"I've Lost My Callouses:" A Phenomenological Investigation of Music Therapists Who Left the Profession.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Music Therapy Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.1093/jmt/thac011
Michael J Silverman, Lorna E Segall, Theo Edmonds
{"title":"\"I've Lost My Callouses:\" A Phenomenological Investigation of Music Therapists Who Left the Profession.","authors":"Michael J Silverman,&nbsp;Lorna E Segall,&nbsp;Theo Edmonds","doi":"10.1093/jmt/thac011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although changing industries is common for many professionals, there is a lack of research regarding why music therapists have left the profession. The purpose of this phenomenological investigation was to explore why music therapists in the United States left the profession and understand how music therapy academic and clinical training might be applied across a range of occupational opportunities. We interviewed eight music therapists who had worked in and left the profession for employment in other industries. We used interpretative phenomenological analysis to analyze transcripts and incorporated member checking and trustworthiness to verify our findings. The first theme described how there were multiple factors that contributed to the decision to leave the music therapy profession. The second theme described how participants grappled with the decision to leave the music therapy profession. Regarding why music therapists left the profession and how their education and training were related to their new industry, we used a modified social ecological model to depict four superordinate themes (supported by 11 themes) that described (1) individual and interpersonal factors contributing to the need for occupational change; (2) music therapy skills that facilitated occupational change; (3) unmet professional expectations that contributed to occupational change; and (4) desired changes to the music therapy curriculum for greater career flexibility. Constituting an idiosyncratic process for each participant, leaving the music therapy profession was a complex and multifaceted phenomenon. Implications for education and greater career flexibility, limitations of the study, and suggestions for future research are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":47143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thac011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although changing industries is common for many professionals, there is a lack of research regarding why music therapists have left the profession. The purpose of this phenomenological investigation was to explore why music therapists in the United States left the profession and understand how music therapy academic and clinical training might be applied across a range of occupational opportunities. We interviewed eight music therapists who had worked in and left the profession for employment in other industries. We used interpretative phenomenological analysis to analyze transcripts and incorporated member checking and trustworthiness to verify our findings. The first theme described how there were multiple factors that contributed to the decision to leave the music therapy profession. The second theme described how participants grappled with the decision to leave the music therapy profession. Regarding why music therapists left the profession and how their education and training were related to their new industry, we used a modified social ecological model to depict four superordinate themes (supported by 11 themes) that described (1) individual and interpersonal factors contributing to the need for occupational change; (2) music therapy skills that facilitated occupational change; (3) unmet professional expectations that contributed to occupational change; and (4) desired changes to the music therapy curriculum for greater career flexibility. Constituting an idiosyncratic process for each participant, leaving the music therapy profession was a complex and multifaceted phenomenon. Implications for education and greater career flexibility, limitations of the study, and suggestions for future research are provided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我已经失去了老茧:”对离开这个职业的音乐治疗师的现象学调查。
虽然对于许多专业人士来说,改变行业是很常见的,但关于音乐治疗师离开这个行业的原因却缺乏研究。这项现象学调查的目的是探索为什么美国的音乐治疗师离开了这个行业,并了解音乐治疗的学术和临床培训如何应用于一系列的职业机会。我们采访了8位音乐治疗师,他们曾在这个行业工作,后来又转行到其他行业。我们使用解释性现象学分析来分析转录本,并结合成员检查和可信度来验证我们的发现。第一个主题描述了如何有多种因素促成了离开音乐治疗行业的决定。第二个主题描述了参与者如何面对离开音乐治疗行业的决定。关于音乐治疗师离开职业的原因以及他们的教育和培训如何与他们的新行业相关,我们使用了一个改进的社会生态模型来描述四个上级主题(由11个主题支持),这些主题描述了(1)个人和人际因素导致职业变化的需求;(2)音乐治疗技能促进职业转变;(3)职业期望未满足导致职业转变;(4)希望改变音乐治疗课程,以获得更大的职业灵活性。离开音乐治疗行业对每个参与者来说都是一个特殊的过程,是一个复杂而多方面的现象。最后,提出了本研究对教育和职业灵活性的启示、研究的局限性以及对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Music Therapy
Journal of Music Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Developing Music Therapy in Maternity Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study Scoping Review of Music Interventions Aimed at Improving Reading Skills in Children with Specific Learning Disorders in Reading. Telehealth Engaged Music for Pain Outcomes: A Music and Imagery Proof-of-concept Study with Veterans. Professional Development and Learning Through the Research Process. Music Therapists´ Job Satisfaction and Related Factors: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Five European Countries and Israel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1