{"title":"The impact of vascular access location on pulmonary arterial pressure in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis.","authors":"Subrahmanian Sathiavageesan, Vimalraj Bogana Shanmugam, Vivek Sundaram","doi":"10.1111/sdi.13154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>It is feared that among chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) itself could contribute to pulmonary hypertension (PH). The impact of AVF location on PH is yet to be assessed. We hypothesize that patients with proximal AVF have higher access blood flow and hence higher pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) than those with distal AVF. We aimed to compare the PASP between patients with proximal and distal AVF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, PASP was estimated using Doppler echocardiography and blood flow in the AVF was assessed by Doppler ultrasound. PASP was modeled by multivariate linear regression. AVF location was the primary exposure of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 89 patients undergoing hemodialysis, 72 (81%) had PH defined as PASP >35 mmHg. The mean blood flow in proximal and distal AVF was, respectively, 1240 and 783 mL/min (mean difference 457 mL/min, p < 0.001). Mean PASP in patients with proximal AVF was 16.6 mmHg higher than those with distal AVF (p < 0.001, 95% CI 8.3-24.9). There was a positive correlation between access blood flow and PASP (r = 0.28, p = 0.007). If access blood flow was included as a covariate in the multivariate model, the association between AVF location and PASP ceased to exist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with proximal AVF have a significantly higher PASP than those with distal AVF, and this could be attributed to the higher blood flow in proximal AVF compared to distal AVF.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aim: It is feared that among chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) itself could contribute to pulmonary hypertension (PH). The impact of AVF location on PH is yet to be assessed. We hypothesize that patients with proximal AVF have higher access blood flow and hence higher pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) than those with distal AVF. We aimed to compare the PASP between patients with proximal and distal AVF.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, PASP was estimated using Doppler echocardiography and blood flow in the AVF was assessed by Doppler ultrasound. PASP was modeled by multivariate linear regression. AVF location was the primary exposure of interest.
Results: Out of 89 patients undergoing hemodialysis, 72 (81%) had PH defined as PASP >35 mmHg. The mean blood flow in proximal and distal AVF was, respectively, 1240 and 783 mL/min (mean difference 457 mL/min, p < 0.001). Mean PASP in patients with proximal AVF was 16.6 mmHg higher than those with distal AVF (p < 0.001, 95% CI 8.3-24.9). There was a positive correlation between access blood flow and PASP (r = 0.28, p = 0.007). If access blood flow was included as a covariate in the multivariate model, the association between AVF location and PASP ceased to exist.
Conclusion: Patients with proximal AVF have a significantly higher PASP than those with distal AVF, and this could be attributed to the higher blood flow in proximal AVF compared to distal AVF.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current:
-Fellows Forum
-Dialysis rounds
-Editorials
-Opinions
-Briefly noted
-Summary and Comment
-Guest Edited Issues
-Special Articles
Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide.
Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.