Validation of the 4AT tool for delirium assessment in specialist palliative care settings: protocol of a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].

Elizabeth Arnold, Anne M Finucane, Juliet A Spiller, Zoë Tieges, Alasdair M J MacLullich
{"title":"Validation of the 4AT tool for delirium assessment in specialist palliative care settings: protocol of a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].","authors":"Elizabeth Arnold,&nbsp;Anne M Finucane,&nbsp;Juliet A Spiller,&nbsp;Zoë Tieges,&nbsp;Alasdair M J MacLullich","doi":"10.12688/amrcopenres.12973.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is a serious and distressing neuropsychiatric condition, which is prevalent across all palliative care settings. Hypoactive delirium is particularly common, but difficult to recognize, partly due to overlapping symptoms with depression and dementia. Delirium screening tools can lead to earlier identification and hence better management of patients. The 4AT (4 'A's Test) is a brief tool for delirium detection, designed for use in clinical practice. It has been validated in 17 studies in over 3,700 patients. The test is currently used in specialist palliative care units, but has not been validated in this setting. The aim of the study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection against a reference standard, in hospice inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>240 participants will be recruited from the inpatient units of two hospices in Scotland. If a patient lacks capacity to consent, agreement will be sought from a legal proxy. Each participant will complete the 4AT and a reference standard assessment based on the diagnostic delirium criteria in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). This will be supplemented by tests of cognition and attention, including reverse days of the week, counting down from 20 to 1, Vigilance 'A', the Observational Scale for Level of Arousal, the modified Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98. The assessments will be conducted in a randomized order by two independent clinicians, who will be blinded to the results until both are complete. Primary outcomes will be the sensitivity and specificity of the 4AT in detecting delirium.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings will inform clinical practice regarding delirium assessment in palliative care settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN ISRCTN97417474 (21/02/2020).</p>","PeriodicalId":72183,"journal":{"name":"AMRC open research","volume":"3 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7613285/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMRC open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/amrcopenres.12973.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a serious and distressing neuropsychiatric condition, which is prevalent across all palliative care settings. Hypoactive delirium is particularly common, but difficult to recognize, partly due to overlapping symptoms with depression and dementia. Delirium screening tools can lead to earlier identification and hence better management of patients. The 4AT (4 'A's Test) is a brief tool for delirium detection, designed for use in clinical practice. It has been validated in 17 studies in over 3,700 patients. The test is currently used in specialist palliative care units, but has not been validated in this setting. The aim of the study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT for delirium detection against a reference standard, in hospice inpatients.

Methods: 240 participants will be recruited from the inpatient units of two hospices in Scotland. If a patient lacks capacity to consent, agreement will be sought from a legal proxy. Each participant will complete the 4AT and a reference standard assessment based on the diagnostic delirium criteria in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). This will be supplemented by tests of cognition and attention, including reverse days of the week, counting down from 20 to 1, Vigilance 'A', the Observational Scale for Level of Arousal, the modified Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98. The assessments will be conducted in a randomized order by two independent clinicians, who will be blinded to the results until both are complete. Primary outcomes will be the sensitivity and specificity of the 4AT in detecting delirium.

Discussion: The findings will inform clinical practice regarding delirium assessment in palliative care settings.

Trial registration: ISRCTN ISRCTN97417474 (21/02/2020).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家姑息治疗环境中谵妄评估的4AT工具的验证:一项前瞻性诊断测试准确性研究方案[版本1;同行评议:[2]。
背景:谵妄是一种严重和痛苦的神经精神疾病,在所有姑息治疗机构中普遍存在。低活动性谵妄特别常见,但难以识别,部分原因是与抑郁症和痴呆症的症状重叠。谵妄筛查工具可以导致早期识别,从而更好地管理患者。4AT (4 'A's Test)是一种用于谵妄检测的简单工具,设计用于临床实践。它已在17项研究中得到验证,涉及3700多名患者。该测试目前在专科姑息治疗单位使用,但尚未在这种情况下得到验证。这项研究的目的是确定4AT诊断的准确性谵妄检测对参考标准,在安宁疗护住院病人。方法:240名参与者将从苏格兰两家临终关怀医院的住院病房招募。如果患者缺乏同意的能力,将寻求法律代理人的同意。每位参与者将根据精神疾病诊断与统计手册(DSM-5)第五版中的谵妄诊断标准完成4AT和参考标准评估。这将由认知和注意力测试补充,包括一周倒转的日子,从20倒数到1,警惕性'A',觉醒水平观察量表,修改后的里士满躁动镇静量表和谵妄评定量表-修订-98。评估将由两名独立的临床医生按随机顺序进行,在完成评估之前,他们对结果不知情。主要结果将是4AT检测谵妄的敏感性和特异性。讨论:研究结果将为姑息治疗环境中谵妄评估的临床实践提供信息。试验注册:ISRCTN ISRCTN97417474(21/02/2020)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating connections: developing an online space for cross-regional mentorship and network building in the dementia research field. Inclusion of palliative and end of life care in health strategies aimed at integrated care: a documentary analysis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on hospices: A systematic integrated review and synthesis of recommendations for policy and practice. Inclusion of palliative and end of life care in health strategies aimed at integrated care: a documentary analysis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] The dementia research career pipeline: Gender disparities in publication authorships and grant funding outcomes at different career stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1