The Efficacy of an Intervention Program for Pain Intensity Reduction in Patients Undergoing Arterial Sheath Removal after Coronary Artery Angioplasty.

Esmail Heidaranlu, Naser Sedghi Goyaghaj, Ali Moradi, Abbas Ebadi
{"title":"The Efficacy of an Intervention Program for Pain Intensity Reduction in Patients Undergoing Arterial Sheath Removal after Coronary Artery Angioplasty.","authors":"Esmail Heidaranlu,&nbsp;Naser Sedghi Goyaghaj,&nbsp;Ali Moradi,&nbsp;Abbas Ebadi","doi":"10.18502/jthc.v16i3.8186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pain management after sheath removal is one of the most significant points in patient care. The use of a simple, practical, and combined method in this field is essential. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention program for pain intensity reduction in patients undergoing arterial sheath removal after coronary artery angioplasty. <b>Methods:</b> This semi-experimental study was conducted in 2020 on 90 eligible patients selected via the purpose-based method and randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The intervention program for the experimental group included training to relax the abdominal muscles, deep and slow breathing, and precise pressure on the femoral pulse. Pain intensity was measured before, during, and several times after arterial sheath removal. The independent t, Fisher exact, and χ2 tests were used to analyze the data. <b>Results:</b> Women comprised 66.6% of the study participants, who had a mean age of 58.20±8.70 years. No significant differences were observed concerning pain intensity, bleeding, pseudoaneurysm formation, and hematoma between the 2 groups before the intervention (P=0.531). However, during the intervention and in the fifth and tenth minutes after the intervention, pain intensity was lower in the experimental group (P<0.050), whereas no such differences were observed regarding bleeding, pseudoaneurysm formation, and hematoma. <b>Conclusions:</b> Given the effectiveness of our intervention program in ameliorating pain intensity and vasovagal response after arterial sheath removal, we suggest that this program, along with prescription drugs, be used for the management of patients' pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":39149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","volume":"16 3","pages":"102-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/ba/JTHC-16-102.PMC9108473.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tehran University Heart Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jthc.v16i3.8186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain management after sheath removal is one of the most significant points in patient care. The use of a simple, practical, and combined method in this field is essential. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention program for pain intensity reduction in patients undergoing arterial sheath removal after coronary artery angioplasty. Methods: This semi-experimental study was conducted in 2020 on 90 eligible patients selected via the purpose-based method and randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The intervention program for the experimental group included training to relax the abdominal muscles, deep and slow breathing, and precise pressure on the femoral pulse. Pain intensity was measured before, during, and several times after arterial sheath removal. The independent t, Fisher exact, and χ2 tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Women comprised 66.6% of the study participants, who had a mean age of 58.20±8.70 years. No significant differences were observed concerning pain intensity, bleeding, pseudoaneurysm formation, and hematoma between the 2 groups before the intervention (P=0.531). However, during the intervention and in the fifth and tenth minutes after the intervention, pain intensity was lower in the experimental group (P<0.050), whereas no such differences were observed regarding bleeding, pseudoaneurysm formation, and hematoma. Conclusions: Given the effectiveness of our intervention program in ameliorating pain intensity and vasovagal response after arterial sheath removal, we suggest that this program, along with prescription drugs, be used for the management of patients' pain.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干预方案对冠状动脉成形术后动脉鞘切除患者疼痛强度降低的效果。
背景:鞘拔出后的疼痛管理是患者护理中最重要的一点。在这一领域使用一种简单、实用和综合的方法是必要的。本研究的目的是评估干预方案对冠状动脉成形术后动脉鞘切除患者疼痛强度降低的效果。方法:本半实验研究于2020年进行,采用目的为基础的方法选择90例符合条件的患者,随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组的干预方案包括腹部肌肉放松训练、深呼吸和慢呼吸、精确按压股脉。分别在动脉鞘切除前、中、后几次测量疼痛强度。采用独立t检验、Fisher精确检验和χ2检验对数据进行分析。结果:女性占研究参与者的66.6%,平均年龄58.20±8.70岁。干预前两组患者在疼痛强度、出血、假性动脉瘤形成、血肿方面差异无统计学意义(P=0.531)。然而,在干预期间以及干预后的第5分钟和第10分钟,实验组的疼痛强度较低(p结论:鉴于我们的干预方案在改善动脉鞘切除后的疼痛强度和血管迷走神经反应方面的有效性,我们建议将该方案与处方药一起用于患者的疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center
Journal of Tehran University Heart Center Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Hospitalization Rates due to Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis. Heart Xenotransplantation: Current Issues and Perspectives. Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients with Right Bundle Branch Block. Association between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and High-Risk Features in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A Multicenter Study. Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension among 10663 Adults Based on the Baseline Data of the Kherameh Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1