Is loss avoidance differentially rewarding in adolescents versus adults? Differences in ventral striatum and anterior insula activation during the anticipation of potential monetary losses.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/17588928.2022.2038555
Maria Bretzke, Nora C Vetter, Gregor Kohls, Hannes Wahl, Veit Roessner, Michael M Plichta, Judith Buse
{"title":"Is loss avoidance differentially rewarding in adolescents versus adults? Differences in ventral striatum and anterior insula activation during the anticipation of potential monetary losses.","authors":"Maria Bretzke,&nbsp;Nora C Vetter,&nbsp;Gregor Kohls,&nbsp;Hannes Wahl,&nbsp;Veit Roessner,&nbsp;Michael M Plichta,&nbsp;Judith Buse","doi":"10.1080/17588928.2022.2038555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Avoiding loss is a crucial, adaptive guide to human behavior. While previous developmental research has primarily focused on gaining rewards, less attention has been paid to loss processing and its avoidance. In daily life, it is often unknown how likely an action will result in a loss, making the role of uncertainty in loss processing particularly important. By using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated the influence of varying outcome probabilities (12%, 34%, and 67%) on brain regions implicated in loss processing (ventral striatum (VS), anterior insula (AI)) by comparing 28 adolescents (10-18 years) and 24 adults (22-32 years) during the anticipation of potential monetary loss.Overall, results revealed slower RTs in adolescents compared to adults with both groups being faster in the experimental (monetary condition) vs. control trials (verbal condition). Fastest RTs were observed for the 67% outcome probability in both age groups. An age group × outcome probability interaction effect revealed the greatest differences between the groups for the 12% vs. the 67% outcome probability. Neurally, both age groups demonstrated a higher percent signal change in the VS and AI during the anticipation of potential monetary loss versus the verbal condition. However, adults demonstrated an even greater activation of VS and AI than adolescents during the anticipation of potential monetary loss, but not during the verbal condition. This may indicate that adolescents differ from adults regarding their experience of avoiding losing monetary rewards.</p>","PeriodicalId":10413,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"14 1","pages":"36-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2022.2038555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Avoiding loss is a crucial, adaptive guide to human behavior. While previous developmental research has primarily focused on gaining rewards, less attention has been paid to loss processing and its avoidance. In daily life, it is often unknown how likely an action will result in a loss, making the role of uncertainty in loss processing particularly important. By using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated the influence of varying outcome probabilities (12%, 34%, and 67%) on brain regions implicated in loss processing (ventral striatum (VS), anterior insula (AI)) by comparing 28 adolescents (10-18 years) and 24 adults (22-32 years) during the anticipation of potential monetary loss.Overall, results revealed slower RTs in adolescents compared to adults with both groups being faster in the experimental (monetary condition) vs. control trials (verbal condition). Fastest RTs were observed for the 67% outcome probability in both age groups. An age group × outcome probability interaction effect revealed the greatest differences between the groups for the 12% vs. the 67% outcome probability. Neurally, both age groups demonstrated a higher percent signal change in the VS and AI during the anticipation of potential monetary loss versus the verbal condition. However, adults demonstrated an even greater activation of VS and AI than adolescents during the anticipation of potential monetary loss, but not during the verbal condition. This may indicate that adolescents differ from adults regarding their experience of avoiding losing monetary rewards.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在青少年和成人中,避免损失是否有不同的回报?预期潜在金钱损失时腹侧纹状体和脑岛前部激活的差异。
避免损失是人类行为的关键、适应性指南。虽然以前的发展研究主要集中在获得奖励,但对损失处理及其避免的关注较少。在日常生活中,人们往往不知道某一行为导致损失的可能性有多大,这使得不确定性在损失处理中的作用尤为重要。通过对28名青少年(10-18岁)和24名成年人(22-32岁)在预期潜在的金钱损失时进行比较,研究了不同结果概率(12%、34%和67%)对涉及损失处理的大脑区域(腹侧纹状体(VS)、岛叶前部(AI))的影响。总的来说,结果显示青少年的即时反应速度比成年人慢,两组在实验(货币条件)中都比对照试验(语言条件)快。在两个年龄组中,观察到最快的RTs结果概率为67%。年龄组与结果概率的相互作用效应显示,12%与67%的结果概率组间差异最大。从神经上讲,在预期潜在的金钱损失时,两个年龄组的VS和AI信号变化的百分比都高于语言条件。然而,在预期潜在的金钱损失时,成年人比青少年表现出更大的VS和AI激活,但在语言条件下则没有。这可能表明青少年与成年人在避免失去金钱奖励的经验上有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuroscience publishes high quality discussion papers and empirical papers on any topic in the field of cognitive neuroscience including perception, attention, memory, language, action, social cognition, and executive function. The journal covers findings based on a variety of techniques such as fMRI, ERPs, MEG, TMS, and focal lesion studies. Contributions that employ or discuss multiple techniques to shed light on the spatial-temporal brain mechanisms underlying a cognitive process are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Visuo-spatial working memory abilities modulate mental rotation: Evidence from event-related potentials. Theoretical strategies for an embodied cognitive neuroscience: Mechanistic explanations of brain-body-environment systems. Beyond embodiment: Rethinking the integration of cognitive neuroscience and mechanistic explanations. Embodied (4EA) cognitive computational neuroscience. How to build a better 4E cognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1