Exergaming in the treatment of gait, balance, and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: Overview of systematic reviews.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1002/pri.2002
Poliany Silva Rocha, Bianca Brenda Leite de Sousa, Marco D'Amelio, José Eduardo Pompeu, Patrícia Azevedo Garcia, Josevan Cerqueira Leal, Felipe Augusto Dos Santos Mendes
{"title":"Exergaming in the treatment of gait, balance, and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: Overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Poliany Silva Rocha,&nbsp;Bianca Brenda Leite de Sousa,&nbsp;Marco D'Amelio,&nbsp;José Eduardo Pompeu,&nbsp;Patrícia Azevedo Garcia,&nbsp;Josevan Cerqueira Leal,&nbsp;Felipe Augusto Dos Santos Mendes","doi":"10.1002/pri.2002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postural instability and gait impairments are common in people with PD, both of which have a negative effect on their quality of life. Systematic reviews have demonstrated benefits of using exergaming in enhancing these outcomes. However, there is no consensus over whether exergaming therapy is better than conventional physical therapy for enhancing gait, balance, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this overview is to systematically synthesize and evaluate the available evidence found in published systematic reviews and meta-analyses, on the effects of exergaming therapy on balance, gait, and quality of life, compared to conventional physical therapy or no intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This overview was reported in accordance with the statement of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was carried out in nine databases. Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardized forms and the search strategy included terms related to intervention, population, and study type. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews/meta-analysis (SRs/Mas) was evaluated using the \"A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2\" (AMSTAR-2). The \"Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation\" (GRADE) was used to assess the quality of the evidence. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the \"Risk Of Bias In Systematic Reviews\" (ROBIS). PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021238131.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>112 SRs/MAs were found and nine of them were selected. Six reviews were rated as very low methodological quality and three reviews as low methodological quality. Five reviews were classified with low risk of bias and four reviews with high risk of bias. Most of the SR/MAs demonstrated significant effects on balance favoring exergaming therapy over conventional therapy, however those studies had been rated as very low quality of evidence. Inconclusive results were found for the quality of life and gait outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exergaming therapy shows promise for the rehabilitation of PD. However, this overview was unable to conclude with certainty that exergaming therapy is superior to conventional physical therapy in improving gait, balance, or quality of life in people with PD. The effectiveness of exergaming therapy in the treatment of people with PD still need to be verified by high-quality studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":" ","pages":"e2002"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Postural instability and gait impairments are common in people with PD, both of which have a negative effect on their quality of life. Systematic reviews have demonstrated benefits of using exergaming in enhancing these outcomes. However, there is no consensus over whether exergaming therapy is better than conventional physical therapy for enhancing gait, balance, and quality of life.

Objectives: The aim of this overview is to systematically synthesize and evaluate the available evidence found in published systematic reviews and meta-analyses, on the effects of exergaming therapy on balance, gait, and quality of life, compared to conventional physical therapy or no intervention.

Methods: This overview was reported in accordance with the statement of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was carried out in nine databases. Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardized forms and the search strategy included terms related to intervention, population, and study type. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews/meta-analysis (SRs/Mas) was evaluated using the "A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2" (AMSTAR-2). The "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) was used to assess the quality of the evidence. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the "Risk Of Bias In Systematic Reviews" (ROBIS). PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021238131.

Results: 112 SRs/MAs were found and nine of them were selected. Six reviews were rated as very low methodological quality and three reviews as low methodological quality. Five reviews were classified with low risk of bias and four reviews with high risk of bias. Most of the SR/MAs demonstrated significant effects on balance favoring exergaming therapy over conventional therapy, however those studies had been rated as very low quality of evidence. Inconclusive results were found for the quality of life and gait outcomes.

Conclusion: Exergaming therapy shows promise for the rehabilitation of PD. However, this overview was unable to conclude with certainty that exergaming therapy is superior to conventional physical therapy in improving gait, balance, or quality of life in people with PD. The effectiveness of exergaming therapy in the treatment of people with PD still need to be verified by high-quality studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动治疗帕金森病的步态、平衡和生活质量:系统综述
姿势不稳定和步态障碍在PD患者中很常见,两者都对他们的生活质量产生负面影响。系统评价已经证明了使用练习在提高这些结果方面的好处。然而,对于运动疗法是否比传统物理疗法更好地改善步态、平衡和生活质量,尚无共识。目的:本综述的目的是系统地综合和评估在已发表的系统综述和荟萃分析中发现的关于运动治疗对平衡、步态和生活质量的影响的现有证据,与传统物理治疗或无干预治疗相比。方法:本综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)的声明进行报道。在9个数据库中进行了全面的检索。两位审稿人使用标准化表格独立提取数据,搜索策略包括与干预、人群和研究类型相关的术语。采用“评估系统评价2的测量工具”(AMSTAR-2)对纳入的系统评价/荟萃分析(SRs/Mas)的方法学质量进行评估。“建议评估、发展和评价分级”(GRADE)用于评估证据的质量。偏倚风险评估采用“系统评价中的偏倚风险”(ROBIS)。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42021238131。结果:共发现ssr /MAs 112例,筛选出9例。6篇综述被评为非常低的方法学质量,3篇综述被评为低方法学质量。5篇综述被分类为低偏倚风险,4篇综述被分类为高偏倚风险。大多数SR/MAs在平衡方面表现出比传统疗法更倾向于运动疗法的显著效果,然而这些研究被评为证据质量非常低。生活质量和步态结果尚无定论。结论:运动疗法对帕金森病的康复有良好的疗效。然而,这一综述并不能确定运动疗法在改善PD患者的步态、平衡或生活质量方面优于传统物理疗法。运动疗法治疗PD患者的有效性仍需要高质量的研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Efficacy of Action Observation Therapy on Gait, Balance and Mobility Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease. Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Individuals Post Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1