NPH Insulin Versus Insulin Glargine Versus NPH Insulin Plus Insulin Glargine for the Treatment of Dexamethasone-Induced Hyperglycemia in Patients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1177/87551225231156329
Courtney R Fornwald, Natalie S Tuttle, Julie A Murphy
{"title":"NPH Insulin Versus Insulin Glargine Versus NPH Insulin Plus Insulin Glargine for the Treatment of Dexamethasone-Induced Hyperglycemia in Patients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Courtney R Fornwald,&nbsp;Natalie S Tuttle,&nbsp;Julie A Murphy","doi":"10.1177/87551225231156329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dexamethasone use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 significantly reduces mortality; however, it commonly results in hyperglycemia. Optimal treatment of dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia is not well established.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study purpose was to assess the difference in blood glucose (BG) control between insulin glargine, neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin, and insulin glargine plus NPH insulin for dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted in adult inpatients with T2DM and COVID-19 infection who received 6 mg of dexamethasone once daily and insulin during the 5-day study period. The primary outcome was the difference in mean point-of-care (POC) BG levels between study insulins. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, length of stay, and the percent difference between the mean daily inpatient and home basal insulin doses (for patients who were receiving basal insulin prior to admission in the insulin glargine and insulin glargine and NPH insulin groups only).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six patients were included in the analysis (67 insulin glargine, 10 NPH insulin, and 19 insulin glargine plus NPH insulin). The difference in mean POC BG level was not different among groups (254 ± 60 mg/dL vs 234 ± 39 mg/dL vs 250 ± 51 mg/dL, respectively; <i>P</i> = 0.548). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No difference in the mean POC BG level was observed. Dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia was poorly controlled in patients with T2DM and COVID-19 infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9982395/pdf/10.1177_87551225231156329.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231156329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dexamethasone use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 significantly reduces mortality; however, it commonly results in hyperglycemia. Optimal treatment of dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia is not well established.

Objective: The study purpose was to assess the difference in blood glucose (BG) control between insulin glargine, neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin, and insulin glargine plus NPH insulin for dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and COVID-19 infection.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in adult inpatients with T2DM and COVID-19 infection who received 6 mg of dexamethasone once daily and insulin during the 5-day study period. The primary outcome was the difference in mean point-of-care (POC) BG levels between study insulins. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, length of stay, and the percent difference between the mean daily inpatient and home basal insulin doses (for patients who were receiving basal insulin prior to admission in the insulin glargine and insulin glargine and NPH insulin groups only).

Results: Ninety-six patients were included in the analysis (67 insulin glargine, 10 NPH insulin, and 19 insulin glargine plus NPH insulin). The difference in mean POC BG level was not different among groups (254 ± 60 mg/dL vs 234 ± 39 mg/dL vs 250 ± 51 mg/dL, respectively; P = 0.548). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: No difference in the mean POC BG level was observed. Dexamethasone-induced hyperglycemia was poorly controlled in patients with T2DM and COVID-19 infection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NPH胰岛素vs甘精胰岛素vs NPH胰岛素加甘精胰岛素治疗地塞米松诱导的COVID-19患者高血糖:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:COVID-19住院患者使用地塞米松可显著降低死亡率;然而,它通常会导致高血糖。地塞米松诱导的高血糖的最佳治疗方法尚未确定。目的:评价甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白hagedorn (NPH)胰岛素、甘精胰岛素加中性鱼精蛋白hagedorn胰岛素对2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并COVID-19感染患者地塞米松诱导高血糖的血糖控制差异。方法:回顾性研究T2DM合并COVID-19感染的成年住院患者,在5天的研究期间接受6 mg地塞米松每日1次和胰岛素治疗。主要结果是研究胰岛素之间的平均护理点(POC) BG水平的差异。次要结局包括高血糖和低血糖的发生率、住院时间、平均每日住院和家庭基础胰岛素剂量之间的百分比差异(仅适用于入院前接受基础胰岛素治疗的甘精胰岛素组、甘精胰岛素组和NPH胰岛素组)。结果:96例患者纳入分析,其中甘精胰岛素67例,NPH胰岛素10例,甘精胰岛素加NPH胰岛素19例。各组平均POC BG水平差异无统计学意义(分别为254±60 mg/dL、234±39 mg/dL和250±51 mg/dL);P = 0.548)。两组的次要结局无显著差异。结论:两组患者的平均POC BG水平无显著差异。地塞米松诱导的高血糖在T2DM合并COVID-19感染患者中控制较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Apixaban Use in Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease. Phenobarbital Dosing for the Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: A Review of the Literature. Effectiveness of an Aerosol Inhalation Monitor in an Ambulatory Primary Care Pharmacy Clinic Implementation of Virtual Interactive Cases for Pharmacy Education: A Single-Center Experience. The Role of Telepharmacy in the Delivery of Clinical Pharmacy Services Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1