Psychometric properties of a French version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Medical Education Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.5116/ijme.62d2.8497
Mariem Ghardallou, Chekib Zedini, Jihene Sahli, Thouraya Ajmi, Hedi Khairi, Ali Mtiraoui
{"title":"Psychometric properties of a French version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.","authors":"Mariem Ghardallou,&nbsp;Chekib Zedini,&nbsp;Jihene Sahli,&nbsp;Thouraya Ajmi,&nbsp;Hedi Khairi,&nbsp;Ali Mtiraoui","doi":"10.5116/ijme.62d2.8497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the reliability and construct validity of a French version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed among undergraduate medical students in Tunisia. A total of 833 students completed a French version of the JSE-S using convenience sampling. To identify the internal consistency aspect of the reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was computed. Moreover, to assess the construct validity, the sample was randomly divided into two groups. Data from the first group (n=415) were subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA), with principal axing factoring (PAF) and oblimin rotation, to re-examine the underlying factor structure of the scale. Data from the second group (n=419) were used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm its latent variable structure. Some goodness-of-fit indices were used to assess the hypothesized model. Gender groups were compared using a t-test to check the known-group validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability analysis reported an acceptable level of internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 (95% CI [0.75,0.80]). EFA identified a two-factor structure, accounting for 27.4% of the total variance. The two-factor model produced good fit indices when item correlated errors were considered (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.95, GFI = 0.92, CFI = 0.90, PCFI = 0.79, PGFI = 0.73 and RMSEA = 0.04). Female students had a statistically significant higher empathy scores than male students (t <sub>(830)</sub> = - 4.16, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings support the construct validity and reliability of a French version of the JSE for medical students. This instrument appears to be useful for investigating empathy among French-speaking populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.62d2.8497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the reliability and construct validity of a French version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Students.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among undergraduate medical students in Tunisia. A total of 833 students completed a French version of the JSE-S using convenience sampling. To identify the internal consistency aspect of the reliability, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was computed. Moreover, to assess the construct validity, the sample was randomly divided into two groups. Data from the first group (n=415) were subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA), with principal axing factoring (PAF) and oblimin rotation, to re-examine the underlying factor structure of the scale. Data from the second group (n=419) were used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm its latent variable structure. Some goodness-of-fit indices were used to assess the hypothesized model. Gender groups were compared using a t-test to check the known-group validity.

Results: Reliability analysis reported an acceptable level of internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 (95% CI [0.75,0.80]). EFA identified a two-factor structure, accounting for 27.4% of the total variance. The two-factor model produced good fit indices when item correlated errors were considered (χ2/df = 1.95, GFI = 0.92, CFI = 0.90, PCFI = 0.79, PGFI = 0.73 and RMSEA = 0.04). Female students had a statistically significant higher empathy scores than male students (t (830) = - 4.16, p < .001).

Conclusions: The findings support the construct validity and reliability of a French version of the JSE for medical students. This instrument appears to be useful for investigating empathy among French-speaking populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法语版杰弗逊共情量表的心理测量特性。
目的:评价法语版杰弗逊共情学生量表的信度和结构效度。方法:对突尼斯医科本科学生进行横断面调查。共有833名学生使用方便抽样的方法完成了法语版的JSE-S。为了确定信度的内部一致性方面,计算了Cronbach's alpha系数。此外,为了评估构念效度,样本被随机分为两组。第一组(n=415)的数据进行探索性因子分析(EFA),采用委托保理(PAF)和oblimin轮换,重新检查量表的潜在因子结构。第二组数据(n=419)用于验证性因子分析(CFA)以确定其潜在变量结构。一些拟合优度指标被用来评估假设模型。性别组间比较采用t检验检验已知组效度。结果:信度分析报告了可接受的内部一致性水平,总体Cronbach's α为0.78 (95% CI[0.75,0.80])。EFA确定了一个双因素结构,占总方差的27.4%。考虑项目相关误差后,双因素模型拟合指标较好(χ2/df = 1.95, GFI = 0.92, CFI = 0.90, PCFI = 0.79, PGFI = 0.73, RMSEA = 0.04)。女生的共情得分显著高于男生(t (830) = - 4.16, p < .001)。结论:本研究结果支持法语版医学生自我评价量表的结构效度和信度。这个工具似乎对调查法语人群的同理心很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Exploring a metacognitive approach for case analysis based learning of anxiety adjustment in nurses: a qualitative study. Current trends and obstacles in off-the-job nursing ethics training in Japanese hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Ensuring fairness in assessment in health professions education: rapid analysis tools to detect differential item functioning across groups. Factors influencing intercultural competences of hospital workers for multicultural patients in South Korea. Workforce nurturing: an approach to improving wellbeing, burnout and professional fulfilment among Australian doctors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1