Barriers to, and enablers of, paramedics responding to suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases: An integrative review

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Australasian Emergency Care Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.auec.2022.08.001
Ursula Howarth , Peta-Anne Zimmerman , Thea van de Mortel , Nigel Barr
{"title":"Barriers to, and enablers of, paramedics responding to suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases: An integrative review","authors":"Ursula Howarth ,&nbsp;Peta-Anne Zimmerman ,&nbsp;Thea van de Mortel ,&nbsp;Nigel Barr","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2022.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has focused attention on healthcare workers’ concerns about working during a pandemic, yet research on the effect of the pandemic specifically on paramedics is lacking. This literature review aims to critically examine the current knowledge of paramedics’ experience of barriers to, and enablers of, responding to suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An integrative review was undertaken using articles found by a systematic search of four research databases. Inclusion criteria included paramedics or emergency medical technicians who had experience of barriers or enablers responding to patients during the coronavirus pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nine articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Barriers included communication and poor leadership, fear of infection to self and family, frequent changes in guidelines and inconsistencies across agencies, stress/burnout, and concerns with personal protective equipment. Enablers included job security, perceived social support, solidarity with other paramedics, and use of modern technologies for communication.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There are unique experiences of working during the COVID-19 pandemic in the prehospital environment. Particular challenges occurred with leadership, communication within the organisation and between agencies, and working in an unpredictable environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359508/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X22000537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has focused attention on healthcare workers’ concerns about working during a pandemic, yet research on the effect of the pandemic specifically on paramedics is lacking. This literature review aims to critically examine the current knowledge of paramedics’ experience of barriers to, and enablers of, responding to suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases.

Methods

An integrative review was undertaken using articles found by a systematic search of four research databases. Inclusion criteria included paramedics or emergency medical technicians who had experience of barriers or enablers responding to patients during the coronavirus pandemic.

Results

Nine articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Barriers included communication and poor leadership, fear of infection to self and family, frequent changes in guidelines and inconsistencies across agencies, stress/burnout, and concerns with personal protective equipment. Enablers included job security, perceived social support, solidarity with other paramedics, and use of modern technologies for communication.

Conclusions

There are unique experiences of working during the COVID-19 pandemic in the prehospital environment. Particular challenges occurred with leadership, communication within the organisation and between agencies, and working in an unpredictable environment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理人员应对疑似或确诊COVID-19病例的障碍和推动因素:综合综述
背景冠状病毒大流行(新冠肺炎)将注意力集中在医护人员对在大流行期间工作的担忧上,但缺乏关于大流行对医护人员的影响的研究。这篇文献综述旨在批判性地检查护理人员对应对疑似或确诊新冠肺炎病例的障碍和促成因素的经验的现有知识。方法利用系统检索四个研究数据库中的文章进行综合评价。纳入标准包括有在冠状病毒大流行期间应对患者的障碍或使能因素经验的护理人员或急救医疗技术人员。结果9篇文章符合纳入和排除标准。障碍包括沟通和领导能力差、对自我和家人感染的恐惧、指导方针的频繁变化和各机构之间的不一致、压力/倦怠以及对个人防护设备的担忧。促成因素包括工作保障、感知到的社会支持、与其他护理人员的团结以及现代通信技术的使用。结论新冠肺炎大流行期间,在院前环境中有独特的工作经验。领导能力、组织内部和机构之间的沟通以及在不可预测的环境中工作都面临着特殊的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Nonstandard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and basic life support: A scoping review of techniques applicable to wheelchair users. Strengthening emergency department response to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear disasters: A scoping review. Emergency management of orbital compartment syndrome: Lateral canthotomy and cantholysis case series. A scoping review study of patients with a primary immune deficiency who have presented to the paediatric emergency department with a fever. X-ray imaging of multiple adjacent regions in paediatric patients: Potential utility for diagnosis and patient management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1