Ultrasound-guided PENG block versus intraarticular corticosteroid injection in hip osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Korean Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.3344/kjp.22325
Selin Guven Kose, Halil Cihan Kose, Feyza Celikel, Serkan Tulgar, Omer Taylan Akkaya
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided PENG block <i>versus</i> intraarticular corticosteroid injection in hip osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled study.","authors":"Selin Guven Kose,&nbsp;Halil Cihan Kose,&nbsp;Feyza Celikel,&nbsp;Serkan Tulgar,&nbsp;Omer Taylan Akkaya","doi":"10.3344/kjp.22325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and intra-articular injection (IAI) of steroid-bupivacaine in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis (OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After randomization, patients received either a PENG block or IAI under ultrasound-guidance. Clinical evaluations were recorded at baseline, day 1, and weeks 1, 4, and 8 post-intervention. The numerical rating scale (NRS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Harris Hip Scale (HHS) scores, pain medication use determined by a quantitative analgesic questionnaire, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were included in this study. NRS scores improved significantly for both groups during the follow-up compared to pretreatment (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with better pain scores for the PENG group (<i>P</i> < 0.001) at day 1 with larger effect size (Cohen's d = 4.62), and IAI group at 4 (Cohen's d = 5.15) and 8 (Cohen's d = 4.33) weeks (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pain medication consumption (<i>P</i> = 0.499) and patient satisfaction (<i>P</i> = 0.138) between groups. Patients in the IAI group experienced significant improvement in HHS (Cohen's d = 2.16, <i>P</i> = 0.007) and WOMAC (Cohen's d = 1.02, <i>P</i> = 0.036) scores at 8 weeks compared to the PENG group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ultrasound-guided PENG block provides effective pain relief which improves functionality and quality of life in hip OA patients up to 2 months. The PENG block can be considered an easy, safe, and useful alternative treatment modality for hip OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":56252,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pain","volume":"36 2","pages":"195-207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/6c/kjp-36-2-195.PMC10043791.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.22325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and intra-articular injection (IAI) of steroid-bupivacaine in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: After randomization, patients received either a PENG block or IAI under ultrasound-guidance. Clinical evaluations were recorded at baseline, day 1, and weeks 1, 4, and 8 post-intervention. The numerical rating scale (NRS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Harris Hip Scale (HHS) scores, pain medication use determined by a quantitative analgesic questionnaire, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

Results: Sixty patients were included in this study. NRS scores improved significantly for both groups during the follow-up compared to pretreatment (P < 0.001), with better pain scores for the PENG group (P < 0.001) at day 1 with larger effect size (Cohen's d = 4.62), and IAI group at 4 (Cohen's d = 5.15) and 8 (Cohen's d = 4.33) weeks (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pain medication consumption (P = 0.499) and patient satisfaction (P = 0.138) between groups. Patients in the IAI group experienced significant improvement in HHS (Cohen's d = 2.16, P = 0.007) and WOMAC (Cohen's d = 1.02, P = 0.036) scores at 8 weeks compared to the PENG group.

Conclusions: The ultrasound-guided PENG block provides effective pain relief which improves functionality and quality of life in hip OA patients up to 2 months. The PENG block can be considered an easy, safe, and useful alternative treatment modality for hip OA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导的彭阻滞与关节内皮质类固醇注射治疗髋关节骨关节炎:一项随机对照研究
背景:本研究旨在比较包膜神经组(PENG)阻滞和关节内注射(IAI)类固醇布比卡因治疗髋关节骨性关节炎(OA)的疗效。方法:随机分组后,患者在超声引导下接受PENG阻滞或IAI。在基线、干预后第1天、第1周、第4周和第8周记录临床评估。评估数值评定量表(NRS)、西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)、哈里斯髋关节量表(HHS)评分、定量镇痛问卷确定的止痛药使用情况以及患者满意度。结果:60例患者纳入本研究。随访期间,两组患者的NRS评分均较治疗前显著提高(P < 0.001),彭组患者在第1天疼痛评分较好(P < 0.001),效应量较大(Cohen’s d = 4.62), IAI组患者在第4周(Cohen’s d = 5.15)和第8周(Cohen’s d = 4.33) (P < 0.001)。两组患者止痛药用量(P = 0.499)和患者满意度(P = 0.138)差异无统计学意义。与PENG组相比,IAI组患者在8周时HHS (Cohen’s d = 2.16, P = 0.007)和WOMAC (Cohen’s d = 1.02, P = 0.036)评分显著改善。结论:超声引导的PENG阻滞可有效缓解疼痛,改善髋关节OA患者长达2个月的功能和生活质量。彭阻滞可以被认为是髋关节OA的一种简单、安全、有用的替代治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pain
Korean Journal of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Korean Journal of Pain (Korean J Pain, KJP) is the official journal of the Korean Pain Society, founded in 1986. It has been published since 1988. It publishes peer reviewed original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. It has been published quarterly in English since 2009 (on the first day of January, April, July, and October). In addition, it has also become the official journal of the International Spinal Pain Society since 2016. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals. The circulation number per issue is 50.
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pain management: pros, cons, and benefits for the Philippines. Retraction: Comparison of the efficacy of genicular nerve phenol neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation for pain management in patients with knee osteoarthritis. A critical factor in resistant piriformis syndrome cases: awareness of sacrotuberous ligament pain. Effect of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block on chronic pain in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia surgery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized double-blind study. Ultrasound-guided transoral pterygopalatine fossa block: cadaveric elaboration of a novel technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1