Utilizing clinical, pathological and radiological information to guide postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2023.2181795
Jerusha Padayachee, Simone Chaudhary, Brian Shim, Jonathan So, Remy Lim, Srinivas Raman
{"title":"Utilizing clinical, pathological and radiological information to guide postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer.","authors":"Jerusha Padayachee,&nbsp;Simone Chaudhary,&nbsp;Brian Shim,&nbsp;Jonathan So,&nbsp;Remy Lim,&nbsp;Srinivas Raman","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2023.2181795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A detectable and rising PSA following radical prostatectomy is indicative of recurrent prostate cancer. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with/without androgen deprivation therapy represents the main treatment option for these patients and has been historically associated with a biochemical control rate of ~70%. To determine the optimal timing, diagnostic workup, radiotherapy dosefractionation, treatment volume, and use of systemic therapy, several informative studies have been conducted in the last decade.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines the recent evidence to guide radiotherapy decision making in the SRT setting. Key topics include adjuvant vs salvage RT, utilization of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, length of androgen deprivation therapy, inclusion of elective pelvic volume, and emerging role for hypofractionation.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Recently reported trials, conducted in an era prior to the routine use of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, have been pivotal in establishing the current standard of care for SRT in prostate cancer. However, decisions about radiation treatment and systemic therapy may be tailored based on available prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Data from contemporary clinical trials are awaited to define and establish individualized, biomarker-driven approaches for SRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":"23 3","pages":"293-305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2023.2181795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A detectable and rising PSA following radical prostatectomy is indicative of recurrent prostate cancer. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with/without androgen deprivation therapy represents the main treatment option for these patients and has been historically associated with a biochemical control rate of ~70%. To determine the optimal timing, diagnostic workup, radiotherapy dosefractionation, treatment volume, and use of systemic therapy, several informative studies have been conducted in the last decade.

Areas covered: This review examines the recent evidence to guide radiotherapy decision making in the SRT setting. Key topics include adjuvant vs salvage RT, utilization of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, length of androgen deprivation therapy, inclusion of elective pelvic volume, and emerging role for hypofractionation.

Expert opinion: Recently reported trials, conducted in an era prior to the routine use of molecular imaging and genomic classifiers, have been pivotal in establishing the current standard of care for SRT in prostate cancer. However, decisions about radiation treatment and systemic therapy may be tailored based on available prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Data from contemporary clinical trials are awaited to define and establish individualized, biomarker-driven approaches for SRT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用临床、病理及影像学资料指导前列腺癌术后放疗。
简介:根治性前列腺切除术后可检测到的PSA升高提示前列腺癌复发。补救性放疗(SRT)加/不加雄激素剥夺治疗是这些患者的主要治疗选择,历史上与生化控制率约70%相关。为了确定最佳时间、诊断检查、放疗剂量、治疗量和全身治疗的使用,在过去十年中进行了几项翔实的研究。涵盖领域:本综述审查了指导SRT环境下放疗决策的最新证据。关键主题包括辅助与补救性RT,分子成像和基因组分类器的使用,雄激素剥夺治疗的长度,包括选择性骨盆容积,以及低分割的新作用。专家意见:最近报道的试验,在常规使用分子成像和基因组分类器之前的时代进行的,对于建立当前前列腺癌SRT的护理标准至关重要。然而,关于放射治疗和全身治疗的决定可以根据可用的预后和预测性生物标志物进行调整。等待来自当代临床试验的数据来定义和建立个体化的、生物标志物驱动的SRT方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
Unlocking survival benefits: primary tumor resection in de novo stage IV breast cancer patients. Statin use and ovarian cancer outcomes. Development of a nomogram for predicting postoperative recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using immunohistochemical and clinical parameters. Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score testing on chemotherapy selection and clinical outcomes in T3N0 luminal breast cancer. The efficacy of trastuzumab-deruxtecan for the treatment of patients with advanced HER2-low breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1