Extracorporeal blood purification strategies in sepsis and septic shock: An insight into recent advancements.

Yatin Mehta, Rajib Paul, Abdul Samad Ansari, Tanmay Banerjee, Serdar Gunaydin, Amir Ahmad Nassiri, Federico Pappalardo, Vedran Premužić, Prachee Sathe, Vinod Singh, Emilio Rey Vela
{"title":"Extracorporeal blood purification strategies in sepsis and septic shock: An insight into recent advancements.","authors":"Yatin Mehta,&nbsp;Rajib Paul,&nbsp;Abdul Samad Ansari,&nbsp;Tanmay Banerjee,&nbsp;Serdar Gunaydin,&nbsp;Amir Ahmad Nassiri,&nbsp;Federico Pappalardo,&nbsp;Vedran Premužić,&nbsp;Prachee Sathe,&nbsp;Vinod Singh,&nbsp;Emilio Rey Vela","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v12.i2.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite various therapies to treat sepsis, it is one of the leading causes of mortality in the intensive care unit patients globally. Knowledge about the pathophysiology of sepsis has sparked interest in extracorporeal therapies (ECT) which are intended to balance the dysregulation of the immune system by removing excessive levels of inflammatory mediators.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review recent data on the use of ECT in sepsis and to assess their effects on various inflammatory and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this review, an extensive English literature search was conducted from the last two decades to identify the use of ECT in sepsis. A total of 68 articles from peer-reviewed and indexed journals were selected excluding publications with only abstracts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that ECT techniques such as high-volume hemofiltration, coupled plasma adsorption/filtration, resin or polymer adsorbers, and CytoSorb<sup>®</sup> are emerging as adjunct therapies to improve hemodynamic stability in sepsis. CytoSorb<sup>®</sup> has the most published data in regard to the use in the field of septic shock with reports on improved survival rates and lowered sequential organ failure assessment scores, lactate levels, total leucocyte count, platelet count, interleukin- IL-6, IL-10, and TNF levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical acceptance of ECT in sepsis and septic shock is currently still limited due to a lack of large random clinical trials. In addition to patient-tailored therapies, future research developments with therapies targeting the cellular level of the immune response are expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/c5/WJCCM-12-71.PMC10075046.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v12.i2.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Despite various therapies to treat sepsis, it is one of the leading causes of mortality in the intensive care unit patients globally. Knowledge about the pathophysiology of sepsis has sparked interest in extracorporeal therapies (ECT) which are intended to balance the dysregulation of the immune system by removing excessive levels of inflammatory mediators.

Aim: To review recent data on the use of ECT in sepsis and to assess their effects on various inflammatory and clinical outcomes.

Methods: In this review, an extensive English literature search was conducted from the last two decades to identify the use of ECT in sepsis. A total of 68 articles from peer-reviewed and indexed journals were selected excluding publications with only abstracts.

Results: Results showed that ECT techniques such as high-volume hemofiltration, coupled plasma adsorption/filtration, resin or polymer adsorbers, and CytoSorb® are emerging as adjunct therapies to improve hemodynamic stability in sepsis. CytoSorb® has the most published data in regard to the use in the field of septic shock with reports on improved survival rates and lowered sequential organ failure assessment scores, lactate levels, total leucocyte count, platelet count, interleukin- IL-6, IL-10, and TNF levels.

Conclusion: Clinical acceptance of ECT in sepsis and septic shock is currently still limited due to a lack of large random clinical trials. In addition to patient-tailored therapies, future research developments with therapies targeting the cellular level of the immune response are expected.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脓毒症和感染性休克的体外血液净化策略:对最近进展的洞察。
背景:尽管有多种治疗败血症的方法,但它是全球重症监护病房患者死亡的主要原因之一。对脓毒症病理生理学的了解激发了人们对体外疗法(ECT)的兴趣,这种疗法旨在通过去除过量的炎症介质来平衡免疫系统的失调。目的:回顾电痉挛治疗败血症的最新数据,并评估其对各种炎症和临床结果的影响。方法:在本综述中,广泛的英文文献检索进行了从过去二十年来确定使用电痉挛治疗败血症。共选择了同行评审和索引期刊的68篇文章,不包括只有摘要的出版物。结果:结果显示ECT技术,如大容量血液过滤、耦合血浆吸附/过滤、树脂或聚合物吸附剂和CytoSorb®正在成为改善脓毒症血液动力学稳定性的辅助疗法。CytoSorb®在脓毒性休克领域的使用方面发表的数据最多,有提高生存率和降低顺序器官衰竭评估评分、乳酸水平、总白细胞计数、血小板计数、白细胞介素- IL-6、IL-10和TNF水平的报告。结论:由于缺乏大规模随机临床试验,目前临床对ECT治疗脓毒症和感染性休克的接受程度仍然有限。除了针对患者的治疗外,未来的研究还将针对免疫反应的细胞水平进行开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial and synergistic effects of lemongrass and geranium essential oils against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp. Driving pressure: A useful tool for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. Early clinical outcomes of two regimens of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgical patients with delayed sternal closure. Impact of different intravenous bolus rates on fluid and electrolyte balance and mortality in critically ill patients. Low T3 vs low T3T4 euthyroid sick syndrome in septic shock patients: A prospective observational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1