Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy-based interventions for maternal perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI:10.1186/s12888-023-04547-9
Danelle Pettman, Heather O'Mahen, Oscar Blomberg, Agneta Skoog Svanberg, Louise von Essen, Joanne Woodford
{"title":"Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy-based interventions for maternal perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Danelle Pettman, Heather O'Mahen, Oscar Blomberg, Agneta Skoog Svanberg, Louise von Essen, Joanne Woodford","doi":"10.1186/s12888-023-04547-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression during the perinatal period (during pregnancy and the year after childbirth) is common and associated with a range of negative effects for mothers, infants, family members, and wider society. Although existing evidence suggests cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) based interventions are effective for perinatal depression, less is known about the effect of CBT-based interventions on important secondary outcomes, and a number of potential clinical and methodological moderators have not been examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis primarily examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of depression. Secondary aims examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of anxiety, stress, parenting, perceived social support, and perceived parental competence; and explored clinical and methodological moderators potentially associated with effectiveness. A systematic search of electronic databases and other sources was performed up to November 2021. We included randomized controlled trials comparing CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression with control conditions allowing for the isolation of the effects of CBT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 31 studies (5291 participants) were included in the systematic review and 26 studies (4658 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size was medium (hedges g = - 0.53 [95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.40]); with high heterogeneity. Significant effects were also found for anxiety, individual stress, and perceived social support, however few studies examined secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis identified type of control, type of CBT, and type of health professional as significant moderators of the main effect (symptoms of depression). Some concerns of risk of bias were present in the majority of studies and one study had a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBT-based interventions for depression during the perinatal period appear effective, however results should be interpreted with caution given high levels of heterogeneity and low quality of included studies. There is a need to further investigate possibly important clinical moderators of effect, including the type of health professional delivering interventions. Further, results indicate a need to establish a minimum core data set to improve the consistency of secondary outcome collection across trials and to design and conduct trials with longer-term follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CRD42020152254 .</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"23 1","pages":"208"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10052839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04547-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depression during the perinatal period (during pregnancy and the year after childbirth) is common and associated with a range of negative effects for mothers, infants, family members, and wider society. Although existing evidence suggests cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) based interventions are effective for perinatal depression, less is known about the effect of CBT-based interventions on important secondary outcomes, and a number of potential clinical and methodological moderators have not been examined.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis primarily examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of depression. Secondary aims examined the effectiveness of CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression on symptoms of anxiety, stress, parenting, perceived social support, and perceived parental competence; and explored clinical and methodological moderators potentially associated with effectiveness. A systematic search of electronic databases and other sources was performed up to November 2021. We included randomized controlled trials comparing CBT-based interventions for perinatal depression with control conditions allowing for the isolation of the effects of CBT.

Results: In total, 31 studies (5291 participants) were included in the systematic review and 26 studies (4658 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size was medium (hedges g = - 0.53 [95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.40]); with high heterogeneity. Significant effects were also found for anxiety, individual stress, and perceived social support, however few studies examined secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis identified type of control, type of CBT, and type of health professional as significant moderators of the main effect (symptoms of depression). Some concerns of risk of bias were present in the majority of studies and one study had a high risk of bias.

Conclusions: CBT-based interventions for depression during the perinatal period appear effective, however results should be interpreted with caution given high levels of heterogeneity and low quality of included studies. There is a need to further investigate possibly important clinical moderators of effect, including the type of health professional delivering interventions. Further, results indicate a need to establish a minimum core data set to improve the consistency of secondary outcome collection across trials and to design and conduct trials with longer-term follow-up periods.

Trial registration: CRD42020152254 .

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于认知行为疗法的产妇围产期抑郁症干预措施的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:围产期(怀孕期间和产后一年)抑郁症很常见,会给母亲、婴儿、家庭成员和社会带来一系列负面影响。尽管现有证据表明基于认知行为疗法(CBT)的干预措施对围产期抑郁症有效,但人们对基于 CBT 的干预措施对重要次要结果的影响知之甚少,而且一些潜在的临床和方法调节因素尚未得到研究:方法:一项系统综述和荟萃分析主要研究了基于 CBT 的围产期抑郁症干预对抑郁症状的有效性。次要目的是研究基于 CBT 的围产期抑郁干预对焦虑、压力、养育子女、感知社会支持和感知父母能力等症状的有效性;并探讨可能与有效性相关的临床和方法调节因素。截至 2021 年 11 月,我们对电子数据库和其他来源进行了系统性检索。我们纳入了将基于 CBT 的围产期抑郁症干预措施与对照条件进行比较的随机对照试验,以便将 CBT 的效果分离出来:共有 31 项研究(5291 名参与者)被纳入系统综述,26 项研究(4658 名参与者)被纳入荟萃分析。总体效应大小为中等(hedges g = - 0.53 [95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.40]);异质性较高。焦虑、个人压力和感知到的社会支持也有显著效果,但很少有研究对次要结果进行研究。亚组分析发现,控制类型、CBT 类型和医疗专业人员类型对主效应(抑郁症状)有显著的调节作用。大多数研究都存在一定的偏倚风险,其中一项研究的偏倚风险较高:基于 CBT 的围产期抑郁症干预似乎很有效,但由于纳入研究的异质性较高且质量较低,因此在解释结果时应谨慎。有必要进一步研究可能影响效果的重要临床调节因素,包括实施干预的医疗专业人员的类型。此外,研究结果表明,有必要建立最低限度的核心数据集,以提高各项试验中次要结果收集的一致性,并设计和开展具有较长随访期的试验:CRD42020152254 .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Transdiagnostic internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depressive symptoms in postnatal women: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Mental health of university students twenty months after the beginning of the full-scale Russian-Ukrainian war. Needs of the network: a qualitative study of the needs of family members, partners and close friends of people with a severe mental illness (SMI). Psychometric testing of Chinese version of screening tools (PASS) and GAD among perinatal population: hospital based evidence 2023. Relevant factors contributing to risk of suicide among adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1