Discrimination of Sexual and Gender Minority Patients in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Results from the Restore-1 Study.

IF 2.7 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Stigma and Health Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-20 DOI:10.1037/sah0000356
Michael W Ross, B R Simon Rosser, Elizabeth J Polter, Alex J Bates, Christopher W Wheldon, Ryan Haggart, William West, Nidhi Kohli, Badrinath R Konety, Darryl Mitteldorf, G Kristine M C Talley, Morgan Wright
{"title":"Discrimination of Sexual and Gender Minority Patients in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Results from the <i>Restore-1</i> Study.","authors":"Michael W Ross, B R Simon Rosser, Elizabeth J Polter, Alex J Bates, Christopher W Wheldon, Ryan Haggart, William West, Nidhi Kohli, Badrinath R Konety, Darryl Mitteldorf, G Kristine M C Talley, Morgan Wright","doi":"10.1037/sah0000356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study is the first to quantify experiences of discrimination in treatment undertaken by sexual and gender minority prostate cancer patients. Participants were 192 gay and bisexual and one transgender prostate cancer patients living in the US recruited from North America's largest online cancer support group. In this online survey, discrimination in treatment was measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS), adapted for medical settings. Almost half (46%) endorsed at least one item, including 43% that the provider did not listen, 25% that they were talked down to, 20% that they received poorer care than other patients, 19% that the provider acted as superior, and 10% that the provider appeared afraid of them. While most (26.3%) rated the discrimination as \"rare\" or \"sometimes\" (EDS=1-3), 20% reported it as more common (EDS≥4). Most attributed the discrimination to their sexual orientation, or to providers being arrogant or too pushed for time. Discrimination was significantly associated with poorer urinary, bowel, and hormonal (but not sexual) EPIC function and bother scores, and with poorer mental health (SF-12). Those who had systemic/combined treatment (versus either radiation only or surgery only) were more likely to report discrimination. This study provides the first evidence that discrimination in prostate cancer treatment, including micro-aggressions, appear a common experience for gay and bisexual patients, and may result in poorer health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53222,"journal":{"name":"Stigma and Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stigma and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is the first to quantify experiences of discrimination in treatment undertaken by sexual and gender minority prostate cancer patients. Participants were 192 gay and bisexual and one transgender prostate cancer patients living in the US recruited from North America's largest online cancer support group. In this online survey, discrimination in treatment was measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS), adapted for medical settings. Almost half (46%) endorsed at least one item, including 43% that the provider did not listen, 25% that they were talked down to, 20% that they received poorer care than other patients, 19% that the provider acted as superior, and 10% that the provider appeared afraid of them. While most (26.3%) rated the discrimination as "rare" or "sometimes" (EDS=1-3), 20% reported it as more common (EDS≥4). Most attributed the discrimination to their sexual orientation, or to providers being arrogant or too pushed for time. Discrimination was significantly associated with poorer urinary, bowel, and hormonal (but not sexual) EPIC function and bother scores, and with poorer mental health (SF-12). Those who had systemic/combined treatment (versus either radiation only or surgery only) were more likely to report discrimination. This study provides the first evidence that discrimination in prostate cancer treatment, including micro-aggressions, appear a common experience for gay and bisexual patients, and may result in poorer health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌治疗中对性取向和性别少数群体患者的歧视:Restore-1 研究的结果。
这项研究首次量化了性少数群体和性别少数群体前列腺癌患者在治疗过程中遭受歧视的经历。研究人员从北美最大的在线癌症支持小组中招募了 192 名居住在美国的男同性恋、双性恋和一名变性前列腺癌患者。在这项在线调查中,使用了针对医疗环境改编的 "日常歧视量表"(EDS)来测量治疗中的歧视。近一半的受访者(46%)认可至少一个项目,其中 43% 的受访者认为医疗服务提供者没有倾听他们的意见,25% 的受访者认为医疗服务提供者对他们说三道四,20% 的受访者认为他们得到的医疗服务比其他患者差,19% 的受访者认为医疗服务提供者高高在上,10% 的受访者认为医疗服务提供者似乎害怕他们。虽然大多数人(26.3%)将歧视评为 "罕见 "或 "有时"(EDS=1-3),但有 20% 的人认为歧视更为常见(EDS≥4)。大多数人将歧视归咎于他们的性取向,或服务提供者傲慢或时间太紧。歧视与较差的排尿、排便和荷尔蒙(而非性功能)EPIC 功能和困扰评分以及较差的心理健康(SF-12)有明显关联。接受系统/综合治疗(相对于只接受放射治疗或只接受手术治疗)的患者更有可能报告受到歧视。这项研究首次证明,前列腺癌治疗中的歧视(包括微观歧视)似乎是男同性恋和双性恋患者的共同经历,并可能导致较差的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stigma and Health
Stigma and Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
94
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for How Parents Talk About Weight: Qualitative Content Analysis Using a Randomized Experiment Study Design Supplemental Material for Public Stigma Toward People With Bipolar Versus Borderline: An Experimental Study of Attributions, Treatability, Race, and Gender The causes and consequences of stigma among individuals involved in the criminal legal system: A systematic review. Neighborhood resources, discrimination, and mental health treatment access for youth engaging in self-injury. Asian Americans’ intention to seek help: The mediating influence of self-stigma on the theory of planned behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1