A quiet place: The impact of the word "quiet" on clinical workload.

Q2 Medicine World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2022-04-17 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1002/wjo2.53
Beatrice C Go, Kevin Chorath, Amy Schettino, Vincent Anagnos, Ivy Maina, Laura Henry, Lukas Dumberger, Neel Sangal, Vasiliki Triantafillou, Solomon Husain, Chad Sudoko, Evan Cretney, Karthik Rajasekaran
{"title":"A quiet place: The impact of the word \"quiet\" on clinical workload.","authors":"Beatrice C Go, Kevin Chorath, Amy Schettino, Vincent Anagnos, Ivy Maina, Laura Henry, Lukas Dumberger, Neel Sangal, Vasiliki Triantafillou, Solomon Husain, Chad Sudoko, Evan Cretney, Karthik Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the impact of uttering the word \"quiet\" on clinical workload during the overnight otolaryngology call shift and understand the factors contributing to resident busyness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicenter, single-blind, randomized-controlled trial was conducted. A total of 80 overnight call shifts covered by a pool of 10 residents were randomized to the quiet or to the control group. At the start of shift, residents were asked to state aloud, \"Today will be a quiet night\" (quiet group) or \"Today will be a good night\" (control group). Clinical workload, as measured by number of consults, was the primary outcome. Secondary measures included number of sign-out tasks, unplanned inpatient and operating room visits, number of phone calls and hours of sleep, and self-perceived busyness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in the number of total (<i>P</i> = 0.23), nonurgent (<i>P</i> = 0.18), and urgent (<i>P</i> = 0.18) consults. Tasks at signout, total phone calls, unplanned inpatient visits, and unplanned operating room visits did not differ between the control and quiet groups. While there were more unplanned operating room visits in the quiet group (29, 80.6%) compared to the control group (34, 94.4%), this was not found to be significant (<i>P</i> = 0.07). The majority of residents reported feeling \"not busy\" during control nights (18, 50.0%) compared to feeling \"somewhat busy\" during quiet nights (17, 47.2%; <i>P</i> = 0.42).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contrary to popular belief, there is no clear evidence that uttering the word \"quiet\" significantly increases clinical workload.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":"91-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/30/WJO2-9-91.PMC10050957.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the impact of uttering the word "quiet" on clinical workload during the overnight otolaryngology call shift and understand the factors contributing to resident busyness.

Materials and methods: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized-controlled trial was conducted. A total of 80 overnight call shifts covered by a pool of 10 residents were randomized to the quiet or to the control group. At the start of shift, residents were asked to state aloud, "Today will be a quiet night" (quiet group) or "Today will be a good night" (control group). Clinical workload, as measured by number of consults, was the primary outcome. Secondary measures included number of sign-out tasks, unplanned inpatient and operating room visits, number of phone calls and hours of sleep, and self-perceived busyness.

Results: There was no difference in the number of total (P = 0.23), nonurgent (P = 0.18), and urgent (P = 0.18) consults. Tasks at signout, total phone calls, unplanned inpatient visits, and unplanned operating room visits did not differ between the control and quiet groups. While there were more unplanned operating room visits in the quiet group (29, 80.6%) compared to the control group (34, 94.4%), this was not found to be significant (P = 0.07). The majority of residents reported feeling "not busy" during control nights (18, 50.0%) compared to feeling "somewhat busy" during quiet nights (17, 47.2%; P = 0.42).

Conclusion: Contrary to popular belief, there is no clear evidence that uttering the word "quiet" significantly increases clinical workload.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安静的地方安静 "一词对临床工作量的影响。
目的:本研究旨在确定在耳鼻喉科通宵值班期间,说出 "安静 "一词对临床工作量的影响,并了解导致住院医师忙碌的因素:进行了一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。10名住院医师共承担了80个通宵值班,他们被随机分配到安静组或对照组。轮班开始时,住院医生被要求大声说出 "今天将是一个安静的夜晚"(安静组)或 "今天将是一个美好的夜晚"(对照组)。临床工作量(以会诊次数衡量)是主要结果。次要测量指标包括签出任务数、非计划住院和手术室就诊次数、电话数、睡眠时间以及自我感觉的忙碌程度:结果:总咨询次数(P = 0.23)、非紧急咨询次数(P = 0.18)和紧急咨询次数(P = 0.18)均无差异。对照组和安静组在签出时的任务、电话总数、非计划住院人次和非计划手术室人次方面没有差异。虽然与对照组(34 人,94.4%)相比,安静组(29 人,80.6%)的非计划手术室就诊人数更多,但这一差异并不显著(P = 0.07)。大多数住院医师表示在对照组夜间感觉 "不忙"(18 人,50.0%),而在安静组夜间感觉 "有点忙"(17 人,47.2%;P = 0.42):结论:与普遍的看法相反,没有明确的证据表明说出 "安静 "一词会显著增加临床工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Author Guidelines. Author Guidelines. Long COVID: From olfactory dysfunctions to viral Parkinsonism. Author Guidelines. Epidemiological and histopathological characteristics of thyroid carcinoma in a Tunisian health care center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1