Do Incentives Crowd Out Motivation? A Feasibility Study of a Community Vector-Control Campaign in Peru.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-30 DOI:10.1080/08964289.2021.1977603
Alison M Buttenheim, Ricardo Castillo-Neyra, Claudia Arevalo-Nieto, Julianna E Shinnick, Justin K Sheen, Kevin G Volpp, Valerie Paz-Soldan, Jere R Behrman, Michael Z Levy
{"title":"Do Incentives Crowd Out Motivation? A Feasibility Study of a Community Vector-Control Campaign in Peru.","authors":"Alison M Buttenheim, Ricardo Castillo-Neyra, Claudia Arevalo-Nieto, Julianna E Shinnick, Justin K Sheen, Kevin G Volpp, Valerie Paz-Soldan, Jere R Behrman, Michael Z Levy","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2021.1977603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incentives are a useful tool in encouraging healthy behavior as part of public health initiatives. However, there remains concern about motivation crowd out-a decline in levels of motivation to undertake a behavior to below baseline levels after incentives have been removed-and few public health studies have assessed for motivation crowd out. Here, we assess the feasibility of identifying motivation crowd out following a lottery to promote participation in a Chagas disease vector control campaign. We look for evidence of crowd out in subsequent participation in the same behavior, a related behavior, and an unrelated behavior. We identified potential motivation crowd out for the same behavior, but not for related behavior or unrelated behaviors after lottery incentives are removed. Despite some limitations, we conclude that motivation crowd out is feasible to assess in large-scale trials of incentives.</p>","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":"49 1","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9869690/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2021.1977603","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Incentives are a useful tool in encouraging healthy behavior as part of public health initiatives. However, there remains concern about motivation crowd out-a decline in levels of motivation to undertake a behavior to below baseline levels after incentives have been removed-and few public health studies have assessed for motivation crowd out. Here, we assess the feasibility of identifying motivation crowd out following a lottery to promote participation in a Chagas disease vector control campaign. We look for evidence of crowd out in subsequent participation in the same behavior, a related behavior, and an unrelated behavior. We identified potential motivation crowd out for the same behavior, but not for related behavior or unrelated behaviors after lottery incentives are removed. Despite some limitations, we conclude that motivation crowd out is feasible to assess in large-scale trials of incentives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激励会挤掉动力吗?秘鲁社区病媒控制运动可行性研究》。
作为公共卫生活动的一部分,激励措施是鼓励健康行为的有效手段。然而,人们仍然担心动机挤出问题--即在激励措施取消后,采取某种行为的动机水平下降到基线水平以下--很少有公共卫生研究对动机挤出进行评估。在此,我们评估了在通过抽奖促进参与南美锥虫病病媒控制活动之后识别动机挤出的可行性。我们在随后参与相同行为、相关行为和不相关行为的过程中寻找挤出的证据。我们发现了相同行为的潜在动机排挤,但没有发现抽奖激励取消后相关行为或无关行为的潜在动机排挤。尽管存在一些局限性,但我们得出结论,在大规模激励试验中评估动机挤出是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Medicine
Behavioral Medicine 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states. Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Clinician Perspectives on Implementing HPV Vaccination Guidelines into Practice. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Body Mass Index Status among Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs. Prospective Attitudes Towards Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccine in Pregnant Women in Greece. The Role of Intersectional Stigma in Coronary Artery Disease Among Cisgender Women Aging with HIV. Men's Preferences for Language and Communication in Mental Health Promotion: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1