Time to evacuation of acute subdural and extradural haematoma: prospective study before and after implementation of a major trauma centre.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY British Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1080/02688697.2023.2173723
Patrick Holton, Ardalan Zolnourian, Diederik Bulters
{"title":"Time to evacuation of acute subdural and extradural haematoma: prospective study before and after implementation of a major trauma centre.","authors":"Patrick Holton, Ardalan Zolnourian, Diederik Bulters","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2023.2173723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b><i>:</i> Patients with Extradural (EDH) and Acute Subdural Haematomas (ASDH) represent a subgroup of head-injured patients that gain the most from timely treatment. While treatment times for head injury overall improved since the introduction of Major Trauma Centres (MTCs), no data exists describing how the time to treatment of EDH and ASDH has changed. We, therefore, compared the evacuation of ASDH and EDH before and after the implementation of a major trauma network.<b>Methods</b><i>:</i> Data was collected prospectively between 1 May 2006 to 31 May 2007 and 1 March 2014 to 31 March 2016. The study was carried out at University Hospital Southampton, designated MTC in 2012. Patients over 18 with ASDH or EDH requiring emergency surgery were included.<b>Results</b><i>:</i> The median time (IQR) for decompression was 4.8h (3.9-6.6) in 2006-7 and 4.4h (3.4-5.9) in 2014-16, <i>p</i> = 0.386. The proportion treated within 4 hours was 32% in 2006-7, and 33% in 2014-16 (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Analysis showed a decrease in time for CT scan (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and acceptance by neurosurgery (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were increases in time for transferring to hospital (<i>p</i> = 0.005), awaiting operating theatre (<i>p</i> = 0.005), and operative time (<i>p</i> = 0.018).<b>Conclusions</b><i>:</i> Since the introduction of MTCs, there has been no significant reduction in time to treat this select group of patients despite reductions in time to treatment of most other trauma and head-injured patients. This may be because parts of the pathway have improved, but others haven't. It is also possible that while previously head injury was poorly served, resources were prioritised to this group so finding further gains is difficult.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2173723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with Extradural (EDH) and Acute Subdural Haematomas (ASDH) represent a subgroup of head-injured patients that gain the most from timely treatment. While treatment times for head injury overall improved since the introduction of Major Trauma Centres (MTCs), no data exists describing how the time to treatment of EDH and ASDH has changed. We, therefore, compared the evacuation of ASDH and EDH before and after the implementation of a major trauma network.Methods: Data was collected prospectively between 1 May 2006 to 31 May 2007 and 1 March 2014 to 31 March 2016. The study was carried out at University Hospital Southampton, designated MTC in 2012. Patients over 18 with ASDH or EDH requiring emergency surgery were included.Results: The median time (IQR) for decompression was 4.8h (3.9-6.6) in 2006-7 and 4.4h (3.4-5.9) in 2014-16, p = 0.386. The proportion treated within 4 hours was 32% in 2006-7, and 33% in 2014-16 (p = 1.000). Analysis showed a decrease in time for CT scan (p = 0.01) and acceptance by neurosurgery (p < 0.001). There were increases in time for transferring to hospital (p = 0.005), awaiting operating theatre (p = 0.005), and operative time (p = 0.018).Conclusions: Since the introduction of MTCs, there has been no significant reduction in time to treat this select group of patients despite reductions in time to treatment of most other trauma and head-injured patients. This may be because parts of the pathway have improved, but others haven't. It is also possible that while previously head injury was poorly served, resources were prioritised to this group so finding further gains is difficult.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性硬膜下和硬膜外血肿的排空时间:在主要创伤中心实施前后的前瞻性研究。
目的:硬脑膜外血肿(EDH)和急性硬脑膜下血肿(ASDH)患者是头部受伤患者中的一个亚群,他们从及时治疗中获益最多。虽然自重症创伤中心(MTC)成立以来,头部创伤的治疗时间总体上有所改善,但没有数据能说明治疗硬膜外血肿和急性硬膜下血肿的时间发生了怎样的变化。因此,我们比较了重大创伤网络建立前后 ASDH 和 EDH 的撤离情况:数据收集时间为 2006 年 5 月 1 日至 2007 年 5 月 31 日和 2014 年 3 月 1 日至 2016 年 3 月 31 日。研究在南安普顿大学医院进行,该医院于 2012 年被指定为 MTC。研究对象包括18岁以上需要进行急诊手术的ASDH或EDH患者:2006-7年减压时间的中位数(IQR)为4.8小时(3.9-6.6),2014-16年为4.4小时(3.4-5.9),P = 0.386。2006-7年在4小时内接受治疗的比例为32%,2014-16年为33%(p = 1.000)。分析表明,CT扫描时间缩短(p = 0.01),神经外科接受时间缩短(p = 0.005),等待手术室时间缩短(p = 0.005),手术时间缩短(p = 0.018):结论:自引入多学科综合治疗中心以来,尽管大多数其他创伤和头部受伤患者的治疗时间有所缩短,但这部分患者的治疗时间并没有明显缩短。这可能是因为治疗路径的某些部分有所改善,而其他部分却没有。也有可能是因为以前头部创伤的治疗效果不佳,资源被优先用于这部分患者,因此很难取得进一步的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
期刊最新文献
Management of brain tumour related epilepsy (BTRE): a narrative review and therapy recommendations. Obstructive hydrocephalus due to an enlarged massa intermedia treated with endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Time to evacuation of acute subdural and extradural haematoma: prospective study before and after implementation of a major trauma centre. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion - clinical outcomes, fusion rates and complications with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Artificial intelligence and the potential for perioperative delabeling of penicillin allergies for neurosurgery inpatients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1