What is the best treatment for syndesmosis fixation? Suture-button or syndesmotic screw ? Bilateral CT-based early postoperative analysis

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2022.12.003
Servet İğrek , İbrahim Ulusoy
{"title":"What is the best treatment for syndesmosis fixation? Suture-button or syndesmotic screw ? Bilateral CT-based early postoperative analysis","authors":"Servet İğrek ,&nbsp;İbrahim Ulusoy","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2022.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of syndesmotic screw (SS) and suture button (SB) on the reduction and fixation of syndesmosis via early postoperative bilateral computed tomography (CT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center retrospective study included 76 patients aged ≥ 18 years with a unilateral syndesmosis injury. SS was applied to 40 patients and SB to 36 patients. The differences between the sides stabilized using SB or SS and the intact sides were analyzed using the parameters of tibio-fibular clear space (∆CS) and anterior or posterior sagittal translation (∆ST) depending on the orientation of the fibula. The cases in which the fibula was translocated to the posterior of the tibia after the change of ∆ST and ∆CS&gt; 2 mm were evaluated as malreduction. Axial CT images taken from the level of syndesmosis fixation were divided into 4 zones according to the orientation angle of the implant sent from the fibula to the tibia.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference was found in the analyses performed between total patient group with malreduction and fixation groups in terms of ∆CS and ∆ST values (p = 0.708, p = 0.289). It was observed that the fixation material was in zone 3 in 54 patients and in zone 2 in 22 patients. No significant difference was found in the analyses performed between the SS and SB groups according to the implant zone (p = 0.191). In the SS group sent from Zone 2, the malreduction rate according to the ∆ST value of syndesmosis was found to be significantly higher than in the SB group (p = 0.008, p = 0.003).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When the implant is applied with the correct technique, there is no difference between SS and SB in terms of early postoperative reduction. When the SS is advanced at an inappropriate angle, it negatively affects the reduction of the fibula, while SB can better tolerate angle errors up to certain degrees due to its flexible structure. Therefore, it can be presumed that the suture button system is a more convenient method in the reduction and fixation of syndesmosis than the syndesmotic screw.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773122002375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of syndesmotic screw (SS) and suture button (SB) on the reduction and fixation of syndesmosis via early postoperative bilateral computed tomography (CT).

Methods

This single-center retrospective study included 76 patients aged ≥ 18 years with a unilateral syndesmosis injury. SS was applied to 40 patients and SB to 36 patients. The differences between the sides stabilized using SB or SS and the intact sides were analyzed using the parameters of tibio-fibular clear space (∆CS) and anterior or posterior sagittal translation (∆ST) depending on the orientation of the fibula. The cases in which the fibula was translocated to the posterior of the tibia after the change of ∆ST and ∆CS> 2 mm were evaluated as malreduction. Axial CT images taken from the level of syndesmosis fixation were divided into 4 zones according to the orientation angle of the implant sent from the fibula to the tibia.

Results

No significant difference was found in the analyses performed between total patient group with malreduction and fixation groups in terms of ∆CS and ∆ST values (p = 0.708, p = 0.289). It was observed that the fixation material was in zone 3 in 54 patients and in zone 2 in 22 patients. No significant difference was found in the analyses performed between the SS and SB groups according to the implant zone (p = 0.191). In the SS group sent from Zone 2, the malreduction rate according to the ∆ST value of syndesmosis was found to be significantly higher than in the SB group (p = 0.008, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

When the implant is applied with the correct technique, there is no difference between SS and SB in terms of early postoperative reduction. When the SS is advanced at an inappropriate angle, it negatively affects the reduction of the fibula, while SB can better tolerate angle errors up to certain degrees due to its flexible structure. Therefore, it can be presumed that the suture button system is a more convenient method in the reduction and fixation of syndesmosis than the syndesmotic screw.

Level of Evidence

Level IV

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合固定的最佳治疗方法是什么?缝合按钮还是联合螺钉?术后早期双侧ct分析
本研究的目的是通过术后早期双侧计算机断层扫描(CT)比较韧带联合螺钉(SS)和缝合扣(SB)对韧带联合复位和固定的有效性。方法本研究纳入76例年龄≥18岁的单侧韧带联合损伤患者。SS 40例,SB 36例。根据腓骨的方向,使用胫腓骨间隙(∆CS)和前后矢状面平移(∆ST)参数分析SB或SS稳定侧与完整侧之间的差异。∆ST和∆CS>改变后腓骨向胫骨后侧移位的病例;2 mm评估为复位不良。根据假体从腓骨到胫骨的方向角度,从关节联合固定水平取轴向CT图像分为4个区。结果复位不良组与固定组的∆CS和∆ST值无显著性差异(p = 0.708, p = 0.289)。观察到固定材料位于3区54例,2区22例。根据种植区,SS组和SB组之间的分析结果无显著差异(p = 0.191)。从2区送出的SS组,根据关节联合的∆ST值,发现复位不良率明显高于SB组(p = 0.008, p = 0.003)。结论采用正确的种植技术,SS和SB在术后早期复位方面没有差异。当SS以不合适的角度前进时,会对腓骨的复位产生负面影响,而SB由于其灵活的结构,在一定程度上可以更好地容忍角度误差。因此,可以推测缝合扣系统是一种比联合螺钉更方便的复位和固定联合的方法。证据等级:四级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Biomechanical consequences of Zadek osteotomy in insertional achilles tendinopathy: A virtual surgical simulation study". A comparative biomechanical study of the krackow suture technique with three common percutaneous suture techniques in the treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures Ankle fractures with Chaput fragment: A new classification system with insights into morphology and relation to surgical treatment A morphological review of medial malleolar fractures – A large single centre series Minimally invasive Dorsal cheilectomy and Hallux metatarsophalangeal joint arthroscopy for the treatment of Hallux Rigidus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1