Inflammation-based scores as predictors of treatment response in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrine-related cancer Pub Date : 2023-03-15 Print Date: 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1530/ERC-22-0372
Alessandra Mangone, Barbara Altieri, Mario Detomas, Alessandro Prete, Haider Abbas, Miriam Asia, Yasir S Elhassan, Giovanna Mantovani, Cristina L Ronchi
{"title":"Inflammation-based scores as predictors of treatment response in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.","authors":"Alessandra Mangone,&nbsp;Barbara Altieri,&nbsp;Mario Detomas,&nbsp;Alessandro Prete,&nbsp;Haider Abbas,&nbsp;Miriam Asia,&nbsp;Yasir S Elhassan,&nbsp;Giovanna Mantovani,&nbsp;Cristina L Ronchi","doi":"10.1530/ERC-22-0372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) consists of mitotane alone or combined with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (EDP). Although both therapies are widely used, markers of response are still lacking. Since inflammation-based scores have been proposed as prognostic factors in ACC, we aimed to investigate their role in predicting the response to first-line chemotherapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced ACC treated with mitotane monotherapy or EDP ± mitotane. Clinical parameters (tumour stage at diagnosis, resection status, Ki67, time from diagnosis to treatment start, performance status, plasma mitotane levels, time in mitotane target ≥ 80%, clinically overt cortisol hypersecretion), and pretreatment inflammation-based scores (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) were investigated. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time-to-progression (TTP) from treatment initiation, the secondary endpoint was the best objective response to treatment. We included 90 patients (59% = women, median age = 51 years) treated with mitotane monotherapy (n = 40) or EDP ± mitotane (n = 50). In the mitotane monotherapy cohort, NLR ≥ 5 and PLR ≥ 190 predicted shorter OS (hazard ratio (HR): 145.83, 95% CI: 1.87-11,323.83; HR: 165.50, 95% CI: 1.76-15,538.04, respectively), remaining significant at multivariable analysis including clinical variables. NLR was also associated with shorter TTP (HR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.28-5.20), but only at univariable analysis. Patients with NLR ≥ 5 showed a worse treatment response than those with NLR < 5 (P = 0.040). In the EDP ± mitotane cohort, NLR ≥ 5 predicted shorter OS (HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.30-4.88) and TTP (HR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.04-3.66) at univariable analysis. In conclusion, inflammation-based scores, calculated from routinely measured parameters, may help predict response to chemotherapy in advanced ACC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11654,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine-related cancer","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10083578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine-related cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-22-0372","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) consists of mitotane alone or combined with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (EDP). Although both therapies are widely used, markers of response are still lacking. Since inflammation-based scores have been proposed as prognostic factors in ACC, we aimed to investigate their role in predicting the response to first-line chemotherapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced ACC treated with mitotane monotherapy or EDP ± mitotane. Clinical parameters (tumour stage at diagnosis, resection status, Ki67, time from diagnosis to treatment start, performance status, plasma mitotane levels, time in mitotane target ≥ 80%, clinically overt cortisol hypersecretion), and pretreatment inflammation-based scores (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) were investigated. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time-to-progression (TTP) from treatment initiation, the secondary endpoint was the best objective response to treatment. We included 90 patients (59% = women, median age = 51 years) treated with mitotane monotherapy (n = 40) or EDP ± mitotane (n = 50). In the mitotane monotherapy cohort, NLR ≥ 5 and PLR ≥ 190 predicted shorter OS (hazard ratio (HR): 145.83, 95% CI: 1.87-11,323.83; HR: 165.50, 95% CI: 1.76-15,538.04, respectively), remaining significant at multivariable analysis including clinical variables. NLR was also associated with shorter TTP (HR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.28-5.20), but only at univariable analysis. Patients with NLR ≥ 5 showed a worse treatment response than those with NLR < 5 (P = 0.040). In the EDP ± mitotane cohort, NLR ≥ 5 predicted shorter OS (HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.30-4.88) and TTP (HR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.04-3.66) at univariable analysis. In conclusion, inflammation-based scores, calculated from routinely measured parameters, may help predict response to chemotherapy in advanced ACC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以炎症为基础的评分作为晚期肾上腺皮质癌治疗反应的预测因素。
晚期肾上腺皮质癌(ACC)的治疗包括单独使用米托坦或与依托泊苷、阿霉素和顺铂(EDP)联合使用。尽管这两种疗法都被广泛使用,但反应的标志物仍然缺乏。由于基于炎症的评分已被认为是ACC的预后因素,我们旨在研究它们在预测一线化疗反应中的作用。我们对接受米托坦单药治疗或EDP±米托坦治疗的晚期ACC患者进行了回顾性分析。临床参数(诊断时的肿瘤分期、切除状态、Ki67、从诊断到治疗开始的时间、表现状态、血浆mitotane水平、达到mitotane靶点的时间≥80%、临床上明显的皮质醇分泌过多)和基于预处理炎症的评分(中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比率,衍生的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率)。主要终点是从治疗开始的总生存期(OS)和进展时间(TTP),次要终点是对治疗的最佳客观反应。我们纳入了90名接受米托坦单药治疗(n=40)或EDP±米托坦治疗(n=50)的患者(59%为女性,中位年龄=51岁)。在米托坦单药治疗队列中,NLR≥5和PLR≥190预测OS较短(危险比(HR):145.83,95%CI:1.87-11323.83;HR:165.50,95%CI:1.76-15538.04),在包括临床变量在内的多变量分析中仍然显著。NLR也与较短的TTP相关(HR:2.58,95%CI:1.28-5.20),但仅在单变量分析中。NLR≥5的患者比NLR<5的患者表现出更差的治疗反应(P=0.040)。在EDP±米托坦队列中,在单变量分析中,NLR≥5%预测OS(HR:2.52,95%CI:1.30-4.88)和TTP(HR:1.95,95%CI:1.04-3.66)更短。总之,根据常规测量的参数计算的基于炎症的评分可能有助于预测晚期ACC对化疗的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine-related cancer
Endocrine-related cancer 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrine-Related Cancer is an official flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology and is endorsed by the European Society of Endocrinology, the United Kingdom and Ireland Neuroendocrine Society, and the Japanese Hormones and Cancer Society. Endocrine-Related Cancer provides a unique international forum for the publication of high quality original articles describing novel, cutting edge basic laboratory, translational and clinical investigations of human health and disease focusing on endocrine neoplasias and hormone-dependent cancers; and for the publication of authoritative review articles in these topics. Endocrine neoplasias include adrenal cortex, breast, multiple endocrine neoplasia, neuroendocrine tumours, ovary, prostate, paraganglioma, parathyroid, pheochromocytoma pituitary, testes, thyroid and hormone-dependent cancers. Neoplasias affecting metabolism and energy production such as bladder, bone, kidney, lung, and head and neck, are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Cushing syndrome from an ACTH-producing pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma: structured review of 94 cases GPNMB promotes tumor growth and is a biomarker for lymphangioleiomyomatosis Neuropilin-2 and soluble neuropilin-2 in neuroendocrine neoplasms Importance of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases and their clinical use in prostate cancer Genetic disorders and insulinoma/glucagonoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1