Stay (Close to) Humble: Intellectual Humility Negatively Predicts Stigma Toward and Social Distance from Individuals with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-13 DOI:10.1177/00332941231157233
Randee M Schmitt, Ho Phi Huynh
{"title":"Stay (Close to) Humble: Intellectual Humility Negatively Predicts Stigma Toward and Social Distance from Individuals with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.","authors":"Randee M Schmitt, Ho Phi Huynh","doi":"10.1177/00332941231157233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains a highly stigmatized disorder despite its prevalence. Given that the origin of stigmatization is rooted in cognitive representations that people hold, stigma may be differentially exhibited by people with varying degrees of cognitive flexibility. Intellectual humility, the recognition of one's own intellectual shortcomings or flaws, may allow for flexibility in how people navigate knowledge surrounding PTSD, which may reduce stigma and improve interpersonal interactions with individuals with PTSD. The present study investigated whether intellectual humility would negatively predict PTSD stigma and social distance, above and beyond demographic factors and personal or social experience with individuals with PTSD. Participants (<i>N</i> = 421, 67.2% men, mean age = 37.45, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 9.99) completed a multidimensional measure for intellectual humility and the Mental Illness Stigma Scale adapted to assess PTSD stigma. Results confirmed our preregistered predictions. Bivariate correlations demonstrated that overall intellectual humility was negatively correlated with overall PTSD stigma, and overall intellectual humility was negatively correlated with overall social distance. That is, intellectually humble people reported less PTSD stigma and desired closer social distance with individuals with PTSD. Additionally, hierarchical multiple regression revealed that intellectual humility predicted unique variance in PTSD stigma and social distance above and beyond the contribution of demographic factors and personal experience or social relationships with someone with PTSD. These results may provide a useful framework for approaching and minimizing stigma toward PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"827-851"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231157233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains a highly stigmatized disorder despite its prevalence. Given that the origin of stigmatization is rooted in cognitive representations that people hold, stigma may be differentially exhibited by people with varying degrees of cognitive flexibility. Intellectual humility, the recognition of one's own intellectual shortcomings or flaws, may allow for flexibility in how people navigate knowledge surrounding PTSD, which may reduce stigma and improve interpersonal interactions with individuals with PTSD. The present study investigated whether intellectual humility would negatively predict PTSD stigma and social distance, above and beyond demographic factors and personal or social experience with individuals with PTSD. Participants (N = 421, 67.2% men, mean age = 37.45, SDage = 9.99) completed a multidimensional measure for intellectual humility and the Mental Illness Stigma Scale adapted to assess PTSD stigma. Results confirmed our preregistered predictions. Bivariate correlations demonstrated that overall intellectual humility was negatively correlated with overall PTSD stigma, and overall intellectual humility was negatively correlated with overall social distance. That is, intellectually humble people reported less PTSD stigma and desired closer social distance with individuals with PTSD. Additionally, hierarchical multiple regression revealed that intellectual humility predicted unique variance in PTSD stigma and social distance above and beyond the contribution of demographic factors and personal experience or social relationships with someone with PTSD. These results may provide a useful framework for approaching and minimizing stigma toward PTSD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保持(接近)谦逊:智力上的谦逊会消极地预测对创伤后应激障碍患者的成见和社会距离。
尽管创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)很普遍,但它仍然是一种极易被鄙视的疾病。鉴于鄙视的根源在于人们所持有的认知表征,认知灵活性不同的人可能会表现出不同的鄙视。智力上的谦逊,即承认自己智力上的不足或缺陷,可以使人们灵活地掌握有关创伤后应激障碍的知识,从而减少鄙视并改善与创伤后应激障碍患者的人际交往。本研究调查了智力上的谦逊是否会对创伤后应激障碍的耻辱感和社会距离产生负面影响,而不只是人口统计学因素和与创伤后应激障碍患者的个人或社会经验。参与者(N = 421,67.2% 为男性,平均年龄 = 37.45,SD 年龄 = 9.99)完成了智力谦逊的多维度测量和为评估创伤后应激障碍耻辱感而改编的精神疾病耻辱感量表。结果证实了我们预先登记的预测。双变量相关性表明,总体智力谦逊与总体创伤后应激障碍耻辱感呈负相关,总体智力谦逊与总体社会距离呈负相关。也就是说,智力谦逊的人对创伤后应激障碍的成见较少,并希望与创伤后应激障碍患者保持更近的社会距离。此外,分层多元回归显示,除了人口统计学因素、个人经历或与创伤后应激障碍患者的社会关系的贡献之外,智力谦逊还能预测创伤后应激障碍耻辱感和社会距离的独特差异。这些结果可能为接近和减少创伤后应激障碍的成见提供了一个有用的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
The Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Suicide and Suicidal Ideation and Attempts Among Chinese College Students: The Mediating Role of Depression. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Correlation Coefficients Between Fear of Missing Out and Sleep Health Dimensions. The Self-Compassionate Path to Self-Forgiveness: Self-Kindness Enhances and Isolation Inhibits. Can Peripheral Group Members Not Represent the In-Group? The Effect of Member Prototypicality on Intergroup Conflict. From Tolerance for Ambiguity to Stress and Anxiety: The Mediating Role of Need for Cognitive Closure Among Chinese University Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1