Circulating protein and lipid markers of early sepsis diagnosis and prognosis: a scoping review.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Current opinion in lipidology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1097/MOL.0000000000000870
Gemma Barber, Jelena Tanic, Aleksandra Leligdowicz
{"title":"Circulating protein and lipid markers of early sepsis diagnosis and prognosis: a scoping review.","authors":"Gemma Barber,&nbsp;Jelena Tanic,&nbsp;Aleksandra Leligdowicz","doi":"10.1097/MOL.0000000000000870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Sepsis is the extreme response to infection associated with high mortality, yet reliable biomarkers for its identification and stratification are lacking.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Our scoping review of studies published from January 2017 to September 2022 that investigated circulating protein and lipid markers to inform non-COVID-19 sepsis diagnosis and prognosis identified interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, heparin-binding protein (HBP), and angiopoietin-2 as having the most evidence. Biomarkers can be grouped according to sepsis pathobiology to inform biological data interpretation and four such physiologic processes include: immune regulation, endothelial injury and coagulopathy, cellular injury, and organ injury. Relative to proteins, the pleiotropic effects of lipid species' render their categorization more difficult. Circulating lipids are relatively less well studied in sepsis, however, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is associated with poor outcome.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is a lack of robust, large, and multicenter studies to support the routine use of circulating proteins and lipids for sepsis diagnosis or prognosis. Future studies will benefit from standardizing cohort design as well as analytical and reporting strategies. Incorporating biomarker dynamic changes and clinical data in statistical modeling may improve specificity for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis. To guide future clinical decisions at the bedside, point-of-care circulating biomarker quantification is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11109,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in lipidology","volume":"34 2","pages":"70-81"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in lipidology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Sepsis is the extreme response to infection associated with high mortality, yet reliable biomarkers for its identification and stratification are lacking.

Recent findings: Our scoping review of studies published from January 2017 to September 2022 that investigated circulating protein and lipid markers to inform non-COVID-19 sepsis diagnosis and prognosis identified interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, heparin-binding protein (HBP), and angiopoietin-2 as having the most evidence. Biomarkers can be grouped according to sepsis pathobiology to inform biological data interpretation and four such physiologic processes include: immune regulation, endothelial injury and coagulopathy, cellular injury, and organ injury. Relative to proteins, the pleiotropic effects of lipid species' render their categorization more difficult. Circulating lipids are relatively less well studied in sepsis, however, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is associated with poor outcome.

Summary: There is a lack of robust, large, and multicenter studies to support the routine use of circulating proteins and lipids for sepsis diagnosis or prognosis. Future studies will benefit from standardizing cohort design as well as analytical and reporting strategies. Incorporating biomarker dynamic changes and clinical data in statistical modeling may improve specificity for sepsis diagnosis and prognosis. To guide future clinical decisions at the bedside, point-of-care circulating biomarker quantification is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期脓毒症诊断和预后的循环蛋白和脂质标志物:范围综述。
综述目的:脓毒症是对感染的极端反应,与高死亡率相关,但缺乏可靠的生物标志物来识别和分层。近期发现:我们对2017年1月至2022年9月发表的研究进行了范围回顾,这些研究调查了循环蛋白和脂质标志物,为非covid -19败血症的诊断和预后提供信息,发现白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-8、肝素结合蛋白(HBP)和血管生成素-2的证据最多。生物标志物可以根据败血症的病理生物学进行分组,为生物学数据的解释提供信息,其中四个生理过程包括:免疫调节、内皮损伤和凝血功能障碍、细胞损伤和器官损伤。相对于蛋白质,脂质物种的多效性使得它们的分类更加困难。循环脂质在脓毒症中的研究相对较少,然而,低高密度脂蛋白(HDL)与不良预后相关。总结:目前缺乏强有力的、大型的、多中心的研究来支持循环蛋白和脂质在败血症诊断或预后中的常规应用。未来的研究将受益于标准化的队列设计以及分析和报告策略。将生物标志物动态变化和临床数据纳入统计模型可提高脓毒症诊断和预后的特异性。为了指导未来床边的临床决策,需要对护理点循环生物标志物进行量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current opinion in lipidology
Current opinion in lipidology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Lipidology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from six key disciplines including nutrition and metabolism, genetics and molecular biology, and hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular disease. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by a section of Bimonthly Updates, which deliver an insight into new developments at the cutting edge of the disciplines covered in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Are the lipid-lowering effects of incretin-based therapies relevant for cardiovascular benefit? From clinical development to real-world outcomes with inclisiran. Oral agents for lowering lipoprotein(a). Universal screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia: how can we maximise benefits and minimise potential harm for children and their families? A contemporary snapshot of familial hypercholesterolemia registries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1