Early Neuroprognostication Using Frontal Spectrograms in Moderately Sedated Cardiac Arrest Patients.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical EEG and Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/15500594221074888
Jae Hoon Lee
{"title":"Early Neuroprognostication Using Frontal Spectrograms in Moderately Sedated Cardiac Arrest Patients.","authors":"Jae Hoon Lee","doi":"10.1177/15500594221074888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i> The integrated suppression ratio throughout all electroencephalography (EEG) patterns has rarely been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of the suppression ratio and hyperactivity of EEG on spectrograms. <i>Methods.</i> This prospective observational study included 73 cardiac arrest patients. Hardwired frontal EEG monitoring with spectrograms (color density spectral arrays, CDSA) was used to predict neurological outcomes. The mean suppression ratio (MSR) and hyperactivity in the high-frequency band (HHF) in the spectrogram were investigated in moderately sedated patients. Sedative doses were considered to estimate the MSR, which was automatically measured. <i>Results.</i> Using propofol 30 to 40 µg/kg/min and remifentanil 0.1 to 0.15 µg/kg/min, all the patients with an MSR >30% died. At day 2, the MSR in patients with a good outcome was 0%. The cut off values were different as an MSR >30% at day 1 (AUC 0.815) and an MSR >1% at day 2 (AUC 0.891). Of the patients with an MSR ≤30%, HHF was the greatest predictor of a poor outcome (OR 12.858, <i>P</i> = .006). The best predictors of a poor outcome using the spectrogram were suppression ratio (SR) >30% or HHF at day 1 (AUC 0.88) and SR >1% or HHF at day 2 (AUC 0.909). <i>Conclusions.</i> The use of MSR and HHF in frontal spectrograms is convenient and may be successfully employed for early neuroprognostication in moderately sedated cardiac arrest patients. However, spectrograms should be used with electroencephalogram considering the effects of sedatives because of the imperfect detection of electrographic seizures and artifacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10682,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","volume":"54 3","pages":"281-288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594221074888","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The integrated suppression ratio throughout all electroencephalography (EEG) patterns has rarely been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of the suppression ratio and hyperactivity of EEG on spectrograms. Methods. This prospective observational study included 73 cardiac arrest patients. Hardwired frontal EEG monitoring with spectrograms (color density spectral arrays, CDSA) was used to predict neurological outcomes. The mean suppression ratio (MSR) and hyperactivity in the high-frequency band (HHF) in the spectrogram were investigated in moderately sedated patients. Sedative doses were considered to estimate the MSR, which was automatically measured. Results. Using propofol 30 to 40 µg/kg/min and remifentanil 0.1 to 0.15 µg/kg/min, all the patients with an MSR >30% died. At day 2, the MSR in patients with a good outcome was 0%. The cut off values were different as an MSR >30% at day 1 (AUC 0.815) and an MSR >1% at day 2 (AUC 0.891). Of the patients with an MSR ≤30%, HHF was the greatest predictor of a poor outcome (OR 12.858, P = .006). The best predictors of a poor outcome using the spectrogram were suppression ratio (SR) >30% or HHF at day 1 (AUC 0.88) and SR >1% or HHF at day 2 (AUC 0.909). Conclusions. The use of MSR and HHF in frontal spectrograms is convenient and may be successfully employed for early neuroprognostication in moderately sedated cardiac arrest patients. However, spectrograms should be used with electroencephalogram considering the effects of sedatives because of the imperfect detection of electrographic seizures and artifacts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中度镇静心脏骤停患者额叶谱的早期神经预后。
介绍。所有脑电图(EEG)模式的综合抑制比很少被研究。本研究的目的是评估脑电图频谱抑制比和多动的临床应用。方法。这项前瞻性观察性研究包括73例心脏骤停患者。硬连线额叶脑电图监测与频谱图(彩色密度谱阵列,CDSA)用于预测神经预后。研究了中度镇静患者的平均抑制比(MSR)和频谱图中高频带(HHF)的高活动性。使用镇静剂剂量来估计MSR, MSR是自动测量的。结果。使用异丙酚30 ~ 40µg/kg/min,瑞芬太尼0.1 ~ 0.15µg/kg/min, MSR >30%的患者全部死亡。在第2天,预后良好的患者的MSR为0%。切断值不同,第1天的MSR >30% (AUC 0.815),第2天的MSR >1% (AUC 0.891)。在MSR≤30%的患者中,HHF是预后不良的最大预测因子(OR 12.858, P = 0.006)。使用谱图预测不良预后的最佳指标是第1天抑制比(SR) >30%或HHF (AUC 0.88)和第2天抑制比(SR) >1%或HHF (AUC 0.909)。结论。在额叶谱图中使用MSR和HHF是方便的,可以成功地用于中度镇静的心脏骤停患者的早期神经预后。然而,考虑到镇静剂的影响,频谱图应该与脑电图一起使用,因为电图癫痫发作和伪影的检测不完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical EEG and Neuroscience conveys clinically relevant research and development in electroencephalography and neuroscience. Original articles on any aspect of clinical neurophysiology or related work in allied fields are invited for publication.
期刊最新文献
Ikelos-RWA. Validation of an Automatic Tool to Quantify REM Sleep Without Atonia. Age-dependent Electroencephalogram Characteristics During Different Levels of Anesthetic Depth. The Clinical Utility of Finding Unexpected Subclinical Spikes Detected by High-Density EEG During Neurodiagnostic Investigations Comparative Analysis of LORETA Z Score Neurofeedback and Cognitive Rehabilitation on Quality of Life and Response Inhibition in Individuals with Opioid Addiction Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Can Differentiate Treatment-Resistant and Responsive Depression Cases with High Accuracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1