Endoscopic adenoidectomy with microdebrider

S. Rojas Khek, C. Tolentino, H. Santana, A. Yamashita, A. Arrais
{"title":"Endoscopic adenoidectomy with microdebrider","authors":"S. Rojas Khek,&nbsp;C. Tolentino,&nbsp;H. Santana,&nbsp;A. Yamashita,&nbsp;A. Arrais","doi":"10.1016/S0531-5131(03)01169-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The classic method of adenoidectomy with different </span>curettes is used worldwide. Among the recent methods of adenoidectomy, we will show the microdebrider combined with transnasal video-endoscopic view. The purpose is to demonstrate and describe the adenoidectomy using the microdebrider combined with endoscopic view, emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages compared with traditional methods.</p><p>We have studied 50 patients diagnosed with obstructive hypertrophy of pharyngeal tonsils.</p><p>It was possible to make the adenoidectomy with microdebrider by direct view in all of the cases. The advantages are as follows: (a) realization of the surgery by direct view; (b) a better view of the peritubarian recesses decreasing the possibility of lesion; (c) better control of the adenoidal tissue to be removed, mainly in the recesses; (d) better and direct control of the bleeding; (e) avoidance of temporary gauze blockage; and (f) recording of the procedure on videotape. Among the disadvantages, we can consider the following: (a) bleeding sometimes makes the endoscopic view difficult, which may prolong the surgical time; and (b) the cost of the involved equipment. In spite of the advantages and disadvantages of this method, the authors believe in its utility as one more valid option for the surgeon.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84918,"journal":{"name":"International congress series","volume":"1257 ","pages":"Pages 193-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0531-5131(03)01169-5","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International congress series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531513103011695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The classic method of adenoidectomy with different curettes is used worldwide. Among the recent methods of adenoidectomy, we will show the microdebrider combined with transnasal video-endoscopic view. The purpose is to demonstrate and describe the adenoidectomy using the microdebrider combined with endoscopic view, emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages compared with traditional methods.

We have studied 50 patients diagnosed with obstructive hypertrophy of pharyngeal tonsils.

It was possible to make the adenoidectomy with microdebrider by direct view in all of the cases. The advantages are as follows: (a) realization of the surgery by direct view; (b) a better view of the peritubarian recesses decreasing the possibility of lesion; (c) better control of the adenoidal tissue to be removed, mainly in the recesses; (d) better and direct control of the bleeding; (e) avoidance of temporary gauze blockage; and (f) recording of the procedure on videotape. Among the disadvantages, we can consider the following: (a) bleeding sometimes makes the endoscopic view difficult, which may prolong the surgical time; and (b) the cost of the involved equipment. In spite of the advantages and disadvantages of this method, the authors believe in its utility as one more valid option for the surgeon.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下腺样体切除术
腺样体切除术的经典方法是采用不同的导管。在最近的腺样体切除术方法中,我们将展示微清创器结合经鼻视频-内窥镜检查。目的是展示和描述使用显微清跳器结合内镜视图的腺样体切除术,强调与传统方法相比的优点和缺点。我们研究了50例诊断为咽扁桃体梗阻性肥大的患者。所有病例均可在直视下使用微清创器进行腺样体切除术。其优点是:(a)可实现手术直视;(b)更好地观察输卵管周围的隐窝,减少病变的可能性;(c)较好地控制待切除的腺样体组织,主要是隐窝;(d)更好、更直接地控制出血;(e)避免纱布暂时堵塞;(f)对过程进行录像。在缺点中,我们可以考虑以下几点:(a)出血有时使内镜观察困难,可能延长手术时间;(b)相关设备的成本。尽管这种方法有优点和缺点,但作者相信它是外科医生的一个更有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Acknowledgements Author Index Keyword Index Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1