Relationships Between High-Resolution Computed Tomographic Features and Lung Function Trajectory in Patients With Asthma.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.4168/aair.2023.15.2.174
Joo-Hee Kim, Kyung Eun Shin, Hun Soo Chang, Jong-Uk Lee, Seung-Lee Park, Jai Soung Park, Jong Sook Park, Choon-Sik Park
{"title":"Relationships Between High-Resolution Computed Tomographic Features and Lung Function Trajectory in Patients With Asthma.","authors":"Joo-Hee Kim,&nbsp;Kyung Eun Shin,&nbsp;Hun Soo Chang,&nbsp;Jong-Uk Lee,&nbsp;Seung-Lee Park,&nbsp;Jai Soung Park,&nbsp;Jong Sook Park,&nbsp;Choon-Sik Park","doi":"10.4168/aair.2023.15.2.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A subset of asthmatics suffers from persistent airflow limitation, known as remodeled asthma, despite optimal treatment. Typical quantitative scoring methods to evaluate structural changes of airway remodeling on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) are time-consuming and laborious. Thus, easier and simpler methods are required in clinical practice. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of a simple, semi-quantitative method based on 8 HRCT parameters by comparing asthmatics with a persistent decline of post-bronchodilator (BD)-FEV1 to those with a BD-FEV1 that normalized over time and evaluated the relationships of the parameters with BD-FEV1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Asthmatics (n = 59) were grouped into 5 trajectories (Trs) according to the changes of BD-FEV1 over 1 year. After 9-12 months of guideline-based treatment, HRCT parameters including emphysema, bronchiectasis, anthracofibrosis, bronchial wall thickening (BWT), fibrotic bands, mosaic attenuation on inspiration, air-trapping on expiration, and centrilobular nodules were classified as present (1) or absent (0) in 6 zones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Tr5 group (n = 11) was older and exhibited a persistent decline in BD-FEV1. The Tr5 and Tr4 groups (n = 12), who had a lower baseline BD-FEV1 that normalized over time, had longer durations of asthma, frequent exacerbations, and higher doses of steroid use compared to the Tr1-3 groups (n = 36), who had a normal baseline BD-FEV1. The Tr5 group had higher emphysema and BWT scores than the Tr4 (<i>P</i> = 8.25E-04 and <i>P</i> = 0.044, respectively). Scores for the other 6 parameters were not significantly different among the Tr groups. BD-FEV1 was inversely correlated with the emphysema and BWT scores in multivariate analysis (<i>P</i> = 1.70E-04, <i>P</i> = 0.006, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emphysema and BWT are associated with airway remodeling in asthmatics. Our simple, semi-quantitative scoring system based on HRCT may be an easy-to-use method for estimating airflow limitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7547,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","volume":"15 2","pages":"174-185"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3a/18/aair-15-174.PMC10079522.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2023.15.2.174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: A subset of asthmatics suffers from persistent airflow limitation, known as remodeled asthma, despite optimal treatment. Typical quantitative scoring methods to evaluate structural changes of airway remodeling on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) are time-consuming and laborious. Thus, easier and simpler methods are required in clinical practice. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of a simple, semi-quantitative method based on 8 HRCT parameters by comparing asthmatics with a persistent decline of post-bronchodilator (BD)-FEV1 to those with a BD-FEV1 that normalized over time and evaluated the relationships of the parameters with BD-FEV1.

Methods: Asthmatics (n = 59) were grouped into 5 trajectories (Trs) according to the changes of BD-FEV1 over 1 year. After 9-12 months of guideline-based treatment, HRCT parameters including emphysema, bronchiectasis, anthracofibrosis, bronchial wall thickening (BWT), fibrotic bands, mosaic attenuation on inspiration, air-trapping on expiration, and centrilobular nodules were classified as present (1) or absent (0) in 6 zones.

Results: The Tr5 group (n = 11) was older and exhibited a persistent decline in BD-FEV1. The Tr5 and Tr4 groups (n = 12), who had a lower baseline BD-FEV1 that normalized over time, had longer durations of asthma, frequent exacerbations, and higher doses of steroid use compared to the Tr1-3 groups (n = 36), who had a normal baseline BD-FEV1. The Tr5 group had higher emphysema and BWT scores than the Tr4 (P = 8.25E-04 and P = 0.044, respectively). Scores for the other 6 parameters were not significantly different among the Tr groups. BD-FEV1 was inversely correlated with the emphysema and BWT scores in multivariate analysis (P = 1.70E-04, P = 0.006, respectively).

Conclusions: Emphysema and BWT are associated with airway remodeling in asthmatics. Our simple, semi-quantitative scoring system based on HRCT may be an easy-to-use method for estimating airflow limitation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哮喘患者高分辨率计算机断层特征与肺功能轨迹的关系。
目的:哮喘患者的一个子集遭受持续气流限制,被称为重塑哮喘,尽管最佳治疗。在高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)上评估气道重构结构变化的典型定量评分方法耗时且费力。因此,在临床实践中需要更容易、更简单的方法。我们通过比较支气管扩张剂后(BD) fev1持续下降的哮喘患者和BD-FEV1随时间正常化的哮喘患者,评估了一种简单的、基于8个HRCT参数的半定量方法的临床实用性,并评估了这些参数与BD-FEV1的关系。方法:59例哮喘患者按1年内BD-FEV1变化分为5个轨迹(Trs)。经过9-12个月的指导治疗,HRCT参数包括肺气肿、支气管扩张、炭疽纤维化、支气管壁增厚(BWT)、纤维化带、吸气时的mosaic衰减、呼气时的空气困住和小叶中心结节在6个区域被划分为存在(1)或不存在(0)。结果:Tr5组(n = 11)年龄较大,BD-FEV1持续下降。与基线BD-FEV1正常的Tr1-3组(n = 36)相比,基线BD-FEV1较低且随时间正常化的Tr5和Tr4组(n = 12)哮喘持续时间较长,发作频繁,类固醇使用剂量较高。Tr5组肺气肿和BWT评分高于Tr4组(P = 8.25E-04和P = 0.044)。其他6项指标的评分在Tr组间无显著差异。多因素分析中,BD-FEV1与肺气肿、BWT评分呈负相关(P = 1.70E-04, P = 0.006)。结论:哮喘患者的气道重塑与肺气肿和BWT有关。我们基于HRCT的简单半定量评分系统可能是一种易于使用的评估气流限制的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal features cutting-edge original research, brief communications, and state-of-the-art reviews in the specialties of allergy, asthma, and immunology, including clinical and experimental studies and instructive case reports. Contemporary reviews summarize information on topics for researchers and physicians in the fields of allergy and immunology. As of January 2017, AAIR do not accept case reports. However, if it is a clinically important case, authors can submit it in the form of letter to the Editor. Editorials and letters to the Editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion among physicians dealing with allergy, immunology, pediatric respirology, and related medical fields. AAIR also features topics in practice and management and recent advances in equipment and techniques for clinicians concerned with clinical manifestations of allergies and pediatric respiratory diseases.
期刊最新文献
Involvement of the Constitutive Photomorphogenesis 9 Signalosome Subunit 5 With Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Ligand in Asthma. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps as a Biomarker in Refractory Non-Type 2 CRSwNP. Oral Administration of Lactococcus lactis Expressing Mite and Cockroach Major Allergens Alleviates Progression of Atopic March in a Mouse Model. Skin Lipid Barrier: Structure, Function and Metabolism. Treatment With Upadacitinib in Refractory Prurigo Nodularis: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1