Black Moms Matter: A Qualitative Approach to Understanding Barriers to Service Utilization at a Children's Advocacy Center Following Childhood Abuse.

IF 4.5 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Maltreatment Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-12 DOI:10.1177/10775595231169782
Isha W Metzger, Angela Moreland, Rachael J Garrett, Kathryn Reid-Quiñones, Briana N Spivey, Jahi Hamilton, Cristina López
{"title":"Black Moms Matter: A Qualitative Approach to Understanding Barriers to Service Utilization at a Children's Advocacy Center Following Childhood Abuse.","authors":"Isha W Metzger, Angela Moreland, Rachael J Garrett, Kathryn Reid-Quiñones, Briana N Spivey, Jahi Hamilton, Cristina López","doi":"10.1177/10775595231169782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black families are significantly less likely to receive evidence-based trauma treatment services; however, little is known about factors impacting engagement, particularly at Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs). The goal of this study is to better understand barriers and facilitators of service utilization for Black caregivers of CAC referred youth. Participants (<i>n</i> = 15) were randomly selected Black maternal caregivers (ages 26-42) recruited from a pool of individuals who were referred to receive CAC services. Black maternal caregivers reported barriers to accessing services at CACs including a lack of assistance and information in the referral and onboarding process, transportation issues, childcare, employment hours, system mistrust, stigma associated with the service system, and outside stressors such as stressors related to parenting. Maternal caregivers also shared suggestions for improving services at CACs including increasing the length, breadth, and clarity of investigations conducted by child protection services and law enforcement (LE) agencies, providing case management services, and having more diverse staff and discussing racial stressors. We conclude by identifying specific barriers to the initiation and engagement in services for Black families, and we provide suggestions for CACs seeking to improve engagement of Black families referred for trauma-related mental health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48052,"journal":{"name":"Child Maltreatment","volume":" ","pages":"648-660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Maltreatment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595231169782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Black families are significantly less likely to receive evidence-based trauma treatment services; however, little is known about factors impacting engagement, particularly at Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs). The goal of this study is to better understand barriers and facilitators of service utilization for Black caregivers of CAC referred youth. Participants (n = 15) were randomly selected Black maternal caregivers (ages 26-42) recruited from a pool of individuals who were referred to receive CAC services. Black maternal caregivers reported barriers to accessing services at CACs including a lack of assistance and information in the referral and onboarding process, transportation issues, childcare, employment hours, system mistrust, stigma associated with the service system, and outside stressors such as stressors related to parenting. Maternal caregivers also shared suggestions for improving services at CACs including increasing the length, breadth, and clarity of investigations conducted by child protection services and law enforcement (LE) agencies, providing case management services, and having more diverse staff and discussing racial stressors. We conclude by identifying specific barriers to the initiation and engagement in services for Black families, and we provide suggestions for CACs seeking to improve engagement of Black families referred for trauma-related mental health services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人妈妈很重要:了解儿童虐待后儿童倡导中心服务利用障碍的定性方法。
黑人家庭获得循证创伤治疗服务的可能性明显降低;然而,人们对影响参与度的因素知之甚少,尤其是在儿童倡导中心。这项研究的目的是更好地了解CAC转介青年黑人护理人员利用服务的障碍和促进因素。参与者(n=15)是从被转介接受CAC服务的人群中随机选择的黑人产妇护理人员(年龄26-42岁)。黑人孕产妇护理人员报告称,在获得CAC服务方面存在障碍,包括在转介和入职过程中缺乏援助和信息、交通问题、儿童保育、就业时间、系统不信任、与服务系统相关的污名以及外部压力源,如与养育子女相关的压力源。产妇护理人员还分享了改善CAC服务的建议,包括增加儿童保护服务和执法机构进行调查的长度、广度和清晰度,提供案件管理服务,配备更多样化的工作人员,并讨论种族压力源。最后,我们确定了为黑人家庭提供服务的具体障碍,并为寻求改善黑人家庭参与创伤相关心理健康服务的CAC提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Maltreatment
Child Maltreatment Multiple-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.80%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Child Maltreatment is the official journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC), the nation"s largest interdisciplinary child maltreatment professional organization. Child Maltreatment"s object is to foster professional excellence in the field of child abuse and neglect by reporting current and at-issue scientific information and technical innovations in a form immediately useful to practitioners and researchers from mental health, child protection, law, law enforcement, medicine, nursing, and allied disciplines. Child Maltreatment emphasizes perspectives with a rigorous scientific base that are relevant to policy, practice, and research.
期刊最新文献
Child Fatalities Resulting From Caregiver Behavior: A Public Health Approach to Child Maltreatment Classification. Child Protection Responses to Domestic Violence Exposure: Co-Occurring Safety Concerns and Investigation Outcomes. Dimensions of Child Maltreatment in Australians With a History of Out-of-Home Care. Birth Spacing and Child Maltreatment: Population-Level Estimates for North Carolina. Interventions to Support Children's Recovery From Neglect-A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1