Hepatitis B immune status of staff in smaller acute healthcare facilities.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian Health Review Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1071/AH22219
Alex Hoskins, Leon James Worth, Michael James Malloy, Katherine Walker, Ann Bull, Noleen Bennett
{"title":"Hepatitis B immune status of staff in smaller acute healthcare facilities.","authors":"Alex Hoskins,&nbsp;Leon James Worth,&nbsp;Michael James Malloy,&nbsp;Katherine Walker,&nbsp;Ann Bull,&nbsp;Noleen Bennett","doi":"10.1071/AH22219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To determine the proportion of staff employed in smaller Victorian public acute healthcare facilities with evidence of immunity to hepatitis B. Methods For optimal long-term immunity, a completed hepatitis B vaccination course and post vaccination hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) level ≥10 mIU/mL is desirable for all high-risk staff employed in healthcare facilities. For the financial years 2016/17-2019/20, a standardised surveillance module developed by the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) Coordinating Centre was completed by the smaller Victorian public acute healthcare facilities (individual hospitals with Results A total of 88 healthcare facilities reported hepatitis B immunity status of high-risk (Category A) staff (n  = 29 920) at least once over 5 years; 55 healthcare facilities reported more than once. The aggregate proportion with evidence of optimal immunity was 66.3%. Healthcare facilities with 100-199 Category A staff employed reported the lowest evidence of optimal immunity (59.6%). Of all Category A staff with no evidence of optimal immunity, the majority had 'unknown' status (19.8%), with only 0.6% overall who declined vaccination. Conclusions Our study found evidence of optimal staff hepatitis B immunity in only two-thirds of Category A staff working in surveyed healthcare facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":"47 2","pages":"254-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To determine the proportion of staff employed in smaller Victorian public acute healthcare facilities with evidence of immunity to hepatitis B. Methods For optimal long-term immunity, a completed hepatitis B vaccination course and post vaccination hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) level ≥10 mIU/mL is desirable for all high-risk staff employed in healthcare facilities. For the financial years 2016/17-2019/20, a standardised surveillance module developed by the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System (VICNISS) Coordinating Centre was completed by the smaller Victorian public acute healthcare facilities (individual hospitals with Results A total of 88 healthcare facilities reported hepatitis B immunity status of high-risk (Category A) staff (n  = 29 920) at least once over 5 years; 55 healthcare facilities reported more than once. The aggregate proportion with evidence of optimal immunity was 66.3%. Healthcare facilities with 100-199 Category A staff employed reported the lowest evidence of optimal immunity (59.6%). Of all Category A staff with no evidence of optimal immunity, the majority had 'unknown' status (19.8%), with only 0.6% overall who declined vaccination. Conclusions Our study found evidence of optimal staff hepatitis B immunity in only two-thirds of Category A staff working in surveyed healthcare facilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小型急症医疗机构工作人员乙型肝炎免疫状况。
目的确定维多利亚州小型公共急性卫生保健机构工作人员中具有乙型肝炎免疫证据的比例。方法为获得最佳的长期免疫,所有在卫生保健机构工作的高危人员最好完成乙型肝炎疫苗接种过程,接种后乙型肝炎表面抗体(anti-HBs)水平≥10 mIU/mL。在2016/17-2019/20财政年度,由维多利亚州医疗保健相关感染监测系统(VICNISS)协调中心开发的标准化监测模块由维多利亚州较小的公共急性医疗保健机构完成(个别医院的结果是,共有88家医疗保健机构报告了高风险(a类)工作人员(n = 29920)在5年内至少一次的乙型肝炎免疫状况;55家医疗机构不止一次报告。具有最佳免疫证据的总比例为66.3%。雇用100-199名A类工作人员的医疗机构报告的最佳免疫力证据最低(59.6%)。在所有没有最佳免疫证据的A类工作人员中,大多数处于“未知”状态(19.8%),总体上只有0.6%的人拒绝接种疫苗。我们的研究发现,在接受调查的医疗机构中,只有三分之二的A类工作人员具有最佳的工作人员乙型肝炎免疫力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of physiotherapy-led lung ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Clinical governance implications of a Victorian coronial finding regarding contrast-related anaphylaxis for health services and private providers of radiology services. Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care. Establishment of the first Australian public and health-professional palliative care advice service: exploring caller needs and gaps in care. Evaluating an implementation of the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1