Realignment Surgery for Failed Osteochondral Autologous Transplantation in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Associated With Malalignment.

Abstract

Background: While osteochondral autologous transplantation (OAT) offers favorable results in most patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT), some patients continue to experience persistent pain following the procedure. Information regarding the etiology of this pain and outcomes of revision surgery are limited. This study aimed to report results of revision surgery with realignment procedures in patients with failed OAT who demonstrated concomitant malalignment at the distal tibia or hindfoot.

Methods: Eight patients (8 ankles), who had been experiencing persistent pain for more than 1 year following OAT, underwent realignment procedures during revision surgery. All patients underwent primary OAT for the treatment of medial OLTs. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the main location of deformity: the supramalleolar realignment group (SRG, 5 ankles) and the hindfoot realignment group (HRG, 3 ankles). No direct procedure was performed on the osteochondral lesion at the time of revision surgery. Ankle and hindfoot alignment were evaluated using 6 parameters in weightbearing radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) was used to assess for medial gutter narrowing, spur formation, and cyst volume around transplanted osteochondral plug preoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Foot Function Index and Visual Analogue Scale.

Results: All patients had medial gutter narrowing or spur formation, which are early signs of ankle arthritis. The SRG had varus distal tibial alignment with a median medial distal tibial angle of 85.7 degrees (interquartile range [IQR], 3.2). The HRG had valgus hindfoot alignment and a lower medial longitudinal arch with a median hindfoot moment arm of 8.4 mm (IQR, 6.1) and a median Meary's angle of 11.8 degrees (IQR, 1.4). Spontaneous restoration of the osteochondral lesion was observed after realignment surgery, with cyst volume decreasing from 0.2592 to 0.0873 cm³ (P < .05). Clinical scores improved in all patients.

Conclusion: The current study demonstrates the effectiveness of realignment surgery in a selected patient group who experienced persistent pain and showed radiographic evidence of malalignment after primary OAT. Our study provides evidence supporting the use of realignment procedures in these cases, with results indicating improved patient-reported outcomes and spontaneous restoration of osteochondral lesions.

Levels of evidence: Level IV: Case series.