:使用贝叶斯网络meta分析的间接治疗比较
背景:鉴于中重度活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的先进治疗方法快速创新,我们通过网络meta分析研究了它们在诱导和维持期间的比较疗效和安全性。方法:采用贝叶斯方法,评估生物初始和暴露人群的临床缓解和临床反应终点,以及内镜下改善。在总体人群中,通过所有不良事件(ae)、严重ae、因ae而停药和严重感染来评估安全性。通过系统文献综述确定了3期随机对照试验,包括以下先进疗法:英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、维多单抗、戈利单抗、托法替尼、乌斯特金单抗、非戈替尼、ozanimod和upadacitinib。随机效应模型用于解决研究间异质性。意向治疗(ITT)有效率通过诱导反应可能性调整维持结果来计算。结果:在确定的48项试验中,23项被纳入。在所有结果中,无论先前的生物暴露情况如何,upadacitinib的ITT有效率最高,因为它在诱导的所有疗效结果中排名最高,在生物初始诱导应答者中,除维持期间的临床缓解外,其他所有疗效结果都排名最高。与安慰剂相比,所有先进疗法在严重不良反应或严重感染方面没有显著差异。对于所有ae,在维持期间,golimumab与安慰剂相比有更高的几率;对于因ae而停药,upadacitinib在诱导期比安慰剂的几率低,而ustekinumab和vedolizumab在维持期比安慰剂的几率低。结论:根据ITT分析,Upadacitinib可能是治疗中度至重度活动性UC最有效的药物,其安全性与其他先进疗法相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Crohn's & Colitis 360
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Real-World Treatment Outcomes Associated With Early Versus Delayed Vedolizumab Initiation in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Like a Punch in the Gut: A Novel Perspective On Annual Recurrences of Ulcerative Colitis. Interventions for Adjunctive Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Permanent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review. Clinical Approach to STRIDE-II in Real-Life Settings: Analysis and Practical Recommendations. Evaluation of the Symptoms and Clinical Characteristics of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis That Affect Healthcare Providers' Treatment Choices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1