[Do Others Care about me and Encourage me to be Myself? A Propensity-Score Analysis on the Effect of Chronic Health Impairments on Work-Related Perceived Inclusion].

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1907-3585
Veronika Chakraverty, Heinz Zimmer, Mathilde Niehaus
{"title":"[Do Others Care about me and Encourage me to be Myself? A Propensity-Score Analysis on the Effect of Chronic Health Impairments on Work-Related Perceived Inclusion].","authors":"Veronika Chakraverty,&nbsp;Heinz Zimmer,&nbsp;Mathilde Niehaus","doi":"10.1055/a-1907-3585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study evaluated the effect of chronic health impairments on work-related perceived inclusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an online questionnaire, we collected data on employees' perceived inclusion (1807 with and 540 without impairments) and identified matched pairs based on propensity scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Employees with impairments perceived themselves as less included than their matched pairs without impairments, but only if they regarded themselves as severely limited in their work activities or if they regarded their impairment as severely stigmatized. Limitations and stigmata were found to be independent negative predictors of perceived inclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest a need for measures to improve the work-related perceived inclusion of people with chronic health impairments. Such measures should aim at optimising workplace accommodations as well as changing performance-related social norms in organisations and stereotypical assumptions about employees with chronic health impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1907-3585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Our study evaluated the effect of chronic health impairments on work-related perceived inclusion.

Methods: Using an online questionnaire, we collected data on employees' perceived inclusion (1807 with and 540 without impairments) and identified matched pairs based on propensity scores.

Results: Employees with impairments perceived themselves as less included than their matched pairs without impairments, but only if they regarded themselves as severely limited in their work activities or if they regarded their impairment as severely stigmatized. Limitations and stigmata were found to be independent negative predictors of perceived inclusion.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest a need for measures to improve the work-related perceived inclusion of people with chronic health impairments. Such measures should aim at optimising workplace accommodations as well as changing performance-related social norms in organisations and stereotypical assumptions about employees with chronic health impairments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
别人关心我,鼓励我做自己吗?慢性健康障碍对工作相关感知包容影响的倾向得分分析[j]。
目的:本研究评估慢性健康损伤对工作相关感知包容的影响。方法:通过在线问卷收集员工感知包容的数据(1807名残疾员工和540名无残疾员工),并根据倾向得分确定匹配的配对。结果:有残疾的员工认为自己比没有残疾的员工更不受包容,但只有当他们认为自己在工作活动中受到严重限制或他们认为自己的残疾受到严重侮辱时才会如此。局限性和柱头是感知包容的独立负向预测因子。结论:我们的研究结果表明,需要采取措施来改善慢性健康障碍患者的工作感知包容。这些措施的目的应是优化工作场所的便利条件,改变组织中与绩效有关的社会规范和对患有慢性健康障碍的雇员的陈规定型假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
期刊最新文献
[Vocational Rehabilitation in Times of the Covid-19 Pandemic]. [What is the Impact of Early Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Management on Outcome after Polytrauma?] [Measuring Disability in Participation Survey and Social Reporting]. [Return to Work after Cancer - a Systematic Review of Predictors in Germany]. [Validated German PROMs for People with Major Amputation of the Lower Extremity - A Narrative Review Based on the Final Report of the LEAD and COMPASS Initiative of the ISPO].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1