Clinical Evidence for Association of Acupuncture with Improved Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychobiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000527903
Guixing Xu, Qiwei Xiao, Biqing Huang, Hanzhou Lei, Zihan Yin, Liuyang Huang, Zhuo Zhou, Hao Tian, Fengyuan Huang, Yilin Liu, Mingsheng Sun, Ling Zhao, Fanrong Liang
{"title":"Clinical Evidence for Association of Acupuncture with Improved Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.","authors":"Guixing Xu,&nbsp;Qiwei Xiao,&nbsp;Biqing Huang,&nbsp;Hanzhou Lei,&nbsp;Zihan Yin,&nbsp;Liuyang Huang,&nbsp;Zhuo Zhou,&nbsp;Hao Tian,&nbsp;Fengyuan Huang,&nbsp;Yilin Liu,&nbsp;Mingsheng Sun,&nbsp;Ling Zhao,&nbsp;Fanrong Liang","doi":"10.1159/000527903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depression is the most significant contributor to non-fatal health reductions worldwide. Acupuncture is the most commonly used complementary alternative therapy to relieve major depressive disorder (MDD) effectively. Nevertheless, the effects of acupuncture for MDD are uncertain. This review aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Meta-analysis was performed for randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for MDD data from eight databases searched from inception until February 10, 2022. All RCTs with adult participants undergoing acupuncture treatment for MDD were included. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD). We used random-effects meta-analysis to synthesize the results with a mean difference or odds ratio. Furthermore, the potential heterogeneity was tested through meta-regression/subgroup analyses/sensitive analysis. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three studies were included: 9 acupuncture versus sham acupuncture (n = 920), 26 acupuncture versus antidepressants (n = 2169), and 9 acupuncture plus antidepressants versus antidepressants (n = 667). Of the 43 high-quality articles, 24 and 8 were determined to have a low and moderate risk of bias, respectively. The pooled results for HAMD and SDS revealed the clinical benefits of acupuncture or acupuncture plus antidepressants compared to sham acupuncture or antidepressants, with high-quality evidence. Furthermore, high-quality evidence showed that acupuncture led to fewer adverse effects than antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acupuncture or acupuncture plus antidepressants were significantly associated with reduced HAMD scores, with high-quality evidence. Also, more rigorous trials are needed to identify the optimal frequency of acupuncture for MDD and integrate such evidence into clinical care to reduce antidepressant use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Depression is the most significant contributor to non-fatal health reductions worldwide. Acupuncture is the most commonly used complementary alternative therapy to relieve major depressive disorder (MDD) effectively. Nevertheless, the effects of acupuncture for MDD are uncertain. This review aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for MDD.

Methods: Meta-analysis was performed for randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for MDD data from eight databases searched from inception until February 10, 2022. All RCTs with adult participants undergoing acupuncture treatment for MDD were included. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD). We used random-effects meta-analysis to synthesize the results with a mean difference or odds ratio. Furthermore, the potential heterogeneity was tested through meta-regression/subgroup analyses/sensitive analysis. The quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

Results: Forty-three studies were included: 9 acupuncture versus sham acupuncture (n = 920), 26 acupuncture versus antidepressants (n = 2169), and 9 acupuncture plus antidepressants versus antidepressants (n = 667). Of the 43 high-quality articles, 24 and 8 were determined to have a low and moderate risk of bias, respectively. The pooled results for HAMD and SDS revealed the clinical benefits of acupuncture or acupuncture plus antidepressants compared to sham acupuncture or antidepressants, with high-quality evidence. Furthermore, high-quality evidence showed that acupuncture led to fewer adverse effects than antidepressants.

Conclusions: Acupuncture or acupuncture plus antidepressants were significantly associated with reduced HAMD scores, with high-quality evidence. Also, more rigorous trials are needed to identify the optimal frequency of acupuncture for MDD and integrate such evidence into clinical care to reduce antidepressant use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针灸与重度抑郁症改善相关的临床证据:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:抑郁症是全世界非致命性健康减少的最重要因素。针灸是最常用的辅助替代疗法,有效缓解重度抑郁症(MDD)。然而,针灸治疗重度抑郁症的效果尚不确定。本综述旨在确定针灸治疗重度抑郁症的有效性和安全性。方法:对8个数据库中针灸治疗重度抑郁症的随机对照试验数据进行meta分析,该数据库从建立到2022年2月10日检索。所有成年受试者接受针灸治疗重度抑郁症的随机对照试验均被纳入。主要结果测量是汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD)。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析,以平均差异或优势比综合结果。此外,通过meta回归/亚组分析/敏感性分析检验潜在的异质性。每个结果的证据质量通过建议分级评估、发展和评价方法进行评估。结果:纳入43项研究:9项针灸与假针灸(n = 920), 26项针灸与抗抑郁药物(n = 2169), 9项针灸加抗抑郁药物与抗抑郁药物(n = 667)。在43篇高质量文章中,分别有24篇和8篇被确定为低偏倚风险和中等偏倚风险。HAMD和SDS的合并结果显示,与假针灸或抗抑郁药相比,针灸或针灸加抗抑郁药的临床益处具有高质量的证据。此外,高质量的证据表明,针灸导致的不良反应比抗抑郁药少。结论:针灸或针灸加抗抑郁药与降低HAMD评分显著相关,有高质量的证据。此外,需要更严格的试验来确定治疗重度抑郁症的最佳针灸频率,并将这些证据整合到临床护理中,以减少抗抑郁药的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychobiology
Neuropsychobiology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.
期刊最新文献
Front & Back Matter Clinical Evidence for Association of Acupuncture with Improved Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials. Treatment Resistance in Schizophrenia Is Associated with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Gut Microbiota: A Genetic Correlation and Mendelian Randomization Study. Modulatory Effects of Ketamine and Lamotrigine on Cognition: Emotion Interaction in the Brain. Precise Discrimination for Multiple Etiologies of Dementia Cases Based on Deep Learning with Electroencephalography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1