Cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the Danish version of the brief version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1002/pri.2004

Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson, Søren Thorgaard Skou, Morten Haugaard Pape, Rogerio Pessoto Hirata, Trine Rafn, Pablo Bellosta-López, Steffan Wittrup McPhee Christensen

{"title":"Cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the Danish version of the brief version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory.","authors":"Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson, Søren Thorgaard Skou, Morten Haugaard Pape, Rogerio Pessoto Hirata, Trine Rafn, Pablo Bellosta-López, Steffan Wittrup McPhee Christensen","doi":"10.1002/pri.2004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Personality traits are associated with pain-related beliefs and coping strategies, and different chronic conditions are linked through specific personality profiles. This highlights the importance of having valid and reliable measures of personality traits for use in clinical and research settings when assessing patients in chronic pain.Purpose: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the 10-item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10) into Danish.Methods: A bilingual expert panel (N = 4) and a panel of laymen (N = 8) translated and culturally adapted the questionnaire into Danish. Face validity was evaluated in a group of persons suffering from recurring or ongoing painful conditions (N = 9). Data were collected to evaluate the internal consistency, test-retest reliability and factor structure (N = 96).Results: Some of the participants in the lay panel considered the questionnaire too short, considering its aim of assessing personality. Acceptable internal consistency was found for two out of five subscales (0.78 for both Extraversion and Neuroticism), while the internal consistency was non-acceptable for the remaining subscales (0.17-0.45). Test-retest reliability was acceptable for three subscales (0.80 for Neuroticism, 0.84 for Conscientiousness, and 0.85 for Extraversion). Assumptions for determining the factor structure were not met and therefore was this analysis omitted.Discussion: Although face valid, only two out of five subscales had acceptable internal consistency and only three subscales had acceptable test-retest reliability. These findings indicate that interpreting findings regarding personality using the Danish BFI-10 should be done with caution.","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":" ","pages":"e2004"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Personality traits are associated with pain-related beliefs and coping strategies, and different chronic conditions are linked through specific personality profiles. This highlights the importance of having valid and reliable measures of personality traits for use in clinical and research settings when assessing patients in chronic pain.

Purpose: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the 10-item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10) into Danish.

Methods: A bilingual expert panel (N = 4) and a panel of laymen (N = 8) translated and culturally adapted the questionnaire into Danish. Face validity was evaluated in a group of persons suffering from recurring or ongoing painful conditions (N = 9). Data were collected to evaluate the internal consistency, test-retest reliability and factor structure (N = 96).

Results: Some of the participants in the lay panel considered the questionnaire too short, considering its aim of assessing personality. Acceptable internal consistency was found for two out of five subscales (0.78 for both Extraversion and Neuroticism), while the internal consistency was non-acceptable for the remaining subscales (0.17-0.45). Test-retest reliability was acceptable for three subscales (0.80 for Neuroticism, 0.84 for Conscientiousness, and 0.85 for Extraversion). Assumptions for determining the factor structure were not met and therefore was this analysis omitted.

Discussion: Although face valid, only two out of five subscales had acceptable internal consistency and only three subscales had acceptable test-retest reliability. These findings indicate that interpreting findings regarding personality using the Danish BFI-10 should be done with caution.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

跨文化翻译和改编丹麦版的十项大五量表的简要版本。

背景:人格特征与疼痛相关的信念和应对策略有关，不同的慢性疾病通过特定的人格特征联系在一起。这突出了在临床和研究中评估慢性疼痛患者时，有效和可靠的人格特征测量方法的重要性。目的:将十项大五量表(BFI-10)翻译成丹麦语并进行跨文化适应。方法:一个双语专家小组(N = 4)和一个外行小组(N = 8)将问卷翻译成丹麦语并进行文化调整。对一组反复或持续疼痛的患者(N = 9)进行面部效度评估。收集数据以评估内部一致性、重测信度和因素结构(N = 96)。结果:一些外行小组的参与者认为问卷太短，考虑到其评估人格的目的。五个子量表中有两个的内部一致性是可接受的(外向性和神经质性都是0.78)，而其余子量表的内部一致性是不可接受的(0.17-0.45)。三个分量表的重测信度是可接受的(神经质0.80，尽责性0.84，外向性0.85)。确定因素结构的假设不满足，因此该分析被省略。讨论:虽然表面有效，但五个子量表中只有两个具有可接受的内部一致性，只有三个子量表具有可接受的测试-重测信度。这些发现表明，使用丹麦BFI-10来解释有关人格的发现应该谨慎。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Physiotherapy Research International REHABILITATION-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.