Factors Involved in the Choice Between Thoracic and Abdominal Deep Inspiration Breath Holds During Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.

Q3 Medicine Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-20
Tatsuya Mikami, Yoshitsugu Matsumoto, Yuri Toyoda, Tsuyoshi Takazawa, Yoji Nakano, Tomomi Katsumata, Toshihisa Kuroki, Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa, Ryuta Nagao, Takeshi Akiba, Akitomo Sugawara
{"title":"Factors Involved in the Choice Between Thoracic and Abdominal Deep Inspiration Breath Holds During Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.","authors":"Tatsuya Mikami,&nbsp;Yoshitsugu Matsumoto,&nbsp;Yuri Toyoda,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Takazawa,&nbsp;Yoji Nakano,&nbsp;Tomomi Katsumata,&nbsp;Toshihisa Kuroki,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa,&nbsp;Ryuta Nagao,&nbsp;Takeshi Akiba,&nbsp;Akitomo Sugawara","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is used with adjuvant radiation therapy after left breast cancer surgery to reduce radiation dose to the heart. In this study we determined whether thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH) or abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH) should be selected based on patient background.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy plans were created under the same conditions using free breathing (FB), T-DIBH, and A-DIBH CT scans of patients who had previously undergone treatment at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A-DIBH decreased the left lung dose compared to FB. In comparing T-DIBH and A-DIBH, the heart maximum and left lung doses were significantly lower in A-DIBH. The differences in the heart mean dose (Dmean) between FB, and T-DIBH and A-DIBH were correlated with the cardiothoracic ratio, heart volume, and left lung volume. The difference in the heart Dmean and the left lung dose of T-DIBH and A-DIBH correlated with the forced vital capacity (FVC).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A-DIBH is preferable over T-DIBH with respect to the heart and left lung doses; however, with respect to the heart Dmean, T-DIBH was more effective in reducing the dose in some cases, and the FVC was a relevant factor in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":38819,"journal":{"name":"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine","volume":"48 1","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is used with adjuvant radiation therapy after left breast cancer surgery to reduce radiation dose to the heart. In this study we determined whether thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH) or abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH) should be selected based on patient background.

Methods: Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy plans were created under the same conditions using free breathing (FB), T-DIBH, and A-DIBH CT scans of patients who had previously undergone treatment at our hospital.

Results: A-DIBH decreased the left lung dose compared to FB. In comparing T-DIBH and A-DIBH, the heart maximum and left lung doses were significantly lower in A-DIBH. The differences in the heart mean dose (Dmean) between FB, and T-DIBH and A-DIBH were correlated with the cardiothoracic ratio, heart volume, and left lung volume. The difference in the heart Dmean and the left lung dose of T-DIBH and A-DIBH correlated with the forced vital capacity (FVC).

Conclusions: A-DIBH is preferable over T-DIBH with respect to the heart and left lung doses; however, with respect to the heart Dmean, T-DIBH was more effective in reducing the dose in some cases, and the FVC was a relevant factor in this study.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左乳腺癌放疗中胸腹深吸气屏气选择的影响因素。
目的:深吸气屏气术(DIBH)用于左乳腺癌手术后辅助放射治疗,以减少对心脏的放射剂量。在这项研究中,我们根据患者的背景决定是选择胸部DIBH (T-DIBH)还是腹部DIBH (A-DIBH)。方法:采用自由呼吸(FB)、T-DIBH和A-DIBH CT扫描,在相同条件下制定三维适形放射治疗方案。结果:A-DIBH较FB降低左肺剂量。对比T-DIBH和A-DIBH, A-DIBH组心脏最大剂量和左肺最大剂量显著降低。FB与T-DIBH、A-DIBH的心脏平均剂量(Dmean)差异与心胸比、心脏容积、左肺容积相关。T-DIBH和A-DIBH的心脏Dmean和左肺剂量差异与用力肺活量(FVC)相关。结论:在心脏和左肺剂量方面,A-DIBH优于T-DIBH;然而,对于心脏Dmean,在某些情况下,T-DIBH在降低剂量方面更有效,FVC是本研究的一个相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, also referred to as Tokai Journal, is an official quarterly publication of the Tokai Medical Association. Tokai Journal publishes original articles that deal with issues of clinical, experimental, socioeconomic, cultural and/or historical importance to medical science and related fields. Manuscripts may be submitted as full-length Original Articles or Brief Communications. Tokai Journal also publishes reviews and symposium proceedings. Articles accepted for publication in Tokai Journal cannot be reproduced elsewhere without written permission from the Tokai Medical Association. In addition, Tokai Journal will not be held responsible for the opinions of the authors expressed in the published articles.
期刊最新文献
A Case of Pancreatic Serous Cystadenoma Penetrating Bile Duct Requiring Differentiation from Malignancy. Adrenal Gland Metastasis of Merkel Cell Carcinoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Biopsy. Difficult Differential Diagnosis of Paraneoplastic Neuromuscular Diseases Associated with Small Cell lung Cancer: A Report of Two Cases. Difficulty Confirming the Diagnosis of Amoebic Enteritis. Efficacy of Vinblastine and Methotrexate in a Childhood Patient with Progressive Desmoid Fibromatosis of the Lower Jaw: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1