A theory-based research literacy intervention for nurses: A pilot study.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-19 DOI:10.1111/nuf.12780

Sonia Hines, Joanne Ramsbotham, Fiona Coyer

{"title":"A theory-based research literacy intervention for nurses: A pilot study.","authors":"Sonia Hines, Joanne Ramsbotham, Fiona Coyer","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Difficulties with understanding research literature can lead to nurses having low engagement with evidence-based practice (EBP). This study aimed to test the feasibility of an education intervention using an academic literacies approach to improve nurses' research literacy.Methods: An interactive workshop was devised utilizing genre analysis and tested in a pre/post pilot study. EBP self-efficacy was measured at baseline and posttest using the Self-Efficacy in Evidence-Based Practice instrument (26 items on an 11-point scale for total scores from 0 to 260). Research comprehension was measured with a 10-question quiz (range 0-10).Results: When analyzed with a paired t-test, EBP self-efficacy increased significantly (MD: 56.9, SD: 39.9, t = 4.5, df = 9, p < .001). Research comprehension also improved (MD: 1.1; SD: 1.1, t = 2.9, df 9, p < .01). The workshop evaluations (n = 9) were overwhelmingly positive.Conclusion: This novel approach to research pedagogy aligns well with adult learning theory and social learning theory and is suitable for small group learning in continuing education. There is considerable potential for further work in this area. Genre analysis shows promise as a strategy for teaching nurses to understand research literature.","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1052-1058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/7f/NUF-57-1052.PMC10084423.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Difficulties with understanding research literature can lead to nurses having low engagement with evidence-based practice (EBP). This study aimed to test the feasibility of an education intervention using an academic literacies approach to improve nurses' research literacy.

Methods: An interactive workshop was devised utilizing genre analysis and tested in a pre/post pilot study. EBP self-efficacy was measured at baseline and posttest using the Self-Efficacy in Evidence-Based Practice instrument (26 items on an 11-point scale for total scores from 0 to 260). Research comprehension was measured with a 10-question quiz (range 0-10).

Results: When analyzed with a paired t-test, EBP self-efficacy increased significantly (MD: 56.9, SD: 39.9, t = 4.5, df = 9, p < .001). Research comprehension also improved (MD: 1.1; SD: 1.1, t = 2.9, df 9, p < .01). The workshop evaluations (n = 9) were overwhelmingly positive.

Conclusion: This novel approach to research pedagogy aligns well with adult learning theory and social learning theory and is suitable for small group learning in continuing education. There is considerable potential for further work in this area. Genre analysis shows promise as a strategy for teaching nurses to understand research literature.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

以理论为基础的护士研究素养干预：试点研究。

目的：难以理解研究文献会导致护士对循证实践（EBP）的参与度较低。本研究旨在测试采用学术素养方法提高护士研究素养的教育干预措施的可行性：方法：利用体裁分析法设计了一个互动研讨会，并在试点研究前后进行了测试。在基线和测试后，使用循证实践自我效能工具（26 个项目，11 分制，总分 0-260 分）测量 EBP 自我效能。研究理解能力通过 10 个问题的测验（范围 0-10）进行测量：结果：用配对 t 检验分析，EBP 自我效能感显著提高（MD：56.9，SD：39.9，t = 4.5，df = 9，p 结论：EBP 自我效能感的提高是一种新的研究教学法：这种新颖的研究教学法非常符合成人学习理论和社会学习理论，适合继续教育中的小组学习。在这一领域开展进一步的工作大有可为。体裁分析有望成为教授护士理解研究文献的一种策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

NURSING FORUM NURSING-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

4.20%

发文量

151

期刊介绍： Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.