Vertebral Artery Interventions: A Comprehensive Updated Review.

IF 2.4 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Current Cardiology Reviews Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1573403X18666220317093131
Oscar Maitas, Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel, Justin Price, Abdullah Noor, Koyenum Obi, Nelson Okoh, Kiran Garikapati, Jeong Kim, Sanjida Jahan, James S Jenkins
{"title":"Vertebral Artery Interventions: A Comprehensive Updated Review.","authors":"Oscar Maitas, Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel, Justin Price, Abdullah Noor, Koyenum Obi, Nelson Okoh, Kiran Garikapati, Jeong Kim, Sanjida Jahan, James S Jenkins","doi":"10.2174/1573403X18666220317093131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with posterior circulation ischemia due to vertebral artery stenosis account for 20 to 25% of ischemic strokes and have an increased risk of recurrent stroke. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, the risk of recurrence is particularly increased in the first few weeks after symptoms occur, with an annual stroke rate of 10 to 15%. Additionally, obstructive disease of the vertebrobasilar system carries a worse prognosis, with a 30% mortality at 2-years if managed medically without additional surgical or endovascular intervention. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis are promising options widely used in clinical practice with good technical results; however, the improved clinical outcome has been examined in various clinical trials without a sufficient sample size to conclusively determine whether stenting is better than medical therapy. Surgical revascularization is an alternative approach for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis that carries a 10-20% mortality rate. Despite the advances in medical therapy and endovascular and surgical options, symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis continues to impose a high risk of stroke recurrence with associated high morbidity and mortality. This review aims to provide a focused update on the percutaneous treatment of vertebral artery stenosis, its appropriate diagnostic approach, and advances in medical therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10832,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X18666220317093131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with posterior circulation ischemia due to vertebral artery stenosis account for 20 to 25% of ischemic strokes and have an increased risk of recurrent stroke. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, the risk of recurrence is particularly increased in the first few weeks after symptoms occur, with an annual stroke rate of 10 to 15%. Additionally, obstructive disease of the vertebrobasilar system carries a worse prognosis, with a 30% mortality at 2-years if managed medically without additional surgical or endovascular intervention. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis are promising options widely used in clinical practice with good technical results; however, the improved clinical outcome has been examined in various clinical trials without a sufficient sample size to conclusively determine whether stenting is better than medical therapy. Surgical revascularization is an alternative approach for the treatment of symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis that carries a 10-20% mortality rate. Despite the advances in medical therapy and endovascular and surgical options, symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis continues to impose a high risk of stroke recurrence with associated high morbidity and mortality. This review aims to provide a focused update on the percutaneous treatment of vertebral artery stenosis, its appropriate diagnostic approach, and advances in medical therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎动脉介入治疗:一篇全面更新的综述。
由于椎动脉狭窄导致后循环缺血的患者占缺血性中风的20%至25%,并且复发性中风的风险增加。在单独接受药物治疗的患者中,在症状出现后的最初几周,复发的风险尤其增加,每年的中风率为10%至15%。此外,椎基底动脉系统阻塞性疾病的预后更差,如果在没有额外手术或血管内干预的情况下进行医学治疗,2年时死亡率为30%。症状性椎动脉狭窄的经皮腔内血管成形术和支架置入术是临床上广泛应用的有前景的选择,具有良好的技术效果;然而,在没有足够的样本量来最终确定支架置入术是否优于药物治疗的情况下,各种临床试验都对改善的临床结果进行了检查。手术血运重建是治疗症状性椎动脉狭窄的一种替代方法,死亡率为10-20%。尽管在药物治疗、血管内和手术选择方面取得了进展,但有症状的椎动脉狭窄仍然会带来中风复发的高风险,并伴有高发病率和高死亡率。这篇综述旨在对经皮治疗椎动脉狭窄、其适当的诊断方法和医学治疗进展进行重点更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Cardiology Reviews
Current Cardiology Reviews CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: Current Cardiology Reviews publishes frontier reviews of high quality on all the latest advances on the practical and clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. All relevant areas are covered by the journal including arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, drugs, methodology, pacing, and preventive cardiology. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Heart Rate Variability and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Literature. Comprehensive Review of Coronary Artery Anatomy Relevant to Cardiac Surgery. Unveiling the Complexities: Exploring Mechanisms of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity. Targeting Wnt Pathways with Small Molecules as New Approach in Cardiovascular Disease. Insulin Resistance, Hyperinsulinemia and Atherosclerosis: Insights into Pathophysiological Aspects and Future Therapeutic Prospects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1